Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anthony Z. Liu
dblp:264/2652 · also Anthony Zhe Liu
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Vision and language · 18% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025 Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.3 | 2 | 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025 Towards Hybrid Human-AI Workflows for Unknown Unknown Detection · WWW 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › language-based planning
LLM-based planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue modeling
dialogue structure modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TOD-Flow: Modeling the Structure of Task-Oriented Dialogues · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › agent planning
embodied planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Language Models Plan from Pixels · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TOD-Flow: Modeling the Structure of Task-Oriented Dialogues · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
first-order logic |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Parameterized Task Structure for Generalization to Unseen Entities · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Parameterized Task Structure for Generalization to Unseen Entities · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Predictive Information Accelerates Learning in RL · NeurIPS 2020 |
Human-AI interaction
interactive machine learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Towards Hybrid Human-AI Workflows for Unknown Unknown Detection · WWW 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | TOD-Flow: Modeling the Structure of Task-Oriented Dialogues · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Language Models Plan from Pixels · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Parameterized Task Structure for Generalization to Unseen Entities · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Predictive Information Accelerates Learning in RL · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data generation · 0.9read-eval-print loop · 0.9large language model · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9counterfactual evaluation · 0.9distributionally robust optimization · 0.8concept set curation · 0.8visual observation encoding · 0.7prompt-based planning · 0.7graph inference · 0.7crowd worker pattern identification · 0.4classifier retraining · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language ModelsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making, but often struggle with complex, long-horizon planning tasks. Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and code to improve planning performance. However, code-based approaches can be error-prone and insufficient for handling ambiguous or unstructured data. To address these challenges, we propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive (it can utilize all the benefits of code) while also being dynamic (it can flexibly adapt from errors and use the LLM for soft reasoning). In REPL-Plan, an LLM solves tasks by interacting with a Read-Eval-Print Loop (REPL), which iteratively executes and evaluates code, similar to language shells or interactive code notebooks, allowing the model to flexibly correct errors and handle tasks dynamically. We demonstrate that REPL-Plan achieves strong results across various planning domains compared to previous methods. Anthony Z. Liu, Xinhe Wang 0001, Jacob Sansom, Sungryull Sohn, Jaekyeom Kim, Honglak Lee |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations?abstractSpurious correlations occur when models rely on non-essential features that coincidentally co-vary with target labels, leading to incorrect reasoning under distribution shift. We consider spurious correlations in multi-modal Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) pretrained on extensive and diverse datasets without explicit task supervision. We develop a benchmark by sourcing GPT-4o errors on real-world visual-question-answering (VQA) benchmarks, then curating a subset through LVLM-human annotation and synthetic counterfactual evaluation to identify errors caused by spurious correlations. This process yields SpuriVerse, a novel benchmark comprised of 124 distinct types of spurious correlations extracted from real-world datasets, each containing 1 realistic and 10 synthetic VQA samples for a total of 1364 multiple choice questions. We evaluate 15 open and closed-source LVLMs on SpuriVerse, finding that even state-of-the-art closed-source models struggle significantly, achieving at best only 35.0\% accuracy. Fine-tuning on synthetic examples that emphasize the spurious correlation improves performance to 78.4\%, suggesting that training on diverse spurious patterns generalizes to unseen situations: models appear to learn to avoid "shortcuts" and attend to the overall image context. Yiwei Yang 0009, Chung Peng Lee, Shangbin Feng, Dora Zhao, Bingbing Wen, Anthony Z. Liu, Yulia Tsvetkov, Bill Howe |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2024 | Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept CurationabstractDeep neural networks are prone to capture correlations between spurious attributes and class labels, leading to low accuracy on some combinations of class labels and spurious attribute values. When a spurious attribute represents a protected class, these low-accuracy groups can manifest discriminatory bias. Existing methods attempting to improve worst-group accuracy assume the training data, validation data, or both are reliably labeled by the spurious attribute. But a model may be perceived to be biased towards a concept that is not represented by pre-existing labels on the training data. In these situations, the spurious attribute must be defined with external information. We propose Concept Correction, a framework that represents a concept as a curated set of images from any source, then labels each training sample by its similarity to the concept set to control spurious correlations. For example, concept sets representing gender can be used to measure and control gender bias even without explicit labels. We demonstrate and evaluate an instance of the framework as Concept DRO, which uses concept sets to estimate group labels, then uses these labels to train with a state of the art distributively robust optimization objective. We show that Concept DRO outperforms existing methods that do not require labels of spurious attributes by up to 33.1 % on three image classification datasets and is competitive with the best methods that assume access to labels. We consider how the size and quality of the concept set influences performance and find that even smaller, manually curated sets of noisy AI-generated images are effective at controlling spurious correlations, suggesting that high-quality, reusable concept sets are easy to create and effective in reducing bias. Yiwei Yang 0009, Anthony Z. Liu, Robert Wolfe, Aylin Caliskan, Bill Howe |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2024 | Code Models are Zero-shot Precondition ReasonersabstractLajanugen Logeswaran, Sungryull Sohn, Yiwei Lyu, Anthony Liu, Dong-Ki Kim, Dongsub Shim, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Lajanugen Logeswaran, Sungryull Sohn, Yiwei Lyu 0001, Anthony Z. Liu, Dong-Ki Kim, Dongsub Shim, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee |
NAACL-HLT | 4 |
| 2023 | A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: Language Models Plan from PixelsabstractPlanning is an important capability of artificial agents that perform long-horizon tasks in real-world environments.In this work, we explore the use of pre-trained language models (PLMs) to reason about plan sequences from text instructions in embodied visual environments.Prior PLM based approaches for planning either assume observations are available in the form of text (e.g., provided by a captioning model), reason about plans from the instruction alone, or incorporate information about the visual environment in limited ways (such as a pre-trained affordance function).In contrast, we show that PLMs can accurately plan even when observations are directly encoded as input prompts for the PLM.We show that this simple approach outperforms prior approaches in experiments on the ALFWorld and VirtualHome benchmarks. Anthony Z. Liu, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Sungryull Sohn, Honglak Lee |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | TOD-Flow: Modeling the Structure of Task-Oriented DialoguesabstractTask-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems have become crucial components in interactive artificial intelligence applications.While recent advances have capitalized on pre-trained language models (PLMs), they exhibit limitations regarding transparency and controllability.To address these challenges, we propose a novel approach focusing on inferring the TOD-Flow graph from dialogue data annotated with dialog acts, uncovering the underlying task structure in the form of a graph.The inferred TOD-Flow graph can be easily integrated with any dialogue model to improve its prediction performance, transparency, and controllability.Our TOD-Flow graph learns what a model can, should, and should not predict, effectively reducing the search space and providing a rationale for the model's prediction.We show that the proposed TOD-Flow graph better resembles human-annotated graphs compared to prior approaches.Furthermore, when combined with several dialogue policies and end-to-end dialogue models, we demonstrate that our approach significantly improves dialog act classification and end-to-end response generation performance in the Multi-WOZ and SGD benchmarks.Code available Sungryull Sohn, Yiwei Lyu 0001, Anthony Z. Liu, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Dong-Ki Kim, Dongsub Shim, Honglak Lee |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | Learning Parameterized Task Structure for Generalization to Unseen EntitiesabstractReal world tasks are hierarchical and compositional. Tasks can be composed of multiple subtasks (or sub-goals) that are dependent on each other. These subtasks are defined in terms of entities (e.g., "apple", "pear") that can be recombined to form new subtasks (e.g., "pickup apple", and "pickup pear"). To solve these tasks efficiently, an agent must infer subtask dependencies (e.g. an agent must execute "pickup apple" before "place apple in pot"), and generalize the inferred dependencies to new subtasks (e.g. "place apple in pot" is similar to "place apple in pan"). Moreover, an agent may also need to solve unseen tasks, which can involve unseen entities. To this end, we formulate parameterized subtask graph inference (PSGI), a method for modeling subtask dependencies using first-order logic with factored entities. To facilitate this, we learn parameter attributes in a zero-shot manner, which are used as quantifiers (e.g. is_pickable(X)) for the factored subtask graph. We show this approach accurately learns the latent structure on hierarchical and compositional tasks more efficiently than prior work, and show PSGI can generalize by modelling structure on subtasks unseen during adaptation. Anthony Z. Liu, Sungryull Sohn, Mahdi Qazwini, Honglak Lee |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Predictive Information Accelerates Learning in RLabstractThe Predictive Information is the mutual information between the past and the future, I(Xpast; Xfuture). We hypothesize that capturing the predictive information is useful in RL, since the ability to model what will happen next is necessary for success on many tasks. To test our hypothesis, we train Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) agents from pixels with an auxiliary task that learns a compressed representation of the predictive information of the RL environment dynamics using a contrastive version of the Conditional Entropy Bottleneck (CEB) objective. We refer to these as Predictive Information SAC (PI-SAC) agents. We show that PI-SAC agents can substantially improve sample efficiency over challenging baselines on tasks from the DM Control suite of continuous control environments. We evaluate PI-SAC agents by comparing against uncompressed PI-SAC agents, other compressed and uncompressed agents, and SAC agents directly trained from pixels. Our implementation is given on GitHub. Kuang-Huei Lee, Ian Fischer, Anthony Z. Liu, Yijie Guo, Honglak Lee, John F. Canny, Sergio Guadarrama |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Towards Hybrid Human-AI Workflows for Unknown Unknown DetectionabstractPredictive models are susceptible to errors called unknown unknowns, in which the model assigns incorrect labels to instances with high confidence. These commonly arise when training data does not represent variations of a class encountered at model deployment. Prior work showed that crowd workers can identify instances of unknown unknowns, but asking the crowd to identify a sufficient number of individual instances can be costly to acquire [2]. Instead, this paper presents an approach that leverages people’s ability to find patterns to retrain classifiers more effectively with fewer examples. We ask crowd workers to suggest and verify patterns in unknown unknowns. We then use these patterns to train an expansion classifier to identify additional examples from existing data that the primary classifier has encountered (and potentially misclassified) in the past. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms existing unknown unknown detection methods at improving classifier performance. This work is the first to leverage crowds to identify error patterns in large datasets to improve ML training. Anthony Z. Liu, Santiago Guerra, Isaac Fung, Gabriel Matute, Ece Kamar, Walter S. Lasecki |
WWW | 1 |