Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiao Ming
dblp:262/7901
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 56% Knowledge graphs · 44% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Where are we in embedding spaces? · KDD 2021 |
Recommender systems › representation learning for recommendation
embedding-based recommendation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Where are we in embedding spaces? · KDD 2021 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph embedding
hyperbolic embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Where are we in embedding spaces? · KDD 2021 |
Recommender systems
item recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Where are we in embedding spaces? · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metric learning · 1.0latent space analysis · 1.0hyperbolic space · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Where are we in embedding spaces?abstractHyperbolic space and hyperbolic embeddings are becoming a popular research field for recommender systems. However, it is not clear under what circumstances the hyperbolic space should be considered. To fill this gap, This paper provides theoretical analysis and empirical results on when and where to use hyperbolic space and hyperbolic embeddings in recommender systems. Specifically, we answer the questions that which type of models and datasets are more suited for hyperbolic space, as well as which latent size to choose. We evaluate our answers by comparing the performance of Euclidean space and hyperbolic space on different latent space models in both general item recommendation domain and social recommendation domain, with 6 widely used datasets and different latent sizes. Additionally, we propose a new metric learning based recommendation method called SCML and its hyperbolic version HSCML. We evaluate our conclusions regarding hyperbolic space on SCML and show the state-of-the-art performance of hyperbolic space by comparing HSCML with other baseline methods. Sixiao Zhang, Hongxu Chen 0002, Xiao Ming, Li-Zhen Cui 0001, Hongzhi Yin, Guandong Xu |
KDD | 3 |