Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Naoto Mitsume
dblp:264/9409
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 72% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance · ICML 2024 Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
conservation laws |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network architecture
physics-informed graph neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Isometric Transformation Invariant and Equivariant Graph Convolutional Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Geometric modeling and processing › geometric deep learning
equivariant neural networks |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Isometric Transformation Invariant and Equivariant Graph Convolutional Networks · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary Conditions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity-equivariance · 1.5graph neural network · 1.5conservation laws · 1.5implicit method · 1.1E(n)-equivariant GNN · 1.1graph convolutional network · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-EquivarianceabstractUtilizing machine learning to address partial differential equations (PDEs) presents significant challenges due to the diversity of spatial domains and their corresponding state configurations, which complicates the task of encompassing all potential scenarios through data-driven methodologies alone. Moreover, there are legitimate concerns regarding the generalization and reliability of such approaches, as they often overlook inherent physical constraints. In response to these challenges, this study introduces a novel machine-learning architecture that is highly generalizable and adheres to conservation laws and physical symmetries, thereby ensuring greater reliability. The foundation of this architecture is graph neural networks (GNNs), which are adept at accommodating a variety of shapes and forms. Additionally, we explore the parallels between GNNs and traditional numerical solvers, facilitating a seamless integration of conservative principles and symmetries into machine learning models. Our findings from experiments demonstrate that the model’s inclusion of physical laws significantly enhances its generalizability, i.e., no significant accuracy degradation for unseen spatial domains while other models degrade. The code is available at https://github.com/yellowshippo/fluxgnn-icml2024. Masanobu Horie, Naoto Mitsume |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Physics-Embedded Neural Networks: Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Mixed Boundary ConditionsabstractGraph neural network (GNN) is a promising approach to learning and predicting physical phenomena described in boundary value problems, such as partial differential equations (PDEs) with boundary conditions. However, existing models inadequately treat boundary conditions essential for the reliable prediction of such problems. In addition, because of the locally connected nature of GNNs, it is difficult to accurately predict the state after a long time, where interaction between vertices tends to be global. We present our approach termed physics-embedded neural networks that considers boundary conditions and predicts the state after a long time using an implicit method. It is built based on an $\mathrm{E}(n)$-equivariant GNN, resulting in high generalization performance on various shapes. We demonstrate that our model learns flow phenomena in complex shapes and outperforms a well-optimized classical solver and a state-of-the-art machine learning model in speed-accuracy trade-off. Therefore, our model can be a useful standard for realizing reliable, fast, and accurate GNN-based PDE solvers. The code is available at https://github.com/yellowshippo/penn-neurips2022. Masanobu Horie, Naoto Mitsume |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Isometric Transformation Invariant and Equivariant Graph Convolutional Networks
Masanobu Horie, Naoki Morita, Toshiaki Hishinuma, Yu Ihara, Naoto Mitsume |
ICLR | 5 |