Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pinan Chen

dblp:264/5354 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 83% Distributed systems · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter operations
AIOps
0.412020
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud infrastructure
cloud infrastructure reliability
0.412020
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter operations
node failure prediction
0.412020
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2020
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › proactive fault tolerance
failure prediction
0.112020
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2020
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112020
Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.4data analytics · 0.4AIOps · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 On Workload-Aware DRAM Failure Prediction in Large-Scale Data Centers
abstract
DRAM failures are one of the major hardware threats to the reliability of large-scale data centers since the uncorrectable errors in DRAMs may cause servers to shut down. Existing works try to solve this problem by predicting DRAM failures in advance with Machine Learning models. In these works, correctable errors (CEs) are generally deemed as the most important feature. The major reason behind CEs' emergence is the accumulated stress caused by intensive workloads. Moreover, defective DRAMs will not manifest themselves as system errors until the defective cells are accessed by some specific workloads. Therefore, the running workloads on a server are also important for DRAM failure prediction. In this paper, we focus on the impact of workloads on DRAM failures. We design the workload features from both macroscopical and microscopical aspects, i.e. node-level performance metrics and cell-level DRAM access pattern, respectively. Furthermore, we propose Hierarchical DRAM Error Code (HiDEC) to represent the DRAM access pattern. We leverage several Decision Tree-based models for DRAM failure prediction to highlight the generality of our designed features. Experiments are carried out based on the dataset collected from a real-world commercial data center. The results show that both macroscopic and microscopic features can bring significant improvements to the prediction performance.
Xingyi Wang, Yu Li 0007, Yiquan Chen, Yin Du, Yuzhong Zhang, Pinan Chen, Wenjun Song, Qiang Xu 0001, Li Jiang 0002
VTS8
2020 Predicting Node Failures in an Ultra-Large-Scale Cloud Computing Platform: An AIOps Solution
abstract
Many software services today are hosted on cloud computing platforms, such as Amazon EC2, due to many benefits like reduced operational costs. However, node failures in these platforms can impact the availability of their hosted services and potentially lead to large financial losses. Predicting node failures before they actually occur is crucial, as it enables DevOps engineers to minimize their impact by performing preventative actions. However, such predictions are hard due to many challenges like the enormous size of the monitoring data and the complexity of the failure symptoms. AIOps ( A rtificial I ntelligence for IT Op eration s ), a recently introduced approach in DevOps, leverages data analytics and machine learning to improve the quality of computing platforms in a cost-effective manner. However, the successful adoption of such AIOps solutions requires much more than a top-performing machine learning model. Instead, AIOps solutions must be trustable, interpretable, maintainable, scalable, and evaluated in context. To cope with these challenges, in this article we report our process of building an AIOps solution for predicting node failures for an ultra-large-scale cloud computing platform at Alibaba. We expect our experiences to be of value to researchers and practitioners, who are interested in building and maintaining AIOps solutions for large-scale cloud computing platforms.
Yangguang Li 0003, Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang, Heng Li 0007, Ahmed E. Hassan, Ruirui Huang, Zhengda Zeng, Pinan Chen
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.9