Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amit Sarker
dblp:264/1986
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7883-6594ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › design study
visualization design study |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World Deployments · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World Deployments · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative analysis · 1.7interview study · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Illuminating the Landscape of Differential Privacy: An Interview Study on the Use of Visualization in Real-World DeploymentsabstractAs Differential Privacy (DP) transitions from theory to practice, visualization has surfaced as a catalyst in promoting acceptance and usage. Despite the potential of visualization tools to support differential privacy implementation, their development is limited by a lack of understanding of the overall deployment process, practitioner challenges, and the role of visual tools in real-world deployments. To narrow this gap, we interviewed 18 professionals from various backgrounds who regularly engage with differential privacy in their work. Our objectives were to understand the differential privacy implementation process and associated challenges; explore the actors (individuals involved in differential privacy implementation), how they use or struggle to use visualization; and identify the benefits and challenges of using visualization in the implementation process. Our results delineate the differential privacy implementation process into five distinct stages and highlight the main actors alongside the diverse visualization applications and shortcomings. We find that visualizations can be used to build foundational differential privacy knowledge, describe implementation parameters, and evaluate private outputs. However, the visualization strategies described often fail to address the diverse technical backgrounds and varied privacy and accuracy concerns of users, hindering effective communication between the different actors involved in the implementation process. From our findings, we propose three research directions: visualizations for setting and evaluating noise addition, evaluation of uncertainty visualization related to trust in differential privacy, and research focused on pedagogical visualizations for complex data science topics. Liudas Panavas, Amit Sarker, Sara Di Bartolomeo, Ali Sarvghad, Cody Dunne, Narges Mahyar |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 2 |
| 2023 | A particle swarm inspired approach for continuous distributed constraint optimization problems
Moumita Choudhury, Amit Sarker, Samin Yaser, Md. Maruf Al Alif Khan, William Yeoh 0001, Md. Mosaddek Khan |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 2 |