Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mitchell Black 0001
dblp:262/3347-1 · also Mitchell K. Black Jr.
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3857-1146ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 54% Reinforcement learning · 21% Multi-agent systems · 21% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › safe control
control barrier functions |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control · ICLR 2025 Safety Under Uncertainty: Tight Bounds with Risk-Aware Control Barrier Functions · ICRA 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent control
safe multi-agent control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Safety Under Uncertainty: Tight Bounds with Risk-Aware Control Barrier Functions · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
safe control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Safety Under Uncertainty: Tight Bounds with Risk-Aware Control Barrier Functions · ICRA 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safety constraints |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control · ICLR 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning for self-driving vehicles |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Safety Under Uncertainty: Tight Bounds with Risk-Aware Control Barrier Functions · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximal policy optimization · 0.9graph control barrier function · 0.9stochastic level-crossing · 0.7risk-aware control barrier function · 0.7martingale theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal ControlabstractControl policies that can achieve high task performance and satisfy safety constraints are desirable for any system, including multi-agent systems (MAS). One promising technique for ensuring the safety of MAS is distributed control barrier functions (CBF). However, it is difficult to design distributed CBF-based policies for MAS that can tackle unknown discrete-time dynamics, partial observability, changing neighborhoods, and input constraints, especially when a distributed high-performance nominal policy that can achieve the task is unavailable. To tackle these challenges, we propose **DGPPO**, a new framework that *simultaneously* learns both a *discrete* graph CBF which handles neighborhood changes and input constraints, and a distributed high-performance safe policy for MAS with unknown discrete-time dynamics.
We empirically validate our claims on a suite of multi-agent tasks spanning three different simulation engines. The results suggest that, compared with existing methods, our DGPPO framework obtains policies that achieve high task performance (matching baselines that ignore the safety constraints), and high safety rates (matching the most conservative baselines), with a *constant* set of hyperparameters across all environments. Songyuan Zhang, Oswin So, Mitchell Black 0001, Chuchu Fan |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | CBFkit: A Control Barrier Function Toolbox for Robotics ApplicationsabstractThis paper introduces CBFkit, a Python/ROS toolbox for safe robotics planning and control under uncertainty. The toolbox provides a general framework for designing control barrier functions for mobility systems within both deterministic and stochastic environments. It can be connected to the ROS open-source robotics middleware, allowing for the setup of multi-robot applications, encoding of environments and maps, and integrations with predictive motion planning algorithms. Additionally, it offers multiple CBF variations and algorithms for robot control. The CBFKit is demonstrated on the Toyota Human Support Robot (HSR) in both simulation and in physical experiments. Mitchell Black 0001, Georgios Fainekos, Bardh Hoxha, Hideki Okamoto, Danil V. Prokhorov |
IROS | 1 |
| 2023 | Safety Under Uncertainty: Tight Bounds with Risk-Aware Control Barrier FunctionsabstractWe propose a novel class of risk-aware control barrier functions (RA-CBFs) for the control of stochastic safety-critical systems. Leveraging a result from the stochastic level-crossing literature, we deviate from the martingale theory that is currently used in stochastic CBF techniques and prove that a RA-CBF based control synthesis confers a tighter upper bound on the probability of the system becoming unsafe within a finite time interval than existing approaches. We highlight the advantages of our proposed approach over the state-of-the-art via a comparative study on an mobile-robot example, and further demonstrate its viability on an autonomous vehicle highway merging problem in dense traffic. Mitchell Black 0001, Georgios Fainekos, Bardh Hoxha, Danil V. Prokhorov, Dimitra Panagou |
ICRA | 1 |