Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephanie Kim

dblp:264/7952 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-7814-1158ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
robot autonomy
0.812024
A Taxonomy of Robot Autonomy for Human-Robot Interaction · HRI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic literature review · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Taxonomy of Robot Autonomy for Human-Robot Interaction
abstract
Robot autonomy is an influential and ubiquitous factor in human-robot interaction (HRI), but it is rarely discussed beyond a one-dimensional measure of the degree to which a robot operates without human intervention. As robots become more sophisticated, this simple view of autonomy could be expanded to capture the variety of autonomous behaviors robots can exhibit and to match the rich literature on human autonomy in philosophy, psychology, and other fields. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review of robot autonomy in HRI and integrate this with the broader literature into a taxonomy of six distinct forms of autonomy: those based on robot and human involvement at runtime (operational autonomy, intentional autonomy, shared autonomy), human involvement before runtime (non-deterministic autonomy), and expressions of autonomy at runtime (cognitive autonomy, physical autonomy). We discuss future considerations for autonomy in HRI that emerge from this study, including moral consequences, the idealization of "full" robot autonomy, and connections to agency and free will.
Stephanie Kim, Jacy Reese Anthis, Sarah Sebo
HRI1