EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chufeng Wang
dblp:263/8266
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0003-4684-3564ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 67% Image and video coding · 33% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding › image quality assessment › perceptual quality modeling
just noticeable difference modeling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in Charts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics › perception
perception in visualization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in Charts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics
infographic analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Exploring Visual Information Flows in Infographics · CHI 2020 |
Visualization and visual analytics › graphical perception
chart perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in Charts · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear mixed effects model · 0.6empirical study · 0.6gestalt principles · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Modeling Just Noticeable Differences in ChartsabstractOne of the fundamental tasks in visualization is to compare two or more visual elements. However, it is often difficult to visually differentiate graphical elements encoding a small difference in value, such as the heights of similar bars in bar chart or angles of similar sections in pie chart. Perceptual laws can be used in order to model when and how we perceive this difference. In this work, we model the perception of Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs), the minimum difference in visual attributes that allow faithfully comparing similar elements, in charts. Specifically, we explore the relation between JNDs and two major visual variables: the intensity of visual elements and the distance between them, and study it in three charts: bar chart, pie chart and bubble chart. Through an empirical study, we identify main effects on JND for distance in bar charts, intensity in pie charts, and both distance and intensity in bubble charts. By fitting a linear mixed effects model, we model JND and find that JND grows as the exponential function of variables. We highlight several usage scenarios that make use of the JND modeling in which elements below the fitted JND are detected and enhanced with secondary visual cues for better discrimination. Min Lu 0002, Joel Lanir, Chufeng Wang, Yucong Yao, Oliver Deussen, Hui Huang 0004 |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |
| 2020 | Exploring Visual Information Flows in InfographicsabstractInfographics are engaging visual representations that tell an informative story using a fusion of data and graphical elements. The large variety of infographic design poses a challenge for their high-level analysis. We use the concept of Visual Information Flow (VIF), which is the underlying semantic structure that links graphical elements to convey the information and story to the user. To explore VIF, we collected a repository of over 13K infographics. We use a deep neural network to identify visual elements related to information, agnostic to their various artistic appearances. We construct the VIF by automatically chaining these visual elements together based on Gestalt principles. Using this analysis, we characterize the VIF design space by a taxonomy of 12 different design patterns. Exploring in a real-world infographic dataset, we discuss the design space and potentials of VIF in light of this taxonomy. Min Lu 0002, Chufeng Wang, Joel Lanir, Nanxuan Zhao, Hanspeter Pfister, Daniel Cohen-Or, Hui Huang 0004 |
CHI | 2 |