Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Viivi Halla-aho

dblp:263/9167 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0369-5701ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
differential methylation analysis
0.412020
LuxUS: DNA methylation analysis using generalized linear mixed model with spatial correlation · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis
0.412020
LuxUS: DNA methylation analysis using generalized linear mixed model with spatial correlation · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenomics
0.412020
LuxUS: DNA methylation analysis using generalized linear mixed model with spatial correlation · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generalized linear mixed model · 0.4bisulfite sequencing analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modeling
abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the accepted standard for treatment effect estimation but they can be infeasible due to ethical reasons and prohibitive costs. Single-arm trials, where all patients belong to the treatment group, can be a viable alternative but require access to an external control group. We propose an identifiable deep latent-variable model for this scenario that can also account for missing covariate observations by modeling their structured missingness patterns. Our method uses amortized variational inference to learn both group-specific and identifiable shared latent representations, which can subsequently be used for {\em (i)} patient matching if treatment outcomes are not available for the treatment group, or for {\em (ii)} direct treatment effect estimation assuming outcomes are available for both groups. We evaluate the model on a public benchmark as well as on a data set consisting of a published RCT study and real-world electronic health records. Compared to previous methods, our results show improved performance both for direct treatment effect estimation as well as for effect estimation via patient matching.
Manuel Haußmann, Tran Minh Son Le, Viivi Halla-aho, Samu Kurki, Jussi Leinonen, Miika Koskinen, Samuel Kaski, Harri Lähdesmäki
AISTATS3
2022 Probabilistic modeling methods for cell-free DNA methylation based cancer classification
abstract
BACKGROUND: cfMeDIP-seq is a low-cost method for determining the DNA methylation status of cell-free DNA and it has been successfully combined with statistical methods for accurate cancer diagnostics. We investigate the diagnostic classification aspect by applying statistical tests and dimension reduction techniques for feature selection and probabilistic modeling for the cancer type classification, and we also study the effect of sequencing depth. METHODS: We experiment with a variety of statistical methods that use different feature selection and feature extraction methods as well as probabilistic classifiers for diagnostic decision making. We test the (moderated) t-tests and the Fisher's exact test for feature selection, principal component analysis (PCA) as well as iterative supervised PCA (ISPCA) for feature generation, and GLMnet and logistic regression methods with sparsity promoting priors for classification. Probabilistic programming language Stan is used to implement Bayesian inference for the probabilistic models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We compare overlaps of differentially methylated genomic regions as chosen by different feature selection methods, and evaluate probabilistic classifiers by evaluating the area under the receiver operating characteristic scores on discovery and validation cohorts. While we observe that many methods perform equally well as, and occasionally considerably better than, GLMnet that was originally proposed for cfMeDIP-seq based cancer classification, we also observed that performance of different methods vary across sequencing depths, cancer types and study cohorts. Overall, methods that seem robust and promising include Fisher's exact test and ISPCA for feature selection as well as a simple logistic regression model with the number of hyper and hypo-methylated regions as features.
Viivi Halla-aho, Harri Lähdesmäki
BMC Bioinform.1
2022 LuxRep: a technical replicate-aware method for bisulfite sequencing data analysis
abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation is commonly measured using bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq). The quality of a BS-seq library is measured by its bisulfite conversion efficiency. Libraries with low conversion rates are typically excluded from analysis resulting in reduced coverage and increased costs. RESULTS: We have developed a probabilistic method and software, LuxRep, that implements a general linear model and simultaneously accounts for technical replicates (libraries from the same biological sample) from different bisulfite-converted DNA libraries. Using simulations and actual DNA methylation data, we show that including technical replicates with low bisulfite conversion rates generates more accurate estimates of methylation levels and differentially methylated sites. Moreover, using variational inference speeds up computation time necessary for whole genome analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this work we show that taking into account technical replicates (i.e. libraries) of BS-seq data of varying bisulfite conversion rates, with their corresponding experimental parameters, improves methylation level estimation and differential methylation detection.
Maia H. Malonzo, Viivi Halla-aho, Mikko Konki, Riikka J. Lund, Harri Lähdesmäki
BMC Bioinform.2
2020 LuxUS: DNA methylation analysis using generalized linear mixed model with spatial correlation
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification, which has multiple functions. DNA methylation and its connections to diseases have been extensively studied in recent years. It is known that DNA methylation levels of neighboring cytosines are correlated and that differential DNA methylation typically occurs rather as regions instead of individual cytosine level. RESULTS: We have developed a generalized linear mixed model, LuxUS, that makes use of the correlation between neighboring cytosines to facilitate analysis of differential methylation. LuxUS implements a likelihood model for bisulfite sequencing data that accounts for experimental variation in underlying biochemistry. LuxUS can model both binary and continuous covariates, and mixed model formulation enables including replicate and cytosine random effects. Spatial correlation is included to the model through a cytosine random effect correlation structure. We show with simulation experiments that using the spatial correlation, we gain more power to the statistical testing of differential DNA methylation. Results with real bisulfite sequencing dataset show that LuxUS is able to detect biologically significant differentially methylated cytosines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The tool is available at https://github.com/hallav/LuxUS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Viivi Halla-aho, Harri Lähdesmäki
Bioinform.1