Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dan Braun

dblp:264/4978 · also Daniel Braun 0007 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.812024
Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.812024
Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding › dictionary learning
sparse dictionary learning
0.812024
Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

KL divergence minimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Parameterized Synthetic Text Generation with SimpleStories
abstract
We present SimpleStories, a large synthetic story dataset in simple language, consisting of 2 million samples each in English and Japanese. Through parameterizing prompts at multiple levels of abstraction, we achieve control over story characteristics at scale, inducing syntactic and semantic diversity. Ablations on a newly trained tiny model suite then show improved sample efficiency and model interpretability in comparison with the TinyStories dataset. We open-source all constituent parts of model creation, hoping to enable novel ways to study the end-to-end training process. As a byproduct, we move the frontier with regards to the fewest-parameter language model that outputs grammatical English.
Lennart Finke, Chandan Sreedhara, Thomas Dooms, Mat Allen, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Noa Nabeshima, Thomas Marshall, Dan Braun
NeurIPS8
2024 Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning
abstract
Identifying the features learned by neural networks is a core challenge in mechanistic interpretability. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs), which learn a sparse, overcomplete dictionary that reconstructs a network's internal activations, have been used to identify these features. However, SAEs may learn more about the structure of the datatset than the computational structure of the network. There is therefore only indirect reason to believe that the directions found in these dictionaries are functionally important to the network. We propose end-to-end (e2e) sparse dictionary learning, a method for training SAEs that ensures the features learned are functionally important by minimizing the KL divergence between the output distributions of the original model and the model with SAE activations inserted. Compared to standard SAEs, e2e SAEs offer a Pareto improvement: They explain more network performance, require fewer total features, and require fewer simultaneously active features per datapoint, all with no cost to interpretability. We explore geometric and qualitative differences between e2e SAE features and standard SAE features. E2e dictionary learning brings us closer to methods that can explain network behavior concisely and accurately. We release our library for training e2e SAEs and reproducing our analysis at https://github.com/ApolloResearch/e2e_sae.
Dan Braun, Jordan Taylor, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Lee Sharkey
NeurIPS1