Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiongqiong Liu

dblp:263/0032 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7842-2447ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Learning and educational technologies · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Time series and sequential data · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Learning and educational technologies › student knowledge modeling › knowledge tracing
deep knowledge tracing
1.322023
Enhancing Deep Knowledge Tracing with Auxiliary Tasks · WWW 2023
XES3G5M: A Knowledge Tracing Benchmark Dataset with Auxiliary Information · NeurIPS 2023
Learning and educational technologies › student knowledge modeling
knowledge tracing
1.322023
Enhancing Deep Knowledge Tracing with Auxiliary Tasks · WWW 2023
XES3G5M: A Knowledge Tracing Benchmark Dataset with Auxiliary Information · NeurIPS 2023
Computing education › student modeling
knowledge tracing
1.222023
Improving Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models with Question-centric Cognitive Representations · AAAI 2023
pyKT: A Python Library to Benchmark Deep Learning based Knowledge Tracing Models · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
explainable prediction
0.712023
Improving Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models with Question-centric Cognitive Representations · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Improving Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models with Question-centric Cognitive Representations · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › temporal sequence modeling
knowledge tracing
0.712023
simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing · ICLR 2023
Computing education › student modeling › knowledge tracing
deep knowledge tracing
0.612022
pyKT: A Python Library to Benchmark Deep Learning based Knowledge Tracing Models · NeurIPS 2022
Data mining
dataset construction
0.212023
XES3G5M: A Knowledge Tracing Benchmark Dataset with Auxiliary Information · NeurIPS 2023
Learning and educational technologies
student modeling
0.212023
simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

item response theory · 1.3deep learning · 1.3cognitive representation learning · 1.3multi-task learning · 0.7deep sequential models · 0.7empirical evaluation · 0.6data preprocessing · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Improving Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models with Question-centric Cognitive Representations
abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) is a crucial technique to predict students’ future performance by observing their historical learning processes. Due to the powerful representation ability of deep neural networks, remarkable progress has been made by using deep learning techniques to solve the KT problem. The majority of existing approaches rely on the homogeneous question assumption that questions have equivalent contributions if they share the same set of knowledge components. Unfortunately, this assumption is inaccurate in real-world educational scenarios. Furthermore, it is very challenging to interpret the prediction results from the existing deep learning based KT models. Therefore, in this paper, we present QIKT, a question-centric interpretable KT model to address the above challenges. The proposed QIKT approach explicitly models students’ knowledge state variations at a fine-grained level with question-sensitive cognitive representations that are jointly learned from a question-centric knowledge acquisition module and a question-centric problem solving module. Meanwhile, the QIKT utilizes an item response theory based prediction layer to generate interpretable prediction results. The proposed QIKT model is evaluated on three public real-world educational datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach is superior on the KT prediction task, and it outperforms a wide range of deep learning based KT models in terms of prediction accuracy with better model interpretability. To encourage reproducible results, we have provided all the datasets and code at https://pykt.org/.
Jiahao Chen 0006, Zitao Liu 0001, Shuyan Huang, Qiongqiong Liu, Weiqi Luo 0002
AAAI4
2023 simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing
Zitao Liu 0001, Qiongqiong Liu, Jiahao Chen 0006, Shuyan Huang, Weiqi Luo 0002
ICLR2
2023 SC-Ques: A Sentence Completion Question Dataset for English as a Second Language Learners
Qiongqiong Liu, Yaying Huang, Zitao Liu 0001, Shuyan Huang, Jiahao Chen 0006, Xiangyu Zhao 0001, Guimin Lin, Yuyu Zhou, Weiqi Luo 0002
ITS1
2023 XES3G5M: A Knowledge Tracing Benchmark Dataset with Auxiliary Information
abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) is a task that predicts students' future performance based on their historical learning interactions. With the rapid development of deep learning techniques, existing KT approaches follow a data-driven paradigm that uses massive problem-solving records to model students' learning processes. However, although the educational contexts contain various factors that may have an influence on student learning outcomes, existing public KT datasets mainly consist of anonymized ID-like features, which may hinder the research advances towards this field. Therefore, in this work, we present, \emph{XES3G5M}, a large-scale dataset with rich auxiliary information about questions and their associated knowledge components (KCs)\footnote{\label{ft:kc}A KC is a generalization of everyday terms like concept, principle, fact, or skill.}. The XES3G5M dataset is collected from a real-world online math learning platform, which contains 7,652 questions, and 865 KCs with 5,549,635 interactions from 18,066 students. To the best of our knowledge, the XES3G5M dataset not only has the largest number of KCs in math domain but contains the richest contextual information including tree structured KC relations, question types, textual contents and analysis and student response timestamps. Furthermore, we build a comprehensive benchmark on 19 state-of-the-art deep learning based knowledge tracing (DLKT) models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of leveraging the auxiliary information in our XES3G5M with DLKT models. We hope the proposed dataset can effectively facilitate the KT research work.
Zitao Liu 0001, Qiongqiong Liu, Teng Guo 0002, Jiahao Chen 0006, Shuyan Huang, Xiangyu Zhao 0001, Jiliang Tang, Weiqi Luo 0002, Jian Weng 0001
NeurIPS2
2023 Enhancing Deep Knowledge Tracing with Auxiliary Tasks
abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) is the problem of predicting students’ future performance based on their historical interactions with intelligent tutoring systems. Recent studies have applied multiple types of deep neural networks to solve the KT problem. However, there are two important factors in real-world educational data that are not well represented. First, most existing works augment input representations with the co-occurrence matrix of questions and knowledge components1 (KCs) but fail to explicitly integrate such intrinsic relations into the final response prediction task. Second, the individualized historical performance of students has not been well captured. In this paper, we proposed AT-DKT to improve the prediction performance of the original deep knowledge tracing model with two auxiliary learning tasks, i.e., question tagging (QT) prediction task and individualized prior knowledge (IK) prediction task. Specifically, the QT task helps learn better question representations by predicting whether questions contain specific KCs. The IK task captures students’ global historical performance by progressively predicting student-level prior knowledge that is hidden in students’ historical learning interactions. We conduct comprehensive experiments on three real-world educational datasets and compare the proposed approach to both deep sequential KT models and non-sequential models. Experimental results show that AT-DKT outperforms all sequential models with more than 0.9% improvements of AUC for all datasets, and is almost the second best compared to non-sequential models. Furthermore, we conduct both ablation studies and quantitative analysis to show the effectiveness of auxiliary tasks and the superior prediction outcomes of AT-DKT. To encourage reproducible research, we make our data and code publicly available at https://github.com/pykt-team/pykt-toolkit 2.
Zitao Liu 0001, Qiongqiong Liu, Jiahao Chen 0006, Shuyan Huang, Boyu Gao 0003, Weiqi Luo 0002, Jian Weng 0001
WWW2
2022 pyKT: A Python Library to Benchmark Deep Learning based Knowledge Tracing Models
abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) is the task of using students' historical learning interaction data to model their knowledge mastery over time so as to make predictions on their future interaction performance. Recently, remarkable progress has been made of using various deep learning techniques to solve the KT problem. However, the success behind deep learning based knowledge tracing (DLKT) approaches is still left somewhat unknown and proper measurement and analysis of these DLKT approaches remain a challenge. First, data preprocessing procedures in existing works are often private and custom, which limits experimental standardization. Furthermore, existing DLKT studies often differ in terms of the evaluation protocol and are far away real-world educational contexts. To address these problems, we introduce a comprehensive python based benchmark platform, \textsc{pyKT}, to guarantee valid comparisons across DLKT methods via thorough evaluations. The \textsc{pyKT} library consists of a standardized set of integrated data preprocessing procedures on 7 popular datasets across different domains, and 10 frequently compared DLKT model implementations for transparent experiments. Results from our fine-grained and rigorous empirical KT studies yield a set of observations and suggestions for effective DLKT, e.g., wrong evaluation setting may cause label leakage that generally leads to performance inflation; and the improvement of many DLKT approaches is minimal compared to the very first DLKT model proposed by Piech et al. \cite{piech2015deep}. We have open sourced \textsc{pyKT} and our experimental results at \url{https://pykt.org/}. We welcome contributions from other research groups and practitioners.
Zitao Liu 0001, Qiongqiong Liu, Jiahao Chen 0006, Shuyan Huang, Jiliang Tang, Weiqi Luo 0002
NeurIPS2
2021 Solving ESL Sentence Completion Questions via Pre-trained Neural Language Models
Qiongqiong Liu, Tianqiao Liu, Jiafu Zhao, Wenbiao Ding, Zhongqin Wu, Feng Xia 0001, Jiliang Tang, Zitao Liu 0001
AIED (2)1