Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sarah Bordage

dblp:262/3682 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 46% Computational complexity · 31% Computational geometry · 15%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing
1.622026
All Polynomial Generators Preserve Distance with Mutual Correlated Agreement · CCC 2026
Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes
1.622026
All Polynomial Generators Preserve Distance with Mutual Correlated Agreement · CCC 2026
Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022
Computational geometry › graph drawing › geometric embedding
distance preservation
1.012026
All Polynomial Generators Preserve Distance with Mutual Correlated Agreement · CCC 2026
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
1.012026
All Polynomial Generators Preserve Distance with Mutual Correlated Agreement · CCC 2026
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
algebraic geometry code
0.612022
Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022
Logic in computer science › proof systems
interactive oracle proofs
0.612022
Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022
Computational complexity
interactive oracle proof of proximity
0.612022
Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polynomial generators · 1.0johnson bound · 1.0riemann-roch space decomposition · 0.6kummer curves · 0.6hermitian tower · 0.6group action · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 All Polynomial Generators Preserve Distance with Mutual Correlated Agreement
abstract
A generator is a function that maps a random seed to a list of coefficients. We study generators that preserve distance to a linear code: the linear combination of any list of vectors using coefficients sampled by the generator has distance to the code no smaller than that of the original vectors, except for a small error. Distance preservation plays a central role in modern probabilistic proofs, and has been formalized in several ways. We study mutual correlated agreement, the strongest known form of distance preservation. We initiate a systematic study of mutual correlated agreement, aiming to characterize the class of generators with this property. Towards this, we study polynomial generators, a rich class that includes all examples of generators considered in the distance preservation literature. Our main result is that all polynomial generators guarantee mutual correlated agreement for every linear code. This improves on prior work both in generality (the class of generators covered) and in parameters (the error bounds). We additionally provide new results for the case where the linear code is a Reed-Solomon code, which is of particular interest in applications. We prove that all polynomial generators satisfy mutual correlated agreement for Reed-Solomon codes up to the Johnson bound. In particular, we improve upon the state-of-the-art by Ben-Sasson, Carmon, Ishai, Kopparty, and Saraf (FOCS 2020) and answer a question posed by Arnon, Chiesa, Fenzi, and Yogev (Eurocrypt 2025). Along the way we develop a flexible and general toolbox for mutual correlated agreement, and are the first to establish distance preservation for generators that lie beyond polynomial generators.
Sarah Bordage, Alessandro Chiesa, Ziyi Guan 0001, Ignacio Manzur
CCC1
2023 Efficient multivariate low-degree tests via interactive oracle proofs of proximity for polynomial codes
Daniel Augot, Sarah Bordage, Jade Nardi
Des. Codes Cryptogr.2
2022 Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes
abstract
In this work, we initiate the study of proximity testing to Algebraic Geometry (AG) codes. An AG code $C = C(\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{P}, D)$ over an algebraic curve $\mathcal{X}$ is a vector space associated to evaluations on $\mathcal{P}$ of functions in the Riemann-Roch space $L_\mathcal{X}(D)$. The problem of testing proximity to an error-correcting code $C$ consists in distinguishing between the case where an input word, given as an oracle, belongs to $C$ and the one where it is far from every codeword of $C$. AG codes are good candidates to construct short proof systems, but there exists no efficient proximity tests for them. We aim to fill this gap. We construct an Interactive Oracle Proof of Proximity (IOPP) for some families of AG codes by generalizing an IOPP for Reed-Solomon codes introduced by Ben-Sasson, Bentov, Horesh and Riabzev, known as the FRI protocol. We identify suitable requirements for designing efficient IOPP systems for AG codes. Our approach relies on a neat decomposition of the Riemann-Roch space of any invariant divisor under a group action on a curve into several explicit Riemann-Roch spaces on the quotient curve. We provide sufficient conditions on an AG code $C$ that allow to reduce a proximity testing problem for $C$ to a membership problem for a significantly smaller code $C'$. As concrete instantiations, we study AG codes on Kummer curves and curves in the Hermitian tower. The latter can be defined over polylogarithmic-size alphabet. We specialize the generic AG-IOPP construction to reach linear prover running time and logarithmic verification on Kummer curves, and quasilinear prover time with polylogarithmic verification on the Hermitian tower.
Sarah Bordage, Mathieu Lhotel, Jade Nardi, Hugues Randriambololona
CCC1