Implicit neural representation (INR) methods for video compression have recently achieved visual quality and compression ratios that are competitive with traditional pipelines. However, due to the need for per-sample network training, the encoding speeds of these methods are too slow for practical adoption. We develop a library to allow us to disentangle and review the components of methods from the NeRV family, reframing their performance in terms of not only size-quality trade-offs, but also impacts on training time. We uncover principles for effective video INR design and propose a state-of-the-art configuration of these components, Rabbit NeRV (RNeRV). When all methods are given equal training time (equivalent to 300 NeRV epochs) for 7 different UVG videos at 1080p, RNeRV achieves +1.27% PSNR on average compared to the best-performing alternative for each video in our NeRV library. We then tackle the encoding speed issue head-on by investigating the viability of hyper-networks, which predict INR weights from video inputs, to disentangle training from encoding to allow for real-time encoding. We propose masking the weights of the predicted INR during training to allow for variable, higher quality compression, resulting in 1.7% improvements to both PSNR and MS-SSIM at 0.037 bpp on the UCF-101 dataset, and we increase hyper-network parameters by 0.4% for 2.5%/2.7% improvements to PSNR/MS-SSIM with equal bpp and similar speeds. Our code is available at https://github.com/mgwillia/vinrb.

Existing long video retrieval systems are trained and tested in the paragraph-to- video retrieval regime, where ev-ery long video is described by a single long paragraph. This neglects the richness and variety of possible valid de-scriptions of a video, which could range anywhere from moment-by-moment detail to a single phrase summary. To provide a more thorough evaluation of the capabilities of long video retrieval systems, we propose a pipeline that leverages state-of-the-art large language models to care-fully generate a diverse set of synthetic captions for long videos. We validate this pipeline's fidelity via rigorous hu-man inspection. We use synthetic captionsfrom this pipeline to perform a benchmark of a representative set of video language models using long video datasets, and show that the models struggle on shorter captions. We show that finetuning on this data can both mitigate these issues (+2.8% R@ 1 over SOTA on ActivityNet with diverse captions), and even improve performance on standard paragraph-to-video re-trieval (+ 1.0% R@1 on ActivityNet). We also use synthetic data from our pipeline as query expansion in the zero-shot setting (+3.4% R@ 1 on ActivityNet). We derive insights by analyzing failure cases for retrieval with short captions.

The many variations of Implicit Neural Representations (INRs), where a neural network is trained as a continuous representation of a signal, have tremendous practical utility for downstream tasks including novel view synthesis, video compression, and image super-resolution. Unfortunately, the inner workings of these networks are seriously under-studied. Our work, eXplaining the Implicit Neural Canvas (XINC), is a unified framework for explaining properties of INRs by examining the strength of each neuron's contribution to each output pixel. We call the aggregate of these contribution maps the Implicit Neural Canvas and we use this concept to demonstrate that the INRs we study learn to “see” the frames they represent in surprising ways. For ex-ample, INRs tend to have highly distributed representations. While lacking high-level object semantics, they have a sig-nificant bias for color and edges, and are almost entirely space-agnostic. We arrive at our conclusions by examining how objects are represented across time in video INRs, using clustering to visualize similar neurons across layers and architectures, and show that this is dominated by motion. These insights demonstrate the general usefulness of our analysis framework.

While the community has seen many advances in recent years to address the challenging problem of Fine-grained Visual Categorization (FGVC), progress seems to be slowing—new state-of-the-art methods often distinguish themselves by improving top-1 accuracy by mere tenths of a percent. However, across all of the now-standard FGVC datasets, there remain sizeable portions of the test data that none of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) models can successfully predict. This paper provides a framework for identifying and studying the errors that current methods make across diverse fine-grained datasets. Three models of difficulty—Prediction Overlap, Prediction Rank and Pair-wise Class Confusion—are employed to highlight the most challenging sets of images and classes. Extensive experiments apply a range of standard and SOTA methods, evaluating them on multiple FGVC domains and datasets. Insights acquired from coupling these difficulty paradigms with the careful analysis of experimental results suggest crucial areas for future FGVC research, focusing critically on the set of elusive images that none of the current models can correctly classify. Code is available at catalys1.github.io/elusive-images-fgvc.

Implicit neural representations store videos as neural networks and have performed well for various vision tasks such as video compression and denoising. With frame index or positional index as input, implicit representations (NeRV, E-NeRV, etc.) reconstruct video frames from fixed and content-agnostic embeddings. Such embedding largely limits the regression capacity and internal generalization for video interpolation. In this paper, we propose a Hybrid Neural Representation for Videos (HNeRV), where a learnable encoder generates content-adaptive embeddings, which act as the decoder input. Besides the input embedding, we introduce HNeRV blocks, which ensure model parameters are evenly distributed across the entire network, such that higher layers (layers near the output) can have more capacity to store high-resolution content and video details. With content-adaptive embeddings and redesigned architecture, HNeRV outperforms implicit methods in video regression tasks for both reconstruction quality (+4.7 PSNR) and convergence speed (16 × faster), and shows better internal generalization. As a simple and efficient video representation, HNeRV also shows decoding advantages for speed, flexibility, and deployment, compared to traditional codecs (H.264, H.265) and learning-based compression methods. Finally, we explore the effectiveness of HNeRV on downstream tasks such as video compression and video inpainting.

By leveraging contrastive learning, clustering, and other pretext tasks, unsupervised methods for learning image representations have reached impressive results on standard benchmarks. The result has been a crowded field - many methods with substantially different implementations yield results that seem nearly identical on popular benchmarks, such as linear evaluation on ImageNet. However, a single result does not tell the whole story. In this paper, we compare methods using performance-based benchmarks such as linear evaluation, nearest neighbor classification, and clustering for several different datasets, demonstrating the lack of a clear front-runner within the current state-of-the-art. In contrast to prior work that performs only supervised vs. unsupervised comparison, we compare several different unsupervised methods against each other. To enrich this comparison, we analyze embeddings with measurements such as uniformity, tolerance, and centered kernel alignment (CKA), and propose two new metrics of our own: nearest neighbor graph similarity and linear prediction overlap. We reveal through our analysis that in isolation, single popular methods should not be treated as though they represent the field as a whole, and that future work ought to consider how to leverage the complimentary nature of these methods. We also leverage CKA to provide a framework to robustly quantify augmentation invariance, and provide a reminder that certain types of invariance will be undesirable for downstream tasks.

Recent studies in the field of Machine Translation (MT) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have shown that existing models amplify biases observed in the training data.The amplification of biases in language technology has mainly been examined with respect to specific phenomena, such as gender bias.In this work, we go beyond the study of gender in MT and investigate how bias amplification might affect language in a broader sense.We hypothesize that the 'algorithmic bias', i.e. an exacerbation of frequently observed patterns in combination with a loss of less frequent ones, not only exacerbates societal biases present in current datasets but could also lead to an artificially impoverished language: 'machine translationese'.We assess the linguistic richness (on a lexical and morphological level) of translations created by different data-driven MT paradigms -phrase-based statistical (PB-SMT) and neural MT (NMT).Our experiments show that there is a loss of lexical and morphological richness in the translations produced by all investigated MT paradigms for two language pairs (EN↔FR and EN↔ES).

For the task of image classification, researchers work arduously to develop the next state-of-the-art (SOTA) model, each bench-marking their own performance against that of their predecessors and of their peers. Unfortunately, the metric used most frequently to describe a model's performance, average categorization accuracy, is often used in isolation. As the number of classes increases, such as in fine-grained visual categorization (FGVC), the amount of information conveyed by average accuracy alone dwindles. While its most glaring weakness is its failure to describe the model's performance on a class-by-class basis, average accuracy also fails to describe how performance may vary from one trained model of the same architecture, on the same dataset, to another (both averaged across all categories and at the per-class level). We first demonstrate the magnitude of these variations across models and across class distributions based on attributes of the data, comparing results on different visual domains and different per-class image distributions, including long-tailed distributions and few-shot subsets. We then analyze the impact various FGVC methods have on overall and per-class variance. From this analysis, we both highlight the importance of reporting and comparing methods based on information beyond overall accuracy, as well as point out techniques that mitigate variance in FGVC results.

Key recognition tasks such as fine-grained visual categorization (FGVC) have benefited from increasing attention among computer vision researchers. The development and evaluation of new approaches relies heavily on benchmark datasets; such datasets are generally built primarily with categories that have images readily available, omitting categories with insufficient data. This paper takes a step back and rethinks dataset construction, focusing on intelligent image collection driven by: (i) the inclusion of all desired categories, and, (ii) the recognition performance on those categories. Based on a small, author-provided initial dataset, the proposed system recommends which categories the authors should prioritize collecting additional images for, with the intent of optimizing overall categorization accuracy. We show that mock datasets built using this method outperform datasets built without such a guiding framework. Additional experiments give prospective dataset creators intuition into how, based on their circumstances and goals, a dataset should be constructed.