Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Min-Ching Lin

dblp:264/4509 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 67% Integrated circuit design · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › placement
detailed placement
0.912025
Secondary-Power-Cell-Aware Detailed Placement in Multiple Power Domain Designs · DAC 2025
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.912025
Secondary-Power-Cell-Aware Detailed Placement in Multiple Power Domain Designs · DAC 2025
Integrated circuit design
power delivery network
0.912025
Secondary-Power-Cell-Aware Detailed Placement in Multiple Power Domain Designs · DAC 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integer linear programming · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Secondary-Power-Cell-Aware Detailed Placement in Multiple Power Domain Designs
abstract
Using multiple power domains is a common technique to achieve significant power savings in modern designs. However, providing power to cross-domain cells is challenging at advanced technology nodes, due to strict IR drop constraints and competition for routing resources between secondary power routing and signal routing. Despite its importance, this issue has received limited attention in recent literature. In this paper, we propose a detailed placement method that accounts for secondary power routing. Our approach employs an integer linear programming (ILP) model, complemented by targeted adjustments to the placement of cross-domain cells, to optimize the efficiency of secondary power routing. We validate our results with commercial design tools, showing that our approach effectively improves secondary power routing performance by reducing the wirelength of the secondary power distribution network (PDN) and decreasing violations due to secondary PDN constraints.
Shao-Yun Fang, Kai-Chuan Yang, Min-Ching Lin
DAC4
2020 Joining Illumina paired-end reads for classifying phylogenetic marker sequences
abstract
BACKGROUND: Illumina sequencing of a marker gene is popular in metagenomic studies. However, Illumina paired-end (PE) reads sometimes cannot be merged into single reads for subsequent analysis. When mergeable PE reads are limited, one can simply use only first reads for taxonomy annotation, but that wastes information in the second reads. Presumably, including second reads should improve taxonomy annotation. However, a rigorous investigation of how best to do this and how much can be gained has not been reported. RESULTS: We evaluated two methods of joining as opposed to merging PE reads into single reads for taxonomy annotation using simulated data with sequencing errors. Our rigorous evaluation involved several top classifiers (RDP classifier, SINTAX, and two alignment-based methods) and realistic benchmark datasets. For most classifiers, read joining ameliorated the impact of sequencing errors and improved the accuracy of taxonomy predictions. For alignment-based top-hit classifiers, rearranging the reference sequences is recommended to avoid improper alignments of joined reads. For word-counting classifiers, joined reads could be compared to the original reference for classification. We also applied read joining to our own real MiSeq PE data of nasal microbiota of asthmatic children. Before joining, trimming low quality bases was necessary for optimizing taxonomy annotation and sequence clustering. We then showed that read joining increased the amount of effective data for taxonomy annotation. Using these joined trimmed reads, we were able to identify two promising bacterial genera that might be associated with asthma exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: When mergeable PE reads are limited, joining them into single reads for taxonomy annotation is always recommended. Reference sequences may need to be rearranged accordingly depending on the classifier. Read joining also relaxes the constraint on primer selection, and thus may unleash the full capacity of Illumina PE data for taxonomy annotation. Our work provides guidance for fully utilizing PE data of a marker gene when mergeable reads are limited.
Tsunglin Liu, Chen-Yu Chen, An Chen-Deng, Jiu-Yao Wang, Yung-I Hou, Min-Ching Lin
BMC Bioinform.7