Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luis Müller

dblp:264/5619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Graph learning · 81% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 3%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer
2.432025
Generalizable Insights for Graph Transformers in Theory and Practice · NeurIPS 2025
Towards Principled Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power
1.522024
Towards Principled Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › expressive power
weisfeiler-leman hierarchy
1.522024
Towards Principled Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding
1.122025
Generalizable Insights for Graph Transformers in Theory and Practice · NeurIPS 2025
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › message passing
higher-order message passing
0.812024
Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman · ICML 2024
Computational science and engineering
foundation models
0.812024
Towards Foundational Models for Molecular Learning on Large-Scale Multi-Task Datasets · ICLR 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecular machine learning
0.812024
Towards Foundational Models for Molecular Learning on Large-Scale Multi-Task Datasets · ICLR 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction
0.812024
Towards Foundational Models for Molecular Learning on Large-Scale Multi-Task Datasets · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
few-shot transfer
0.312025
Generalizable Insights for Graph Transformers in Theory and Practice · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.212024
Towards Principled Graph Transformers · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 1.6attention mechanism · 0.9weisfeiler-leman test · 0.8self-attention · 0.8multi-task training · 0.8graph transformer · 0.8attention · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generalizable Insights for Graph Transformers in Theory and Practice
abstract
Graph Transformers (GTs) have shown strong empirical performance, yet current architectures vary widely in their use of attention mechanisms, positional embeddings (PEs), and expressivity. Existing expressivity results are often tied to specific design choices and lack comprehensive empirical validation on large-scale data. This leaves a gap between theory and practice, preventing generalizable insights that exceed particular application domains. Here, we propose the Generalized-Distance Transformer (GDT), a GT architecture using standard attention that incorporates many advancements for GTs from recent years, and develop a fine-grained understanding of the GDT's representation power in terms of attention and PEs. Through extensive experiments, we identify design choices that consistently perform well across various applications, tasks, and model scales, demonstrating strong performance in a few-shot transfer setting without fine-tuning. Our evaluation covers over eight million graphs with roughly 270M tokens across diverse domains, including image-based object detection, molecular property prediction, code summarization, and out-of-distribution algorithmic reasoning. We distill our theoretical and practical findings into several generalizable insights about effective GT design, training, and inference.
Timo Stoll, Luis Müller, Christopher Morris 0001
NeurIPS2
2024 Towards Foundational Models for Molecular Learning on Large-Scale Multi-Task Datasets
abstract
Recently, pre-trained foundation models have enabled significant advancements in multiple fields. In molecular machine learning, however, where datasets are often hand-curated, and hence typically small, the lack of datasets with labeled features, and codebases to manage those datasets, has hindered the development of foundation models. In this work, we present seven novel datasets categorized by size into three distinct categories: ToyMix, LargeMix and UltraLarge. These datasets push the boundaries in both the scale and the diversity of supervised labels for molecular learning. They cover nearly 100 million molecules and over 3000 sparsely defined tasks, totaling more than 13 billion individual labels of both quantum and biological nature. In comparison, our datasets contain 300 times more data points than the widely used OGB-LSC PCQM4Mv2 dataset, and 13 times more than the quantum-only QM1B dataset. In addition, to support the development of foundational models based on our proposed datasets, we present the Graphium graph machine learning library which simplifies the process of building and training molecular machine learning models for multi-task and multi-level molecular datasets. Finally, we present a range of baseline results as a starting point of multi-task and multi-level training on these datasets. Empirically, we observe that performance on low-resource biological datasets show improvement by also training on large amounts of quantum data. This indicates that there may be potential in multi-task and multi-level training of a foundation model and fine-tuning it to resource-constrained downstream tasks. The Graphium library is publicly available on Github and the dataset links are available in Part 1 and Part 2.
Dominique Beaini, Shenyang Huang, Joao Alex Cunha, Gabriela Moisescu-Pareja, Oleksandr Dymov, Samuel Maddrell-Mander, Callum McLean, Frederik Wenkel, Luis Müller, Jama Hussein Mohamud, Ali Parviz, Michael Craig, Michal Koziarski, Jiarui Lu, Zhaocheng Zhu, Cristian Gabellini, Kerstin Kläser 0001, Josef Dean, Cas Wognum, Maciej Sypetkowski, Guillaume Rabusseau, Reihaneh Rabbany, Jian Tang 0005, Christopher Morris 0001, Mirco Ravanelli, Guy Wolf, Prudencio Tossou, Hadrien Mary, Therence Bois, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Blazej Banaszewski, Chad Martin, Dominic Masters
ICLR10
2024 Aligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman
abstract
Graph neural network architectures aligned with the $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler–Leman ($k$-WL) hierarchy offer theoretically well-understood expressive power. However, these architectures often fail to deliver state-of-the-art predictive performance on real-world graphs, limiting their practical utility. While recent works aligning graph transformer architectures with the $k$-WL hierarchy have shown promising empirical results, employing transformers for higher orders of $k$ remains challenging due to a prohibitive runtime and memory complexity of self-attention as well as impractical architectural assumptions, such as an infeasible number of attention heads. Here, we advance the alignment of transformers with the $k$-WL hierarchy, showing stronger expressivity results for each $k$, making them more feasible in practice. In addition, we develop a theoretical framework that allows the study of established positional encodings such as Laplacian PEs and SPE. We evaluate our transformers on the large-scale PCQM4Mv2 dataset, showing competitive predictive performance with the state-of-the-art and demonstrating strong downstream performance when fine-tuning them on small-scale molecular datasets.
Luis Müller, Christopher Morris 0001
ICML1
2024 Towards Principled Graph Transformers
abstract
The expressive power of graph learning architectures based on the $k$-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman ($k$-WL) hierarchy is well understood. However, such architectures often fail to deliver solid predictive performance on real-world tasks, limiting their practical impact. In contrast, global attention-based models such as graph transformers demonstrate strong performance in practice, but comparing their expressive power with the $k$-WL hierarchy remains challenging, particularly since these architectures rely on positional or structural encodings for their expressivity and predictive performance. To address this, we show that the recently proposed Edge Transformer, a global attention model operating on node pairs instead of nodes, has 3-WL expressive power when provided with the right tokenization. Empirically, we demonstrate that the Edge Transformer surpasses other theoretically aligned architectures regarding predictive performance while not relying on positional or structural encodings.
Luis Müller, Daniel Kusuma, Blai Bonet, Christopher Morris 0001
NeurIPS1