Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

HaiYing Wang 0004

dblp:264/6420 · also Haiying Wang 0004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7729-0243ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Mathematical optimization · 74% Algorithms and data structures · 26%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
optimal subsampling
1.732024
Scale-invariant Optimal Sampling for Rare-events Data and Sparse Models · NeurIPS 2024
Sampling With Replacement vs Poisson Sampling: A Comparative Study in Optimal Subsampling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022
More Efficient Estimation for Logistic Regression with Optimal Subsamples · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
1.732024
Scale-invariant Optimal Sampling for Rare-events Data and Sparse Models · NeurIPS 2024
Maximum sampled conditional likelihood for informative subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
More Efficient Estimation for Logistic Regression with Optimal Subsamples · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
subsampling
1.532022
Sampling With Replacement vs Poisson Sampling: A Comparative Study in Optimal Subsampling · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022
Maximum sampled conditional likelihood for informative subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
More Efficient Estimation for Logistic Regression with Optimal Subsamples · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › generalized linear model
logistic regression
0.822020
Logistic Regression for Massive Data with Rare Events · ICML 2020
More Efficient Estimation for Logistic Regression with Optimal Subsamples · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.612022
Maximum sampled conditional likelihood for informative subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inverse probability weighting · 1.3asymptotic analysis · 1.3under-sampling · 0.9oversampling · 0.9maximum likelihood estimation · 0.9maximum sampled conditional likelihood · 0.8adaptive lasso · 0.8variance minimization · 0.6generalized linear model · 0.6asymptotic distribution · 0.6poisson subsampling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Scale-invariant Optimal Sampling for Rare-events Data and Sparse Models
abstract
Subsampling is effective in tackling computational challenges for massive data with rare events. Overly aggressive subsampling may adversely affect estimation efficiency, and optimal subsampling is essential to mitigate the information loss. However, existing optimal subsampling probabilities depends on data scales, and some scaling transformations may result in inefficient subsamples. This problem is more significant when there are inactive features, because their influence on the subsampling probabilities can be arbitrarily magnified by inappropriate scaling transformations. We tackle this challenge and introduce a scale-invariant optimal subsampling function in the context of sparse models, where inactive features are commonly assumed. Instead of focusing on estimating model parameters, we define an optimal subsampling function to minimize the prediction error, using adaptive lasso as an example to outline the estimation procedure and study its theoretical guarantee. We first introduce the adaptive lasso estimator for rare-events data and establish its oracle properties, thereby validating the use of subsampling. Then we derive a scale-invariant optimal subsampling function that minimizes the prediction error of the inverse probability weighted (IPW) adaptive lasso. Finally, we present an estimator based on the maximum sampled conditional likelihood (MSCL) to further improve the estimation efficiency. We conduct numerical experiments using both simulated and real-world data sets to demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods.
Jing Wang 0210, HaiYing Wang 0004
NeurIPS2
2022 Maximum sampled conditional likelihood for informative subsampling
abstract
Subsampling is a computationally effective approach to extract information from massive data sets when computing resources are limited. After a subsample is taken from the full data, most available methods use an inverse probability weighted (IPW) objective function to estimate the model parameters. The IPW estimator does not fully utilize the information in the selected subsample. In this paper, we propose to use the maximum sampled conditional likelihood estimator (MSCLE) based on the sampled data. We established the asymptotic normality of the MSCLE and prove that its asymptotic variance covariance matrix is the smallest among a class of asymptotically unbiased estimators, including the IPW estimator. We further discuss the asymptotic results with the L-optimal subsampling probabilities and illustrate the estimation procedure with generalized linear models. Numerical experiments are provided to evaluate the practical performance of the proposed method.
HaiYing Wang 0004, Jae Kwang Kim
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2022 Sampling With Replacement vs Poisson Sampling: A Comparative Study in Optimal Subsampling
abstract
Faced with massive data, subsampling is a commonly used technique to improve computational efficiency, and using nonuniform subsampling probabilities is an effective approach to improve estimation efficiency. For computational efficiency, subsampling is often implemented with replacement or through Poisson subsampling. However, no rigorous investigation has been performed to study the difference between the two subsampling procedures such as their estimation efficiency and computational convenience. This paper performs a comparative study on these two different sampling procedures. In the context of maximizing a general target function, we first derive asymptotic distributions for estimators obtained from the two sampling procedures. The results show that the Poisson subsampling may have a higher estimation efficiency. Based on the asymptotic distributions for both subsampling with replacement and Poisson subsampling, we derive optimal subsampling probabilities that minimize the variance functions of the subsampling estimators. These subsampling probabilities further reveal the similarities and differences between subsampling with replacement and Poisson subsampling. The theoretical characterizations and comparisons on the two subsampling procedures provide guidance to select a more appropriate subsampling approach in practice. Furthermore, practically implementable algorithms are proposed based on the optimal structural results, which are evaluated through both theoretical and empirical analyses.
Jing Wang 0210, Jiahui Zou, HaiYing Wang 0004
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3
2021 A comparative study on sampling with replacement vs Poisson sampling in optimal subsampling
abstract
Faced with massive data, subsampling is a commonly used technique to improve computational efficiency, and using nonuniform subsampling probabilities is an effective approach to improve estimation efficiency. For computational efficiency, subsampling is often implemented with replacement or through Poisson subsampling. However, no rigorous investigation has been performed to study the difference between the two subsampling procedures such as their estimation efficiency and computational convenience. In the context of maximizing a general target function, this paper derives optimal subsampling probabilities for both subsampling with replacement and Poisson subsampling. The optimal subsampling probabilities minimize variance functions of the subsampling estimators. Furthermore, they provide deep insights on the theoretical similarities and differences between subsampling with replacement and Poisson subsampling. Practically implementable algorithms are proposed based on the optimal structural results, which are evaluated by both theoretical and empirical analysis.
HaiYing Wang 0004, Jiahui Zou
AISTATS1
2020 Logistic Regression for Massive Data with Rare Events
abstract
This paper studies binary logistic regression for rare events data, or imbalanced data, where the number of events (observations in one class, often called cases) is significantly smaller than the number of nonevents (observations in the other class, often called controls). We first derive the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the unknown parameter, which shows that the asymptotic variance convergences to zero in a rate of the inverse of the number of the events instead of the inverse of the full data sample size, indicating that the available information in rare events data is at the scale of the number of events instead of the full data sample size. Furthermore, we prove that under-sampling a small proportion of the nonevents, the resulting under-sampled estimator may have identical asymptotic distribution to the full data MLE. This demonstrates the advantage of under-sampling nonevents for rare events data, because this procedure may significantly reduce the computation and/or data collection costs. Another common practice in analyzing rare events data is to over-sample (replicate) the events, which has a higher computational cost. We show that this procedure may even result in efficiency loss in terms of parameter estimation.
HaiYing Wang 0004
ICML1
2019 More Efficient Estimation for Logistic Regression with Optimal Subsamples
abstract
In this paper, we propose improved estimation method for logistic regression based on subsamples taken according the optimal subsampling probabilities developed in Wang et al. (2018). Both asymptotic results and numerical results show that the new estimator has a higher estimation efficiency. We also develop a new algorithm based on Poisson subsampling, which does not require to approximate the optimal subsampling probabilities all at once. This is computationally advantageous when available random-access memory is not enough to hold the full data. Interestingly, asymptotic distributions also show that Poisson subsampling produces a more efficient estimator if the sampling ratio, the ratio of the subsample size to the full data sample size, does not converge to zero. We also obtain the unconditional asymptotic distribution for the estimator based on Poisson subsampling. Pilot estimators are required to calculate subsampling probabilities and to correct biases in un-weighted estimators; interestingly, even if pilot estimators are inconsistent, the proposed method still produce consistent and asymptotically normal estimators.
HaiYing Wang 0004
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1