EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kai Müller
dblp:264/2969
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning environment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production Lines · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward shaping · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LineFlow: A Framework to Learn Active Control of Production LinesabstractMany production lines require active control mechanisms, such as adaptive routing, worker reallocation, and rescheduling, to maintain optimal performance. However, designing these control systems is challenging for various reasons, and while reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promise in addressing these challenges, a standardized and general framework is still lacking. In this work, we introduce LineFlow, an extensible, open-source Python framework for simulating production lines of arbitrary complexity and training RL agents to control them. To demonstrate the capabilities and to validate the underlying theoretical assumptions of LineFlow, we formulate core subproblems of active line control in ways that facilitate mathematical analysis. For each problem, we provide optimal solutions for comparison. We benchmark state-of-the-art RL algorithms and show that the learned policies approach optimal performance in well-understood scenarios. However, for more complex, industrial-scale production lines, RL still faces significant challenges, highlighting the need for further research in areas such as reward shaping, curriculum learning, and hierarchical control. Kai Müller, Martin Wenzel, Tobias Windisch |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Sustainability in the Internet of Production: Interdisciplinary Opportunities and ChallengesabstractThe vision of the Internet of Production (loP) is focused on optimizing manufacturing processes, with the help of Industry 4.0 technologies (14Ts). However, considering global megatrends such as climate change and the need to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is a growing imperative for the manufacturing industry to become more sustainable. This opens the door to transforming the IoP into an Internet of Sustainable Production (loSP). Accordingly, this paper proposes a novel four-step loSP-framework that establishes an Information System (IS) allowing researchers and practitioners to acknowledge and adapt to the interconnected nature of sustainability. Further, to test its applicability, an inter- and cross-disciplinary perspective is adopted to illustrate case-related challenges, opportunities, and pathways - revealed by the proposed framework - in the example of a digital economy for sustainability data, strategic design of global production networks, human-robot collaboration, digital photonic production, and the textile industry. Together, the framework demonstrates the usefulness of generating holistic information on the interconnected nature of sustainability derived from process-specific and contextualized data, while simultaneously assessing the framework's utilization for sustainability, as well as the sustainability of its use. Sebastian Bernhard, Sebastian Pütz, Calvin Röhl, Ralph Baier, Philipp Brauner, Ester Christou, Hannah Dammers, Roman Flaig, Leon M. Gorißen, Jan-Christoph Heilinger, Christian Hinke, István Koren, Dirk Lüttgens, Michael Millan, Kai Müller, Alexander Schollemann, Luisa Vervier, Thomas Gries, Alexander Mertens, Saskia K. Nagel, Frank T. Piller, Günther Schuh, Martina Ziefle, Verena Nitsch, Carmen Leicht-Scholten |
ISTAS | 15 |
| 2020 | Explainable Priority Assessment of Software-Defects using Categorical Features at SAP HANAabstractWe want to automate priority assessment of software defects. To do so we provide a tool which uses an explainability-driven framework and classical machine learning algorithms to keep the decisions transparent. Differing from other approaches we only use objective and categorical fields from the bug tracking system as features. This makes our approach lightweight and extremely fast. We perform binary classification with priority labels corresponding to deadlines. Additionally, we evaluate the tool on real data to ensure good performance in the practical use case. Luca Lenz, Michael Felderer, Sascha Schwedes, Kai Müller |
EASE | 4 |