Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Zeiberg

dblp:266/4979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6919-7572ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning paradigms · 44% Learning theory · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 26%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.712023
Leveraging Structure for Improved Classification of Grouped Biased Data · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
semi-supervised classification
0.712023
Leveraging Structure for Improved Classification of Grouped Biased Data · AAAI 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics
biological network analysis
0.512021
Classification in biological networks with hypergraphlet kernels · Bioinform. 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
class distribution estimation
0.412020
Fast Nonparametric Estimation of Class Proportions in the Positive-Unlabeled Classification Setting · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.412020
Fast Nonparametric Estimation of Class Proportions in the Positive-Unlabeled Classification Setting · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation
0.112020
Fast Nonparametric Estimation of Class Proportions in the Positive-Unlabeled Classification Setting · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probability calibration · 0.7partition-projected invariance · 0.7kernel methods · 0.5hypergraph edit distance · 0.5distance-based sampling · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Leveraging Structure for Improved Classification of Grouped Biased Data
abstract
We consider semi-supervised binary classification for applications in which data points are naturally grouped (e.g., survey responses grouped by state) and the labeled data is biased (e.g., survey respondents are not representative of the population). The groups overlap in the feature space and consequently the input-output patterns are related across the groups. To model the inherent structure in such data, we assume the partition-projected class-conditional invariance across groups, defined in terms of the group-agnostic feature space. We demonstrate that under this assumption, the group carries additional information about the class, over the group-agnostic features, with provably improved area under the ROC curve. Further assuming invariance of partition-projected class-conditional distributions across both labeled and unlabeled data, we derive a semi-supervised algorithm that explicitly leverages the structure to learn an optimal, group-aware, probability-calibrated classifier, despite the bias in the labeled data. Experiments on synthetic and real data demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm over suitable baselines and ablative models, spanning standard supervised and semi-supervised learning approaches, with and without incorporating the group directly as a feature.
Daniel Zeiberg, Shantanu Jain, Predrag Radivojac
AAAI1
2021 Classification in biological networks with hypergraphlet kernels
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biological and cellular systems are often modeled as graphs in which vertices represent objects of interest (genes, proteins and drugs) and edges represent relational ties between these objects (binds-to, interacts-with and regulates). This approach has been highly successful owing to the theory, methodology and software that support analysis and learning on graphs. Graphs, however, suffer from information loss when modeling physical systems due to their inability to accurately represent multiobject relationships. Hypergraphs, a generalization of graphs, provide a framework to mitigate information loss and unify disparate graph-based methodologies. RESULTS: We present a hypergraph-based approach for modeling biological systems and formulate vertex classification, edge classification and link prediction problems on (hyper)graphs as instances of vertex classification on (extended, dual) hypergraphs. We then introduce a novel kernel method on vertex- and edge-labeled (colored) hypergraphs for analysis and learning. The method is based on exact and inexact (via hypergraph edit distances) enumeration of hypergraphlets; i.e. small hypergraphs rooted at a vertex of interest. We empirically evaluate this method on fifteen biological networks and show its potential use in a positive-unlabeled setting to estimate the interactome sizes in various species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/jlugomar/hypergraphlet-kernels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jose Lugo-Martinez, Daniel Zeiberg, Thomas Gaudelet, Noël Malod-Dognin, Natasa Przulj, Predrag Radivojac
Bioinform.2
2020 Fast Nonparametric Estimation of Class Proportions in the Positive-Unlabeled Classification Setting
abstract
Estimating class proportions has emerged as an important direction in positive-unlabeled learning. Well-estimated class priors are key to accurate approximation of posterior distributions and are necessary for the recovery of true classification performance. While significant progress has been made in the past decade, there remains a need for accurate strategies that scale to big data. Motivated by this need, we propose an intuitive and fast nonparametric algorithm to estimate class proportions. Unlike any of the previous methods, our algorithm uses a sampling strategy to repeatedly (1) draw an example from the set of positives, (2) record the minimum distance to any of the unlabeled examples, and (3) remove the nearest unlabeled example. We show that the point of sharp increase in the recorded distances corresponds to the desired proportion of positives in the unlabeled set and train a deep neural network to identify that point. Our distance-based algorithm is evaluated on forty datasets and compared to all currently available methods. We provide evidence that this new approach results in the most accurate performance and can be readily used on large datasets.
Daniel Zeiberg, Shantanu Jain, Predrag Radivojac
AAAI1