Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qibin Xu
dblp:266/5578
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Question-Driven Purchasing Propensity Analysis for Recommendation · AAAI 2020 |
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Question-Driven Purchasing Propensity Analysis for Recommendation · AAAI 2020 |
Recommender systems
review-based recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Question-Driven Purchasing Propensity Analysis for Recommendation · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.9attention mechanism · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Question-Driven Purchasing Propensity Analysis for RecommendationabstractMerchants of e-commerce Websites expect recommender systems to entice more consumption which is highly correlated with the customers' purchasing propensity. However, most existing recommender systems focus on customers' general preference rather than purchasing propensity often governed by instant demands which we deem to be well conveyed by the questions asked by customers. A typical recommendation scenario is: Bob wants to buy a cell phone which can play the game PUBG. He is interested in HUAWEI P20 and asks “can PUBG run smoothly on this phone?” under it. Then our system will be triggered to recommend the most eligible cell phones to him. Intuitively, diverse user questions could probably be addressed in reviews written by other users who have similar concerns. To address this recommendation problem, we propose a novel Question-Driven Attentive Neural Network (QDANN) to assess the instant demands of questioners and the eligibility of products based on user generated reviews, and do recommendation accordingly. Without supervision, QDANN can well exploit reviews to achieve this goal. The attention mechanisms can be used to provide explanations for recommendations. We evaluate QDANN in three domains of Taobao. The results show the efficacy of our method and its superiority over baseline methods. Long Chen 0007, Ziyu Guan, Qibin Xu, Huan Sun 0001, Guangyue Lu, Deng Cai 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |