Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jindou Dai
dblp:266/4914
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution Networks · AAAI 2024 A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Network · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph convolutional network
hyperbolic graph convolutional network |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution Networks · AAAI 2024 A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Network · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution Networks · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › deep graph neural network
over-smoothing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution Networks · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Network · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional Network · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design › pooling
bilinear pooling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Bilinear Pooling: A Coding Perspective · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
feature fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Bilinear Pooling: A Coding Perspective · AAAI 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Bilinear Pooling: A Coding Perspective · AAAI 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Revisiting Bilinear Pooling: A Coding Perspective · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
residual connections · 0.8product manifold · 0.8hyperdrop · 0.8manifold-preserving convolution · 0.5hyperbolic feature transformation · 0.5einstein midpoint · 0.5factorized bilinear coding · 0.4coding-pooling formulation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution NetworksabstractHyperbolic graph convolutional networks (HGCNs) have demonstrated representational capabilities of modeling hierarchical-structured graphs. However, as in general GCNs, over-smoothing may occur as the number of model layers increases, limiting the representation capabilities of most current HGCN models. In this paper, we propose residual hyperbolic graph convolutional networks (R-HGCNs) to address the over-smoothing problem. We introduce a hyperbolic residual connection function to overcome the over-smoothing problem, and also theoretically prove the effectiveness of the hyperbolic residual function. Moreover, we use product manifolds and HyperDrop to facilitate the R-HGCNs. The distinctive features of the R-HGCNs are as follows: (1) The hyperbolic residual connection preserves the initial node information in each layer and adds a hyperbolic identity mapping to prevent node features from being indistinguishable. (2) Product manifolds in R-HGCNs have been set up with different origin points in different components to facilitate the extraction of feature information from a wider range of perspectives, which enhances the representing capability of R-HGCNs. (3) HyperDrop adds multiplicative Gaussian noise into hyperbolic representations, such that perturbations can be added to alleviate the over-fitting problem without deconstructing the hyperbolic geometry. Experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of R-HGCNs under various graph convolution layers and different structures of product manifolds. Yangkai Xue, Jindou Dai, Zhipeng Lu 0003, Yuwei Wu 0001, Yunde Jia |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Infinite-dimensional feature aggregation via a factorized bilinear model
Jindou Dai, Yuwei Wu 0001, Zhi Gao 0002, Yunde Jia |
Pattern Recognit. | 1 |
| 2021 | A Hyperbolic-to-Hyperbolic Graph Convolutional NetworkabstractHyperbolic graph convolutional networks (GCNs) demonstrate powerful representation ability to model graphs with hierarchical structure. Existing hyperbolic GCNs resort to tangent spaces to realize graph convolution on hyperbolic manifolds, which is inferior because tangent space is only a local approximation of a manifold. In this paper, we propose a hyperbolic-to-hyperbolic graph convolutional network (H2H-GCN) that directly works on hyperbolic manifolds. Specifically, we developed a manifold-preserving graph convolution that consists of a hyperbolic feature transformation and a hyperbolic neighborhood aggregation. The hyperbolic feature transformation works as linear transformation on hyperbolic manifolds. It ensures the transformed node representations still lie on the hyperbolic manifold by imposing the orthogonal constraint on the transformation sub-matrix. The hyperbolic neighborhood aggregation updates each node representation via the Einstein midpoint. The H2H-GCN avoids the distortion caused by tangent space approximations and keeps the global hyperbolic structure. Extensive experiments show that the H2H-GCN achieves substantial improvements on the link prediction, node classification, and graph classification tasks. Jindou Dai, Yuwei Wu 0001, Zhi Gao 0002, Yunde Jia |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Revisiting Bilinear Pooling: A Coding PerspectiveabstractBilinear pooling has achieved state-of-the-art performance on fusing features in various machine learning tasks, owning to its ability to capture complex associations between features. Despite the success, bilinear pooling suffers from redundancy and burstiness issues, mainly due to the rank-one property of the resulting representation. In this paper, we prove that bilinear pooling is indeed a similarity-based coding-pooling formulation. This establishment then enables us to devise a new feature fusion algorithm, the factorized bilinear coding (FBC) method, to overcome the drawbacks of the bilinear pooling. We show that FBC can generate compact and discriminative representations with substantially fewer parameters. Experiments on two challenging tasks, namely image classification and visual question answering, demonstrate that our method surpasses the bilinear pooling technique by a large margin. Zhi Gao 0002, Yuwei Wu 0001, Xiaoxun Zhang, Jindou Dai, Yunde Jia, Mehrtash Harandi |
AAAI | 4 |