Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tiffany Ding

dblp:265/4845 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
class-conditional coverage
0.712023
Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.712023
Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conformal scores · 0.7clustered conformal prediction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Class-Conditional Conformal Prediction with Many Classes
abstract
Standard conformal prediction methods provide a marginal coverage guarantee, which means that for a random test point, the conformal prediction set contains the true label with a user-specified probability. In many classification problems, we would like to obtain a stronger guarantee--that for test points of a specific class, the prediction set contains the true label with the same user-chosen probability. For the latter goal, existing conformal prediction methods do not work well when there is a limited amount of labeled data per class, as is often the case in real applications where the number of classes is large. We propose a method called clustered conformal prediction that clusters together classes having "similar" conformal scores and performs conformal prediction at the cluster level. Based on empirical evaluation across four image data sets with many (up to 1000) classes, we find that clustered conformal typically outperforms existing methods in terms of class-conditional coverage and set size metrics.
Tiffany Ding, Anastasios Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Michael I. Jordan, Ryan J. Tibshirani
NeurIPS1
2022 Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelers
abstract
Programmatic weak supervision creates models without hand-labeled training data by combining the outputs of heuristic labelers. Existing frameworks make the restrictive assumption that labelers output a single class label. Enabling users to create partial labelers that output subsets of possible class labels would greatly expand the expressivity of programmatic weak supervision. We introduce this capability by defining a probabilistic generative model that can estimate the underlying accuracies of multiple noisy partial labelers without ground truth labels. We show how to scale up learning, for example learning on 100k examples in one minute, a 300$\times$ speed up compared to a naive implementation. We also prove that this class of models is generically identifiable up to label swapping under mild conditions. We evaluate our framework on three text classification and six object classification tasks. On text tasks, adding partial labels increases average accuracy by 8.6 percentage points. On image tasks, we show that partial labels allow us to approach some zero-shot object classification problems with programmatic weak supervision by using class attributes as partial labelers. On these tasks, our framework has accuracy comparable to recent embedding-based zero-shot learning methods, while using only pre-trained attribute detectors.
Tiffany Ding, Stephen H. Bach
AISTATS2
2019 Mining Drugs and Indications for Suicide-Related Adverse Events
Tiffany Ding, Elizabeth S. Chen
AMIA1