EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oliver Siy
dblp:264/8005 · also John Oliver Siy
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0090-474XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 56% Usability and user experience research · 44% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
responsible AI |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | "Because AI is 100% right and safe": User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in India · CHI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.6interviews · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | In Whose Voice?: Examining AI Agent Representation of People in Social Interaction through Generative SpeechabstractAs generative artificial intelligence (genAI) applications gain popularity, there is a dearth of research examining how applications may transform social interactions. One possible application set to transform social interactions is the use of generative speech to power AI agents that can realistically represent people. Our work examines the potential implications of AI agents representing individuals in human conversations ("agent representation") as a way to begin filling this research gap. We take a multi-method approach, conducting formative interviews with developers, a co-design workshop with designers, a harm analysis among researchers, and interviews with the general public. Both technologists and potential users worry adopting agent representations might harm the quality, trust, and autonomy of human communication. Potential users are particularly concerned that agent representations could undermine the value of social interaction and threaten individuals’ ability to control their image. To avoid such potential consequences, future genAI-powered agents and speech applications should take into account user-defined red lines when considering applying these technologies in social settings. Angel Hwang, Oliver Siy, Renee Shelby, Alison Lentz |
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems | 2 |
| 2022 | "Because AI is 100% right and safe": User Attitudes and Sources of AI Authority in IndiaabstractMost prior work on human-AI interaction is set in communities that indicate skepticism towards AI, but we know less about contexts where AI is viewed as aspirational. We investigated the perceptions around AI systems by drawing upon 32 interviews and 459 survey respondents in India. Not only do Indian users accept AI decisions (79.2% respondents indicate acceptance), we find a case of AI authority—AI has a legitimized power to influence human actions, without requiring adequate evidence about the capabilities of the system. AI authority manifested into four user attitudes of vulnerability: faith, forgiveness, self-blame, and gratitude, pointing to higher tolerance for system misfires, and introducing potential for irreversible individual and societal harm. We urgently call for calibrating AI authority, reconsidering success metrics and responsible AI approaches and present methodological suggestions for research and deployments in India. Shivani Kapania, Oliver Siy, Gabe Clapper, Nithya Sambasivan |
CHI | 2 |