Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amit Sarker

dblp:264/1986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7883-6594ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › design study
visualization design study
0.912025
Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World Deployments · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.312025
Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World Deployments · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 1.7interview study · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World Deployments
abstract
As Differential Privacy (DP) transitions from theory to practice, visualization has surfaced as a catalyst in promoting acceptance and usage. Despite the potential of visualization tools to support differential privacy implementation, their development is limited by a lack of understanding of the overall deployment process, practitioner challenges, and the role of visual tools in real-world deployments. To narrow this gap, we interviewed 18 professionals from various backgrounds who regularly engage with differential privacy in their work. Our objectives were to understand the differential privacy implementation process and associated challenges; explore the actors (individuals involved in differential privacy implementation), how they use or struggle to use visualization; and identify the benefits and challenges of using visualization in the implementation process. Our results delineate the differential privacy implementation process into five distinct stages and highlight the main actors alongside the diverse visualization applications and shortcomings. We find that visualizations can be used to build foundational differential privacy knowledge, describe implementation parameters, and evaluate private outputs. However, the visualization strategies described often fail to address the diverse technical backgrounds and varied privacy and accuracy concerns of users, hindering effective communication between the different actors involved in the implementation process. From our findings, we propose three research directions: visualizations for setting and evaluating noise addition, evaluation of uncertainty visualization related to trust in differential privacy, and research focused on pedagogical visualizations for complex data science topics.
Liudas Panavas, Amit Sarker, Sara Di Bartolomeo, Ali Sarvghad, Cody Dunne, Narges Mahyar
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2
2023 A particle swarm inspired approach for continuous distributed constraint optimization problems
Moumita Choudhury, Amit Sarker, Samin Yaser, Md. Maruf Al Alif Khan, William Yeoh 0001, Md. Mosaddek Khan
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.2