EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eliot Rudnick-Cohen
dblp:263/9532
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › task allocation
distributed task allocation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Decentralized Task Allocation in Multi-Agent Systems Using a Decentralized Genetic Algorithm · ICRA 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
task allocation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Decentralized Task Allocation in Multi-Agent Systems Using a Decentralized Genetic Algorithm · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evolutionary computation · 0.4decentralized genetic algorithm · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Decentralized Task Allocation in Multi-Agent Systems Using a Decentralized Genetic AlgorithmabstractIn multi-agent collaborative search missions, task allocation is required to determine which agents will perform which tasks. We propose a new approach for decentralized task allocation based on a decentralized genetic algorithm (GA). The approach parallelizes a genetic algorithm across the team of agents, making efficient use of their computational resources. In the proposed approach, the agents continuously search for and share better solutions during task execution. We conducted simulation experiments to compare the decentralized GA approach and several existing approaches. Two objectives were considered: a min-sum objective (minimizing the total distance traveled by all agents) and a min-time objective (minimizing the time to visit all locations of interest). The results showed that the decentralized GA approach yielded task allocations that were better on the min-time objective than those created by existing approaches and solutions that were reasonable on the min-sum objective. The decentralized GA improved min-time performance by an average of 5.6% on the larger instances. The results indicate that decentralized evolutionary approaches have a strong potential for solving the decentralized task allocation problem. Ruchir Patel, Eliot Rudnick-Cohen, Shapour Azarm, Michael W. Otte, Huan Xu 0002, Jeffrey W. Herrmann |
ICRA | 2 |