Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Denis Jered McInerney

dblp:262/6563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5828-2379ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
attention alignment
0.612022
That's the Wrong Lung! Evaluating and Improving the Interpretability of Unsupervised Multimodal Encoders for Medical Data · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
That's the Wrong Lung! Evaluating and Improving the Interpretability of Unsupervised Multimodal Encoders for Medical Data · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal pretraining · 1.1few-shot fine-tuning · 1.1attention heatmap analysis · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Towards Reducing Diagnostic Errors with Interpretable Risk Prediction
abstract
a confident diagnosis can be made. We use an LLM to retrieve an initial pool of evidence, but then refine this set of evidence according to correlations learned by the model. We conduct an in-depth evaluation of the usefulness of our approach by simulating how it might be used by a clinician to decide between a pre-defined list of differential diagnoses.
Denis Jered McInerney, William Dickinson, Lucy C. Flynn, Andrea Young, Geoffrey S. Young, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Byron C. Wallace
NAACL-HLT1
2024 Leveraging generative AI for clinical evidence synthesis needs to ensure trustworthiness
Qiao Jin 0001, Denis Jered McInerney, Yong Chen 0016, Fei Wang 0001, Curtis L. Cole, Qian Yang 0004, Yanshan Wang, Bradley A. Malin, Mor Peleg, Byron C. Wallace, Zhiyong Lu, Chunhua Weng, Yifan Peng 0002
J. Biomed. Informatics3
2022 That's the Wrong Lung! Evaluating and Improving the Interpretability of Unsupervised Multimodal Encoders for Medical Data
abstract
Pretraining multimodal models on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) provides a means of learning representations that can transfer to downstream tasks with minimal supervision. Recent multimodal models induce soft local alignments between image regions and sentences. This is of particular interest in the medical domain, where alignments might highlight regions in an image relevant to specific phenomena described in free-text. While past work has suggested that attention "heatmaps" can be interpreted in this manner, there has been little evaluation of such alignments. We compare alignments from a state-of-the-art multimodal (image and text) model for EHR with human annotations that link image regions to sentences. Our main finding is that the text has an often weak or unintuitive influence on attention; alignments do not consistently reflect basic anatomical information. Moreover, synthetic modifications - such as substituting "left" for "right" - do not substantially influence highlights. Simple techniques such as allowing the model to opt out of attending to the image and few-shot finetuning show promise in terms of their ability to improve alignments with very little or no supervision. We make our code and checkpoints open-source.
Denis Jered McInerney, Geoffrey S. Young, Jan-Willem van de Meent, Byron C. Wallace
EMNLP1