Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marina Fernández Camporro

dblp:264/7546 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Interaction techniques and input · 57% User interface design and tools · 35% Design research and methods · 8%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input › pen input
digital ink
0.512021
Sketchnote Components, Design Space Dimensions, and Strategies for Effective Visual Note Taking · CHI 2021
Interaction techniques and input › input modality › multimodal input
pen and touch input
0.412020
Live Sketchnoting Across Platforms: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Analogue and Digital Tools · CHI 2020
Design research and methods › research methodology
observational study
0.112020
Live Sketchnoting Across Platforms: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Analogue and Digital Tools · CHI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-structured interviews · 0.9qualitative analysis · 0.5within-subjects study · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Sketchnote Components, Design Space Dimensions, and Strategies for Effective Visual Note Taking
abstract
Sketchnoting is a form of visual note taking where people listen to, synthesize, and visualize ideas from a talk or other event using a combination of pictures, diagrams, and text. Little is known about the design space of this kind of visual note taking. With an eye towards informing the implementation of digital equivalents of sketchnoting, inking, and note taking, we introduce a classification of sketchnote styles and techniques, with a qualitative analysis of 103 sketchnotes, and situated in context with six semi-structured follow up interviews. Our findings distill core sketchnote components (content, layout, structuring elements, and visual styling) and dimensions of the sketchnote design space, classifying levels of conciseness, illustration, structure, personification, cohesion, and craftsmanship. We unpack strategies to address particular note taking challenges, for example dealing with constraints of live drawings, and discuss relevance for future digital inking tools, such as recomposition, styling, and design suggestions.
Rebecca Zheng, Marina Fernández Camporro, Hugo Romat, Nathalie Henry Riche, Benjamin Bach, Fanny Chevalier, Ken Hinckley, Nicolai Marquardt
CHI2
2020 Live Sketchnoting Across Platforms: Exploring the Potential and Limitations of Analogue and Digital Tools
abstract
Sketchnoting is the process of creating a visual record with combined text and imagery of an event or presentation. Although analogue tools are still the most common method for sketchnoting, the use of digital tools is increasing. We conducted a study to better understand the current practices, techniques, compromises and opportunities of creating both pen&paper and digital sketchnotes. Our research combines insights from semi-structured interviews with the findings from a within-subjects observational study where ten participants created real time sketchnotes of two video presentations on both paper and digital tablet. We report our key findings, categorised into six themes: insights into sense of space; trade-offs with flexibility; choice paradox and cognitive load; matters of perception, accuracy and texture; issues around confidence; and practicalities. We discuss those findings, the potential and limitations of different methods, and implications for the design of future digital sketchnoting tools.
Marina Fernández Camporro, Nicolai Marquardt
CHI1