Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pedro R. A. S. Bassi
dblp:264/5743
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8995-9423ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 56% Vision and language · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 5% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › domain-specific vision-language model
medical vision-language |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › medical report generation
radiology report generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
tumor segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical report generation
CT report generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor Datasets · ICCV 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Touchstone Benchmark: Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating AI Algorithms for Medical Segmentation? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
medical image segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Touchstone Benchmark: Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating AI Algorithms for Medical Segmentation? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Touchstone Benchmark: Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating AI Algorithms for Medical Segmentation? · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 1.7anatomy-aware segmentation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Text-Driven Tumor SynthesisabstractTumor synthesis can generate challenging cases that AI often misses or over-detects. Training on these cases improves AI performance. However, most existing synthesis methods are either unconditional- generating images from random variables-or conditioned only on tumor shape. As a result, they lack control over clinically important tumor characteristics, such as texture, heterogeneity, boundary, and pathology. The generated tumors are therefore overly similar or duplicates of existing training cases, failing to effectively address AI's weaknesses. We propose a new text-driven tumor synthesis approach, termed TextoMorph, that provides textual control over tumor characteristics in conjunction with mask control. This approach is particularly beneficial for examples that confuse the AI the most, such as early tumor detection (improving Sensitivity by + 6.5%), tumor segmentation for precise radiotherapy (improving NSD by + 3.1%), and classification between benign and malignant tumors (improving Sensitivity by + 8.2%). By incorporating text mined from radiology reports into the synthesis process, we increase the variability and controllability of the synthetic tumors to target AI's failure cases more precisely. Moreover, TextoMorph uses contrastive learning across different texts and CT scans, significantly reducing dependence on scarce image-report pairs (only 141 pairs used in this study) by leveraging a large corpus of 34,035 radiology reports. Finally, we have developed rigorous tests to evaluate synthetic tumors, showing that our synthetic tumors is realistic and diverse in texture, heterogeneity, boundary, and pathology. Code and models are available at https://github.com/MrGiovanni/TextoMorph. Yi Shuai, Qi Chen 0014, Dong Yang 0005, Can Zhao 0001, Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Daguang Xu, Kang Wang 0016, Yang Yang 0009, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 9 |
| 2025 | RadGPT: Constructing 3D Image-Text Tumor DatasetsabstractWith over 85 million CT scans performed annually in the United States, creating tumor-related reports is a challenging and time-consuming task for radiologists. To address this need, we present RadGPT, an Anatomy-Aware Vision-Language AI Agent for generating detailed reports from CT scans. RadGPT first segments tumors, including benign cysts and malignant tumors, and their surrounding anatomical structures, then transforms this information into both structured reports and narrative reports. These reports provide tumor size, shape, location, attenuation, volume, and interactions with surrounding blood vessels and organs. Extensive evaluation on unseen hospitals shows that RadGPT can produce accurate reports, with high sensitivity/specificity for small tumor (<2 cm) detection: 80/73% for liver tumors, 92/78% for kidney tumors, and 77/77% for pancreatic tumors. For large tumors, sensitivity ranges from 89% to 97%. The results significantly surpass the state-of-the-art in abdominal CT report generation. RadGPT generated reports for 17 public datasets. Through radiologist review and refinement, we have ensured the reports' accuracy, and created the first publicly available image-text 3D medical dataset, comprising over 1.8 million text tokens and 2.7 million images from 9,262 CT scans, including 2,947 tumor scans/reports of 8,562 tumor instances. Our reports can: (1) localize tumors in eight liver sub-segments and three pancreatic sub-segments annotated per-voxel; (2) determine pancreatic tumor stage (T1-T4) in 260 reports; and (3) present individual analyses of multiple tumors--rare in human-made reports. Importantly, 948 of the reports are for early-stage tumors. Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Mehmet Can Yavuz, Ibrahim Ethem Hamamci, Sezgin Er, Xiaoxi Chen, Bjoern Menze, Sergio Decherchi, Andrea Cavalli, Kang Wang 0016, Yang Yang 0009, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2025 | Learning Segmentation from Radiology Reports
Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Jieneng Chen, Zheren Zhu, Sergio Decherchi, Andrea Cavalli, Kang Wang 0016, Yang Yang 0009, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
MICCAI (5) | 1 |
| 2025 | PanTS: The Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation DatasetabstractPanTS is a large-scale, multi-institutional dataset curated to advance research in pancreatic CT analysis. It contains 36,390 CT scans from 145 medical centers, with expert-validated, voxel-wise annotations of over 993,000 anatomical structures, covering pancreatic tumors, pancreas head, body, and tail, and 24 surrounding anatomical structures such as vascular/skeletal structures and abdominal/thoracic organs. Each scan includes metadata such as patient age, sex, diagnosis, contrast phase, in-plane spacing, slice thickness, etc. AI models trained on PanTS achieve significantly better performance in pancreatic tumor detection, localization, and segmentation than those trained on existing public datasets. Our analysis indicates that these gains are directly attributable to the 16× larger-scale tumor annotations and indirectly supported by the 24 additional surrounding anatomical structures. As the largest and most comprehensive resource of its kind, PanTS offers a new benchmark for developing and evaluating AI models in pancreatic CT analysis. Xinze Zhou, Qi Chen 0014, Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Xiaoxi Chen, Zheren Zhu, Kang Wang 0016, Yang Yang 0009, Yucheng Tang, Daguang Xu, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2024 | Touchstone Benchmark: Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating AI Algorithms for Medical Segmentation?abstractHow can we test AI performance? This question seems trivial, but it isn't. Standard benchmarks often have problems such as in-distribution and small-size test sets, oversimplified metrics, unfair comparisons, and short-term outcome pressure. As a consequence, good performance on standard benchmarks does not guarantee success in real-world scenarios. To address these problems, we present Touchstone, a large-scale collaborative segmentation benchmark of 9 types of abdominal organs. This benchmark is based on 5,195 training CT scans from 76 hospitals around the world and 5,903 testing CT scans from 11 additional hospitals. This diverse test set enhances the statistical significance of benchmark results and rigorously evaluates AI algorithms across various out-of-distribution scenarios. We invited 14 inventors of 19 AI algorithms to train their algorithms, while our team, as a third party, independently evaluated these algorithms on three test sets. In addition, we also evaluated pre-existing AI frameworks---which, differing from algorithms, are more flexible and can support different algorithms—including MONAI from NVIDIA, nnU-Net from DKFZ, and numerous other open-source frameworks. We are committed to expanding this benchmark to encourage more innovation of AI algorithms for the medical domain. Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Yucheng Tang, Fabian Isensee, Zifu Wang, Jieneng Chen, Yu-Cheng Chou, Yannick Kirchhoff, Maximilian Rokuss, Ziyan Huang, Jin Ye 0002, Junjun He, Tassilo Wald, Constantin Ulrich, Michael Baumgartner 0001, Saikat Roy, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Paul F. Jaeger, Yiwen Ye, Yutong Xie 0001, Ziyang Chen 0003, Yong Xia 0001, Zhaohu Xing, Lei Zhu 0003, Yousef Sadegheih, Afshin Bozorgpour, Pratibha Kumari 0001, Reza Azad, Dorit Merhof, Yuxin Du 0001, Fan Bai 0008, Tiejun Huang 0001, Bo Zhao 0015, Xiaomeng Li 0001, Hanxue Gu, Haoyu Dong 0003, Maciej A. Mazurowski, Saumya Gupta, Linshan Wu, Jiaxin Zhuang, Hao Chen 0011, Holger Roth, Daguang Xu, Matthew B. Blaschko, Sergio Decherchi, Andrea Cavalli, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | AbdomenAtlas: A large-scale, detailed-annotated, & multi-center dataset for efficient transfer learning and open algorithmic benchmarking
Chongyu Qu, Xiaoxi Chen, Pedro R. A. S. Bassi, Yijia Shi, Yuxiang Lai, Qian Yu 0012, Huimin Xue, Yixiong Chen, Xiaorui Lin, Yutong Tang, Yining Cao, Haoqi Han, Tiezheng Zhang, Yujiu Ma, Alan L. Yuille, Zongwei Zhou |
Medical Image Anal. | 4 |