EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johan Bay
dblp:264/4856
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 80% Program verification · 20% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › type systems › security type systems
information-flow type systems |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Programming languages and type systems
logical relations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Programming languages and type systems › information flow control
noninterference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Program verification
program logic |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Programming languages and type systems
type systems |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Systems and software security
information flow control |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterference · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modal weakest preconditions · 1.0iris · 1.0coq · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mechanized logical relations for termination-insensitive noninterferenceabstractWe present an expressive information-flow control type system with recursive types, existential types, label polymorphism, and impredicative type polymorphism for a higher-order programming language with higher-order state. We give a novel semantic model of this type system and show that well-typed programs satisfy termination-insensitive noninterference. Our semantic approach supports compositional integration of syntactically well-typed and syntactically ill-typed---but semantically sound---components, which we demonstrate through several interesting examples. We define our model using logical relations on top of the Iris program logic framework; to capture termination-insensitivity, we develop a novel language-agnostic theory of Modal Weakest Preconditions. We formalize all of our theory and examples in the Coq proof assistant. Simon Oddershede Gregersen, Johan Bay, Amin Timany, Lars Birkedal |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |
| 2020 | Reconciling progress-insensitive noninterference and declassification
Johan Bay, Aslan Askarov |
CSF | 1 |