EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anirudh Bindiganavale Harish
dblp:266/2848
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1079-8656ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 32% Face, body and person analysis · 28% Vision and language · 16% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 33% Wearable and physiological sensing · 33% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 33% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face analysis
remote photoplethysmography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Implicit Neural Models to Extract Heart Rate from Video · ECCV (83) 2024 |
Wearable and physiological sensing › vital sign monitoring
heart rate monitoring |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Blending camera and 77 GHz radar sensing for equitable, robust plethysmography · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Haptics and multimodal interaction
multimodal fusion |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Blending camera and 77 GHz radar sensing for equitable, robust plethysmography · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feature fusion
attention-based feature fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trimodal Attention Module for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trimodal Attention Module for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis
multimodal sentiment analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trimodal Attention Module for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Trimodal Attention Module for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020 |
Wireless sensing and localization
radar sensing |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Blending camera and 77 GHz radar sensing for equitable, robust plethysmography · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
light transport analysis · 1.1debiasing · 1.1implicit neural representation · 0.8multimodal fusion · 0.6multi-modal fusion · 0.6attention mechanism · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CogPhys: Assessing Cognitive Load via Multimodal Remote and Contact-based Physiological SensingabstractRemote physiological sensing is an evolving area of research. As systems approach clinical precision, there is increasing focus on complex applications such as cognitive state estimation. Hence, there is a need for large datasets that facilitate research into complex downstream tasks such as remote cognitive load estimation. A first-of-its-kind, our paper introduces an open-source multimodal multi-vital sign dataset consisting of concurrent recordings from RGB, NIR (near-infrared), thermal, and RF (radio-frequency) sensors alongside contact-based physiological signals, such as pulse oximeter and chest bands, providing a benchmark for cognitive state assessment. By adopting a multimodal approach to remote health sensing, our dataset and its associated hardware system excel at modeling the complexities of cognitive load. Here, cognitive load is defined as the mental effort exerted during tasks such as reading, memorizing, and solving math problems. By using the NASA-TLX survey, we set personalized thresholds for defining high/low cognitive levels, enabling a more reliable benchmark. Our benchmarking scheme bridges the gap between existing remote sensing strategies and cognitive load estimation techniques by using vital signs (such as photoplethysmography (PPG) and respiratory waveforms) and physiological signals (blink waveforms) as an intermediary. Through this paper, we focus on replacing the need for intrusive contact-based physiological measurements with more user-friendly remote sensors. Our benchmarking demonstrates that multimodal fusion significantly improves remote vital sign estimation, with our fusion model achieving $<3~BPM$ (beats per minute) error for vital sign estimation. For cognitive load classification, the combination of remote PPG, remote respiratory signals, and blink markers achieves $86.49$% accuracy, approaching the performance of contact-based sensing ($87.5$%) and validating the feasibility of non-intrusive cognitive monitoring. Anirudh Bindiganavale Harish, Peikun Guo, Bhargav Ghanekar, Diya Gupta, Akilesh Rajavenkatanarayanan, Maureen August, Akane Sano, Ashok Veeraraghavan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Implicit Neural Models to Extract Heart Rate from Video
Pradyumna Chari, Anirudh Bindiganavale Harish, Adnan Armouti, Alexander Vilesov, Sanjit Sarda, Laleh Jalilian, Achuta Kadambi |
ECCV (83) | 2 |
| 2022 | Blending camera and 77 GHz radar sensing for equitable, robust plethysmographyabstractWith the resurgence of non-contact vital sign sensing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, remote heart-rate monitoring has gained significant prominence. Many existing methods use cameras; however previous work shows a performance loss for darker skin tones. In this paper, we show through light transport analysis that the camera modality is fundamentally biased against darker skin tones. We propose to reduce this bias through multi-modal fusion with a complementary and fairer modality - radar. Through a novel debiasing oriented fusion framework, we achieve performance gains over all tested baselines and achieve skin tone fairness improvements over the RGB modality. That is, the associated Pareto frontier between performance and fairness is improved when compared to the RGB modality. In addition, performance improvements are obtained over the radar-based method, with small trade-offs in fairness. We also open-source the largest multi-modal remote heart-rate estimation dataset of paired camera and radar measurements with a focus on skin tone representation. Alexander Vilesov, Pradyumna Chari, Adnan Armouti, Anirudh Bindiganavale Harish, Kimaya Kulkarni, Ananya Deoghare, Laleh Jalilian, Achuta Kadambi |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 4 |
| 2020 | Trimodal Attention Module for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (Student Abstract)abstractIn our research, we propose a new multimodal fusion architecture for the task of sentiment analysis. The 3 modalities used in this paper are text, audio and video. Most of the current methods deal with either a feature level or a decision level fusion. In contrast, we propose an attention-based deep neural network and a training approach to facilitate both feature and decision level fusion. Our network effectively leverages information across all three modalities using a 2 stage fusion process. We test our network on the individual utterance based contextual information extracted from the CMU-MOSI Dataset. A comparison is drawn between the state-of-the-art and our network. Anirudh Bindiganavale Harish, Fatiha Sadat |
AAAI | 1 |