Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marek Justyna

dblp:265/2629 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8564-4435ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA 3D structure prediction
0.912025
Graph neural network and diffusion model for modeling RNA interatomic interactions · Bioinform. 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure prediction
0.912025
Graph neural network and diffusion model for modeling RNA interatomic interactions · Bioinform. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph neural network · 0.9denoising diffusion probabilistic model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Graph neural network and diffusion model for modeling RNA interatomic interactions
abstract
MOTIVATION: Ribonucleic acid (RNA) function is inherently linked to its 3D structure, traditionally determined by X-ray crystallography, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, and Cryo-EM. However, these techniques often lack atomic-level resolution, highlighting the need for accurate in silico RNA structure prediction tools. Current state-of-the-art methods, such as AlphaFold3, Boltz1, RhoFold, or trRosettaRNA, rely on deep learning models that represent residues as frames and use transformers to learn relative positions. While effective for known RNA families, their performance drops for synthetic or novel families. RESULTS: In this work, we explore the potential of graph neural networks and denoising diffusion probabilistic models for learning interatomic interactions. We model RNA as a graph in a coarse-grained, five-atom representation and evaluate our approach on a dataset of small RNA substructures, known as local RNA descriptors, which recur even in non-homologous structures. Generalization is assessed using a dataset partitioned by RNA family: the training set consists of rRNA and tRNA structures, while the test set includes descriptors from all other families. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method reliably predicts the structures of unseen descriptors and effectively adheres to user-defined constraints, such as Watson-Crick-Franklin interactions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The GraphaRNA source code is available on GitHub (github.com/mjustynaPhD/GraphaRNA); training/test datasets and pre-trained model weights are provided on Zenodo (zenodo.org/records/13750967).
Marek Justyna, Craig L. Zirbel, Maciej Antczak, Marta Szachniuk
Bioinform.1
2023 Machine learning for RNA 2D structure prediction benchmarked on experimental data
abstract
Since the 1980s, dozens of computational methods have addressed the problem of predicting RNA secondary structure. Among them are those that follow standard optimization approaches and, more recently, machine learning (ML) algorithms. The former were repeatedly benchmarked on various datasets. The latter, on the other hand, have not yet undergone extensive analysis that could suggest to the user which algorithm best fits the problem to be solved. In this review, we compare 15 methods that predict the secondary structure of RNA, of which 6 are based on deep learning (DL), 3 on shallow learning (SL) and 6 control methods on non-ML approaches. We discuss the ML strategies implemented and perform three experiments in which we evaluate the prediction of (I) representatives of the RNA equivalence classes, (II) selected Rfam sequences and (III) RNAs from new Rfam families. We show that DL-based algorithms (such as SPOT-RNA and UFold) can outperform SL and traditional methods if the data distribution is similar in the training and testing set. However, when predicting 2D structures for new RNA families, the advantage of DL is no longer clear, and its performance is inferior or equal to that of SL and non-ML methods.
Marek Justyna, Maciej Antczak, Marta Szachniuk
Briefings Bioinform.1
2020 M3AT: Monitoring Agents Assignment Model for Data-Intensive Applications
abstract
Nowadays, massive amounts of data are acquired, transferred, and analyzed nearly in real-time by utilizing a large number of computing and storage elements interconnected through high-speed communication networks. However, one issue that still requires research effort is to enable efficient monitoring of applications and infrastructures of such complex systems. In this paper, we introduce an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) model called M3AT for optimized assignment of monitoring agents and aggregators on large-scale computing systems. We identified a set of requirements from three representative data-intensive applications and exploited them to define the model's input parameters. We evaluated the scalability of M3AT using the Constraint Integer Programing (SCIP) solver with default configuration based on synthetic data sets. Preliminary results show that the model provides optimal assignments for subsystems composed of up to 200 monitoring agents with complex I/O policies, while keeping the number of aggregators constant and demonstrates variable sensitivity with respect to the scale of monitoring data aggregators and limitation policies imposed.
Vladislav Kashansky, Dragi Kimovski, Radu Prodan, Prateek Agrawal, Fabrizio Marozzo, Gabriel Iuhasz, Marek Justyna, Francisco Javier García Blas
PDP7