Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jay Tenenbaum

dblp:263/1858 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 82% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 18%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 57% Reinforcement learning · 43%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.222023
Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation · ICML 2023
Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Model · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › distributed differential privacy
shuffle model
1.222023
Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation · ICML 2023
Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Model · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
cross-attention control
0.712023
Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.712023
Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control · ICLR 2023
Visual content generation and editing
image editing
0.712023
Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control · ICLR 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
continual release
0.712023
Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation · ICML 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure aggregation
secure summation
0.712023
Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
differentially private bandits
0.512021
Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Model · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.512021
Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Model · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 1.3cross-attention · 1.3differential privacy · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unimodal Strategies in Density-Based Clustering
Oron Nir, Jay Tenenbaum, Ariel Shamir
ECML/PKDD (1)2
2023 Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control
Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, Daniel Cohen-Or
ICLR3
2023 Concurrent Shuffle Differential Privacy Under Continual Observation
abstract
We introduce the concurrent shuffle model of differential privacy. In this model we have multiple concurrent shufflers permuting messages from different, possibly overlapping, batches of users. Similarly to the standard (single) shuffler model, the privacy requirement is that the concatenation of all shuffled messages should be differentially private. We study the private continual summation problem (a.k.a. the counter problem) and show that the concurrent shuffle model allows for significantly improved error compared to a standard (single) shuffler model. Specifically, we give a summation algorithm with error $\tilde{O}(n^{1/(2k+1)})$ with $k$ concurrent shufflers on a sequence of length $n$. Furthermore, we prove that this bound is tight for any $k$, even if the algorithm can choose the sizes of the batches adaptively. For $k=\log n$ shufflers, the resulting error is polylogarithmic, much better than $\tilde{\Theta}(n^{1/3})$ which we show is the smallest possible with a single shuffler. We use our online summation algorithm to get algorithms with improved regret bounds for the contextual linear bandit problem. In particular we get optimal $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ regret with $k= \tilde{\Omega}(\log n)$ concurrent shufflers.
Jay Tenenbaum, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri Stemmer
ICML1
2021 Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Model
abstract
We give an $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private algorithm for the Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem in the shuffle model with a distribution-dependent regret of $O\left(\left(\sum_{a:\Delta_a>0}\frac{\log T}{\Delta_a}\right)+\frac{k\sqrt{\log\frac{1}{\delta}}\log T}{\varepsilon}\right)$, and a distribution-independent regret of $O\left(\sqrt{kT\log T}+\frac{k\sqrt{\log\frac{1}{\delta}}\log T}{\varepsilon}\right)$, where $T$ is the number of rounds, $\Delta_a$ is the suboptimality gap of the action $a$, and $k$ is the total number of actions. Our upper bound almost matches the regret of the best known algorithms for the centralized model, and significantly outperforms the best known algorithm in the local model.
Jay Tenenbaum, Haim Kaplan, Yishay Mansour, Uri Stemmer
NeurIPS1
2021 Locality Sensitive Hashing for Efficient Similar Polygon Retrieval
abstract
Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) is an effective method of indexing a set of items to support efficient nearest neighbors queries in high-dimensional spaces. The basic idea of LSH is that similar items should produce hash collisions with higher probability than dissimilar items. We study LSH for (not necessarily convex) polygons, and use it to give efficient data structures for similar shape retrieval. Arkin et al. [Arkin et al., 1991] represent polygons by their "turning function" - a function which follows the angle between the polygon’s tangent and the x-axis while traversing the perimeter of the polygon. They define the distance between polygons to be variations of the L_p (for p = 1,2) distance between their turning functions. This metric is invariant under translation, rotation and scaling (and the selection of the initial point on the perimeter) and therefore models well the intuitive notion of shape resemblance. We develop and analyze LSH near neighbor data structures for several variations of the L_p distance for functions (for p = 1,2). By applying our schemes to the turning functions of a collection of polygons we obtain efficient near neighbor LSH-based structures for polygons. To tune our structures to turning functions of polygons, we prove some new properties of these turning functions that may be of independent interest. As part of our analysis, we address the following problem which is of independent interest. Find the vertical translation of a function f that is closest in L₁ distance to a function g. We prove tight bounds on the approximation guarantee obtained by the translation which is equal to the difference between the averages of g and f.
Haim Kaplan, Jay Tenenbaum
STACS2