Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen Keeley
dblp:266/2876
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3920-4540ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design › bayesian experimental design
bayesian active learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Semi-parametric Model for Decision Making in High-Dimensional Sensory Discrimination Tasks · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Semi-parametric Model for Decision Making in High-Dimensional Sensory Discrimination Tasks · AAAI 2023 |
Computing education
AI education |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020 · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Semi-parametric Model for Decision Making in High-Dimensional Sensory Discrimination Tasks · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
psychometric function · 0.7gaussian process · 0.7bayesian active learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable inference of functional neural connectivity at submillisecond timescalesabstractThe Poisson Generalized Linear Model (GLM) is a foundational tool for analyzing neural spike train data.
However, standard implementations rely on discretizing spike times into binned count data, limiting temporal resolution and scalability. Here, we develop stochastic optimization methods and polynomial approximations to the continuous-time analog of these models, and show them to be advantageous over their discrete-time counterparts. Further, we propose using a set of exponentially scaled Laguerre polynomials as an orthogonal temporal basis, which improves filter identification and yields closed-form integral solutions under the polynomial approximation. Applied to both synthetic and real spike-time data from rodent hippocampus, our methods demonstrate superior accuracy and scalability compared to traditional binned GLMs, enabling functional connectivity inference in large-scale neural recordings that are temporally precise on the order of synaptic dynamical timescales. We provide open-source implementations of both MC and PA estimators, optimized for GPU acceleration, to facilitate adoption in the neuroscience community. Arina Medvedeva, Edoardo Balzani, Alex H. Williams, Stephen Keeley |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | Response Time Improves Gaussian Process Models for Perception and PreferencesabstractModels for human choice prediction in preference learning and perception science often use binary response data, requiring many samples to accurately learn latent utilities or perceptual intensities. The response time (RT) to make each choice captures additional information about the decision process, but existing models incorporating RTs for choice prediction do so in a fully parametric way or over discrete inputs. At the same time, state-of-the-art Gaussian process (GP) models of perception and preferences operate on choices only, ignoring RTs. We propose two approaches for incorporating RTs into GP preference and perception models. The first is based on stacking GP models, and the second uses a novel differentiable approximation to the likelihood of the diffusion decision model (DDM), the de-facto standard model for choice RTs. Our RT-choice GPs enable better latent value estimation and held-out choice prediction relative to baselines, which we demonstrate on three real-world multivariate datasets covering both human psychophysics and preference learning. Michael Shvartsman, Benjamin Letham, Eytan Bakshy, Stephen Keeley |
UAI | 4 |
| 2023 | A Semi-parametric Model for Decision Making in High-Dimensional Sensory Discrimination TasksabstractPsychometric functions typically characterize binary sensory decisions along a single stimulus dimension. However, real-life sensory tasks vary along a greater variety of dimensions (e.g. color, contrast and luminance for visual stimuli). Approaches to characterizing high-dimensional sensory spaces either require strong parametric assumptions about these additional contextual dimensions, or fail to leverage known properties of classical psychometric curves. We overcome both limitations by introducing a semi-parametric model of sensory discrimination that applies traditional psychophysical models along a stimulus intensity dimension, but puts Gaussian process (GP) priors on the parameters of these models with respect to the remaining dimensions. By combining the flexibility of the GP with the deep literature on parametric psychophysics, our semi-parametric models achieve good performance with much less data than baselines on both synthetic and real-world, high-dimensional psychophysics datasets. We additionally show strong performance in a Bayesian active learning setting, and present a novel active learning paradigm for the semi-parametric model. Stephen Keeley, Benjamin Letham, Craig Sanders, Chase Tymms, Michael Shvartsman |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Model AI Assignments 2020abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of nine AI assignments from the 2020 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http://modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Stephen Keeley, Michael Guerzhoy, Wolfgang Hönig, Jiaoyang Li 0001, Sven Koenig, Ameet Soni, Krista Thomason, Lisa Zhang 0003, Bibin Sebastian, Cinjon Resnick, Avital Oliver, Surya Bhupatiraju, Kumar Krishna Agrawal, James Allingham, Sejong Yoon, Jonathan Chen, Tom Larsen, Marion Neumann, Narges Norouzi, Ryan Hausen, Matthew Evett |
AAAI | 2 |