Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tiffany Ding
dblp:265/4845
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
class-conditional coverage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
conformal scores · 0.7clustered conformal prediction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many ClassesabstractStandard conformal prediction methods provide a marginal coverage guarantee,
which means that for a random test point, the conformal prediction set contains
the true label with a user-specified probability. In many classification
problems, we would like to obtain a stronger guarantee--that for test points
of a specific class, the prediction set contains the true label with the
same user-chosen probability. For the latter goal, existing conformal prediction
methods do not work well when there is a limited amount of labeled data per
class, as is often the case in real applications where the number of classes is
large. We propose a method called clustered conformal prediction that
clusters together classes having "similar" conformal scores and performs
conformal prediction at the cluster level. Based on empirical evaluation across
four image data sets with many (up to 1000) classes, we find that clustered
conformal typically outperforms existing methods in terms of class-conditional
coverage and set size metrics. Tiffany Ding, Anastasios Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Michael I. Jordan, Ryan J. Tibshirani |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial LabelersabstractProgrammatic weak supervision creates models without hand-labeled training data by combining the outputs of heuristic labelers. Existing frameworks make the restrictive assumption that labelers output a single class label. Enabling users to create partial labelers that output subsets of possible class labels would greatly expand the expressivity of programmatic weak supervision. We introduce this capability by defining a probabilistic generative model that can estimate the underlying accuracies of multiple noisy partial labelers without ground truth labels. We show how to scale up learning, for example learning on 100k examples in one minute, a 300$\times$ speed up compared to a naive implementation. We also prove that this class of models is generically identifiable up to label swapping under mild conditions. We evaluate our framework on three text classification and six object classification tasks. On text tasks, adding partial labels increases average accuracy by 8.6 percentage points. On image tasks, we show that partial labels allow us to approach some zero-shot object classification problems with programmatic weak supervision by using class attributes as partial labelers. On these tasks, our framework has accuracy comparable to recent embedding-based zero-shot learning methods, while using only pre-trained attribute detectors. Tiffany Ding, Stephen H. Bach |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2019 | Mining Drugs and Indications for Suicide-Related Adverse Events
Tiffany Ding, Elizabeth S. Chen |
AMIA | 1 |