Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruida Yang
dblp:263/1157
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph quality |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Knowledge Graphs through Voting-based User Feedback · ICDE 2020 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph quality
knowledge graph refinement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Knowledge Graphs through Voting-based User Feedback · ICDE 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
geometric programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Optimizing Knowledge Graphs through Voting-based User Feedback · ICDE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity evaluation · 0.9signomial geometric programming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Optimizing Knowledge Graphs through Voting-based User FeedbackabstractKnowledge graphs have been used in a wide range of applications to support search, recommendation, and question answering (Q&A). For example, in Q&A systems, given a new question, we may use a knowledge graph to automatically identify the most suitable answers based on similarity evaluation. However, such systems may suffer from two major limitations. First, the knowledge graph constructed based on source data may contain errors. Second, the knowledge graph may become out of date and cannot quickly adapt to new knowledge. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose an interactive framework that refines and optimizes knowledge graphs through user votes. We develop an efficient similarity evaluation notion, called extended inverse P-distance, based on which the graph optimization problem can be formulated as a signomial geometric programming problem. We then propose a basic single-vote solution and a more advanced multi-vote solution for graph optimization. We also propose a split-and-merge optimization strategy to scale up the multi-vote solution. Extensive experiments based on real-life and synthetic graphs demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed framework. Ruida Yang, Xin Lin 0001, Jianliang Xu, Yan Yang 0008, Liang He 0001 |
ICDE | 1 |