Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Mariana Bernagozzi

dblp:265/6273 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2970-2535ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Information extraction and text analysis · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 77% Information retrieval · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
competitive analysis
0.922020
Clarity: Data-Driven Automatic Assessment of Product Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Data-Driven Ranking and Visualization of Products by Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias evaluation
0.512021
VEGA: a Virtual Environment for Exploring Gender Bias vs. Accuracy Trade-offs in AI Translation Services · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
biomedical relation extraction
0.512021
Exploring the Efficacy of Generic Drugs in Treating Cancer · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.512021
VEGA: a Virtual Environment for Exploring Gender Bias vs. Accuracy Trade-offs in AI Translation Services · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
gender bias
0.512021
VEGA: a Virtual Environment for Exploring Gender Bias vs. Accuracy Trade-offs in AI Translation Services · AAAI 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug repurposing
0.512021
Exploring the Efficacy of Generic Drugs in Treating Cancer · AAAI 2021
Visualization and visual analytics › interactive visualization
interactive dashboard
0.412020
Clarity: Data-Driven Automatic Assessment of Product Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Visualization and visual analytics
interactive visualization
0.412020
Data-Driven Ranking and Visualization of Products by Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.112020
Clarity: Data-Driven Automatic Assessment of Product Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval › entity ranking
product ranking
0.112020
Data-Driven Ranking and Visualization of Products by Competitiveness · AAAI 2020
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112020
Data-Driven Ranking and Visualization of Products by Competitiveness · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised learning · 1.3sentiment analysis · 1.3content volume analysis · 1.3visualization · 1.0natural language processing · 1.0machine learning · 1.0continuous integration · 1.0data-driven ranking · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Exploring the Efficacy of Generic Drugs in Treating Cancer
abstract
Thousands of scientific publications discuss evidence on the efficacy of non-cancer generic drugs being tested for cancer. However, trying to manually identify and extract such evidence is intractable at scale. We introduce a natural language processing pipeline to automate the identification of relevant studies and facilitate the extraction of therapeutic associations between generic drugs and cancers from PubMed abstracts. We annotate datasets of drug-cancer evidence and use them to train models to identify and characterize such evidence at scale. To make this evidence readily consumable, we incorporate the results of the models in a web application that allows users to browse documents and their extracted evidence. Users can provide feedback on the quality of the evidence extracted by our models. This feedback is used to improve our datasets and the corresponding models in a continuous integration system. We describe the natural language processing pipeline in our application and the steps required to deploy services based on the machine learning models.
Ioana Baldini, Mariana Bernagozzi, Sulbha Aggarwal, Mihaela A. Bornea, Saksham Chawla, Joppe Geluykens, Dmitriy Katz, Pratik Mukherjee, Smruthi Ramesh, Sara Rosenthal, Jagrati Sharma, Kush R. Varshney, Laura B. Kleiman, Pradeep Mangalath, Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz
AAAI2
2021 VEGA: a Virtual Environment for Exploring Gender Bias vs. Accuracy Trade-offs in AI Translation Services
abstract
Machine translation services are a very popular class of Artificial Intelligence (AI) services nowadays but public's trust in these services is not guaranteed since they have been shown to have issues like bias. In this work, we focus on the behavior of machine translators with respect to gender bias as well as their accuracy. We have created the first-of-its-kind virtual environment, called VEGA, where the user can interactively explore translation services and compare their trust ratings using different visuals.
Mariana Bernagozzi, Biplav Srivastava, Francesca Rossi 0001, Sheema Usmani
AAAI1
2020 Data-Driven Ranking and Visualization of Products by Competitiveness
Sheema Usmani, Mariana Bernagozzi, Michelle Morales, Amir Sabet Sarvestani, Biplav Srivastava
AAAI2
2020 Clarity: Data-Driven Automatic Assessment of Product Competitiveness
abstract
Competitive analysis is a critical part of any business. Product managers, sellers, and marketers spend time and resources scouring through an immense amount of online and offline content, aiming to discover what their competitors are doing in the marketplace to understand what type of threat they pose to their business' financial well-being. Currently, this process is time and labor-intensive, slow and costly. This paper presents Clarity, a data-driven unsupervised system for assessment of products, which is currently in deployment in the large IT company, IBM. Clarity has been running for more than a year and is used by over 1,500 people to perform over 160 competitive analyses involving over 800 products. The system considers multiple factors from a collection of online content: numeric ratings by online users, sentiments of reviews for key product performance dimensions, content volume, and recency of content. The results and explanations of factors leading to the results are visualized in an interactive dashboard that allows users to track their product's performance as well as understand main contributing factors. Its efficacy has been tested in a series of cases across IBM's portfolio which spans software, hardware, and services.
Sheema Usmani, Mariana Bernagozzi, Michelle Morales, Amir Sabet Sarvestani, Biplav Srivastava
AAAI2