EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Connors
dblp:264/7417
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0964-020XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 77% Accessibility and assistive technology · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
multi-class segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT Scans · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT Scans · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
medical image segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT Scans · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Design research and methods
participatory design |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | "We have been magnified for years - Now you are under the microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning Disabilities · CHI 2020 |
Medical and health informatics › medical education
surgical training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT Scans · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
patch-wise densely connected network · 1.0fully convolutional network · 1.0data augmentation · 1.0online survey · 0.4co-design · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | PWD-3DNet: A Deep Learning-Based Fully-Automated Segmentation of Multiple Structures on Temporal Bone CT ScansabstractThe temporal bone is a part of the lateral skull surface that contains organs responsible for hearing and balance. Mastering surgery of the temporal bone is challenging because of this complex and microscopic three-dimensional anatomy. Segmentation of intra-temporal anatomy based on computed tomography (CT) images is necessary for applications such as surgical training and rehearsal, amongst others. However, temporal bone segmentation is challenging due to the similar intensities and complicated anatomical relationships among critical structures, undetectable small structures on standard clinical CT, and the amount of time required for manual segmentation. This paper describes a single multi-class deep learning-based pipeline as the first fully automated algorithm for segmenting multiple temporal bone structures from CT volumes, including the sigmoid sinus, facial nerve, inner ear, malleus, incus, stapes, internal carotid artery and internal auditory canal. The proposed fully convolutional network, PWD-3DNet, is a patch-wise densely connected (PWD) three-dimensional (3D) network. The accuracy and speed of the proposed algorithm was shown to surpass current manual and semi-automated segmentation techniques. The experimental results yielded significantly high Dice similarity scores and low Hausdorff distances for all temporal bone structures with an average of 86% and 0.755 millimeter (mm), respectively. We illustrated that overlapping in the inference sub-volumes improves the segmentation performance. Moreover, we proposed augmentation layers by using samples with various transformations and image artefacts to increase the robustness of PWD-3DNet against image acquisition protocols, such as smoothing caused by soft tissue scanner settings and larger voxel sizes used for radiation reduction. The proposed algorithm was tested on low-resolution CTs acquired by another center with different scanner parameters than the ones used to create the algorithm and shows potential for application beyond the particular training data used in the study. Soodeh Nikan, Kylen Van Osch, Mandolin Bartling, Daniel G. Allen, S. Alireza Rohani, Ben Connors, Sumit K. Agrawal, Hanif M. Ladak |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 6 |
| 2020 | "We have been magnified for years - Now you are under the microscope!": Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities Created an Online Survey to Challenge Public Understanding of Learning DisabilitiesabstractPublic attitudes towards learning disabilities (LDs) are generally reported as positive, inclusive and empathetic. However, these findings do not reflect the lived experiences of people with LDs. To shed light on this disparity, a team of co-researchers with LDs created the first online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs, asking questions in ways that are important to them and represent how they see themselves. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of creating an accessible survey platform and an online survey in a research team consisting of academic and non-academic professionals with and without LDs or autism. Through this inclusive research process, the co-designed survey met the expectations of the co-researchers and was well-received by the initial survey respondents. We reflect on the co-researchers' perspectives following the study completion, and consider the difficulties and advantages we encountered deploying such approaches and their potential implications on future survey data analysis. Dorota Chapko, Pino Frumiento, Nalini Edwards, Lizzie Emeh, Donald Kennedy, David McNicholas, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny M. Sutton, Evie Jeffreys, Catherine Long, Jess Croll-Knight, Ben Connors, Sam Castell-Ward, David Coke, Bethany McPeake, William Renel, Chris McGinley, Anna Remington, Dora Whittuck, John Kieffer, Sarah Ewans, Mark Williams 0005, Mick Grierson |
CHI | 14 |