Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bingcong Xue
dblp:266/4444
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3255-0229ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Knowledge graphs · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 66% Information extraction and text analysis · 34% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
attribute extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | AtTGen: Attribute Tree Generation for Real-World Attribute Joint Extraction · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph quality
knowledge graph error detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Knowledge Graph Quality Management: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Knowledge Graph Quality Management: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.6 | 2 | 2023 | The Value of Paraphrase for Knowledge Base Predicates · AAAI 2020 Knowledge Graph Quality Management: A Comprehensive Survey · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
paraphrase extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Value of Paraphrase for Knowledge Base Predicates · AAAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | AtTGen: Attribute Tree Generation for Real-World Attribute Joint Extraction · ACL (1) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine mining · 0.9crowdsourcing · 0.9text-to-tree generation model · 0.7survey · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | AtTGen: Attribute Tree Generation for Real-World Attribute Joint ExtractionabstractAttribute extraction aims to identify attribute names and the corresponding values from descriptive texts, which is the foundation for extensive downstream applications such as knowledge graph construction, search engines, and e-Commerce.In previous studies, attribute extraction is generally treated as a classification problem for predicting attribute types or a sequence tagging problem for labeling attribute values, where two paradigms, i.e., closed-world and open-world assumption, are involved.However, both of these paradigms have limitations in terms of real-world applications.And prior studies attempting to integrate these paradigms through ensemble, pipeline, and co-training models, still face challenges like cascading errors, high computational overhead, and difficulty in training.To address these existing problems, this paper presents Attribute Tree, a unified formulation for realworld attribute extraction application, where closed-world, open-world, and semi-open attribute extraction tasks are modeled uniformly.Then a text-to-tree generation model, AtTGen, is proposed to learn annotations from different scenarios efficiently and consistently.Experiments demonstrate that our proposed paradigm well covers various scenarios for real-world applications, and the model achieves state-ofthe-art, outperforming existing methods by a large margin on three datasets.Our code, pretrained model, and datasets are available at https://github.com/lsvih/AtTGen. Yanzeng Li, Bingcong Xue, Ruoyu Zhang 0003, Lei Zou 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Knowledge Graph Quality Management: A Comprehensive SurveyabstractAs a powerful expression of human knowledge in a structural form, knowledge graph (KG) has drawn great attention from both the academia and the industry and a large number of construction and application technologies have been proposed. Large-scale knowledge graphs such as DBpedia, YAGO and Wikidata are published and widely used in various tasks. However, most of them are far from perfect and have many quality issues. For example, they may contain inaccurate or outdated entries and do not cover enough facts, which limits their credibility and further utility. Data quality has a long research history in the field of traditional relational data and recently attracts more knowledge graph experts. In this paper, we provide a systematic and comprehensive review of the quality management on knowledge graphs, covering overall research topics about not only quality issues, dimentions and metrics, but also quality management processes from quality assessment and error detection, to error correction and KG completion. We categorize existing works in terms of target goals and used methods for better understanding. In the end, we discuss some key issues and possible directions on knowledge graph quality management for further research. Bingcong Xue, Lei Zou 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2022 | Introducing Semantic Information for Numerical Attribute Prediction over Knowledge Graphs
Bingcong Xue, Yanzeng Li, Lei Zou 0001 |
ISWC | 1 |
| 2020 | The Value of Paraphrase for Knowledge Base PredicatesabstractParaphrase, i.e., differing textual realizations of the same meaning, has proven useful for many natural language processing (NLP) applications. Collecting paraphrase for predicates in knowledge bases (KBs) is the key to comprehend the RDF triples in KBs. Existing works have published some paraphrase datasets automatically extracted from large corpora, but have too many redundant pairs or don't cover enough predicates, which cannot be improved by computer only and need the help of human beings. This paper shows a full process of collecting large-scale and high-quality paraphrase dictionaries for predicates in knowledge bases, which takes advantage of existing datasets and combines the technologies of machine mining and crowdsourcing. Our dataset comprises 2284 distinct predicates in DBpedia and 31130 paraphrase pairs in total, the quality of which is a great leap over previous works. Then it is demonstrated that such good paraphrase dictionaries can do great help to natural language processing tasks such as question answering and language generation. We also publish our own dictionary for further research. Bingcong Xue, Sen Hu 0005, Lei Zou 0001, Jiashu Cheng |
AAAI | 1 |