Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaopeng Guo
dblp:264/5456
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 65% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformers · ICCV 2021 Differentiable Dynamic Wirings for Neural Networks · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
dynamic neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentiable Dynamic Wirings for Neural Networks · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search › network topology search
network connectivity learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentiable Dynamic Wirings for Neural Networks · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformers · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
channel pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › DNN pruning
differentiable pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual Transformers · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Differentiable Dynamic Wirings for Neural Networks · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-attention · 0.5instance-aware routing · 0.5differentiable architecture search · 0.5convolution · 0.5markov process · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4budget regularization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ArcMask: a robust and fast image-based method for high-speed railway pantograph-catenary arcing instance segmentation
Wei Quan 0003, Shaopeng Guo, Xuemin Lu, Guoxin Gu, Wenjing Cheng, Long Yu 0002 |
Neural Comput. Appl. | 2 |
| 2021 | Incorporating Convolution Designs into Visual TransformersabstractMotivated by the success of Transformers in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, there emerge some attempts (e.g., ViT and DeiT) to apply Transformers to the vision domain. However, pure Transformer architectures often require a large amount of training data or extra supervision to obtain comparable performance with convolutional neural networks (CNNs). To overcome these limitations, we analyze the potential drawbacks when directly borrowing Transformer architectures from NLP. Then we propose a new Convolution-enhanced image Transformer (CeiT) which combines the advantages of CNNs in extracting low-level features, strengthening locality, and the advantages of Transformers in establishing long-range dependencies. Three modifications are made to the original Transformer: 1) instead of the straightforward tokenization from raw input images, we design an Image-to-Tokens (I2T) module that extracts patches from generated low-level features; 2) the feed-froward network in each encoder block is replaced with a Locally-enhanced Feed-Forward (LeFF) layer that promotes the correlation among neighboring tokens in the spatial dimension; 3) a Layer-wise Class token Attention (LCA) is attached at the top of the Transformer that utilizes the multi-level representations.Experimental results on ImageNet and seven down-stream tasks show the effectiveness and generalization ability of CeiT compared with previous Transformers and state- of-the-art CNNs, without requiring a large amount of training data and extra CNN teachers. Besides, CeiT models demonstrate better convergence with 3× fewer training iterations, which can reduce the training cost significantly1. Shaopeng Guo, Ziwei Liu 0002, Aojun Zhou, Fengwei Yu |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | Differentiable Dynamic Wirings for Neural NetworksabstractA standard practice of deploying deep neural networks is to apply the same architecture to all the input instances. However, a fixed architecture may not be suitable for different data with high diversity. To boost the model capacity, existing methods usually employ larger convolutional kernels or deeper network layers, which incurs prohibitive computational costs. In this paper, we address this issue by proposing Differentiable Dynamic Wirings (DDW), which learns the instance-aware connectivity that creates different wiring patterns for different instances. 1) Specifically, the network is initialized as a complete directed acyclic graph, where the nodes represent convolutional blocks and the edges represent the connection paths. 2) We generate edge weights by a learnable module, Router, and select the edges whose weights are larger than a threshold, to adjust the connectivity of the neural network structure. 3) Instead of using the same path of the network, DDW aggregates features dynamically in each node, which allows the network to have more representation power.To facilitate effective training, we further represent the network connectivity of each sample as an adjacency matrix. The matrix is updated to aggregate features in the forward pass, cached in the memory, and used for gradient computing in the backward pass. We validate the effectiveness of our approach with several mainstream architectures, including MobileNetV2, ResNet, ResNeXt, and RegNet. Extensive experiments are performed on ImageNet classification and COCO object detection, which demonstrates the effectiveness and generalization ability of our approach. Quanquan Li, Shaopeng Guo, Dapeng Chen, Aojun Zhou, Fengwei Yu, Ziwei Liu 0002 |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2020 | DMCP: Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning for Neural NetworksabstractRecent works imply that the channel pruning can be regarded as searching optimal sub-structure from unpruned networks. However, existing works based on this observation require training and evaluating a large number of structures, which limits their application. In this paper, we propose a novel differentiable method for channel pruning, named Differentiable Markov Channel Pruning (DMCP), to efficiently search the optimal sub-structure. Our method is differentiable and can be directly optimized by gradient descent with respect to standard task loss and budget regularization (e.g. FLOPs constraint). In DMCP, we model the channel pruning as a Markov process, in which each state represents for retaining the corresponding channel during pruning, and transitions between states denote the pruning process. In the end, our method is able to implicitly select the proper number of channels in each layer by the Markov process with optimized transitions. To validate the effectiveness of our method, we perform extensive experiments on Imagenet with ResNet and MobilenetV2. Results show our method can achieve consistent improvement than state-of-the-art pruning methods in various FLOPs settings. Shaopeng Guo, Quanquan Li |
CVPR | 1 |