Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rodrigo Pardo-Meza
dblp:266/6218
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 93% Machine learning and data management · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization
cardinality estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query Optimization · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › distributed query optimization
cross-platform query optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query Optimization · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization › cost model
learned cost model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query Optimization · ICDE 2020 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query Optimization · ICDE 2020 |
Machine learning and data management
learned database components |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query Optimization · ICDE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vectorization · 0.4training data generation · 0.4machine learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | ML-based Cross-Platform Query OptimizationabstractCost-based optimization is widely known to suffer from a major weakness: administrators spend a significant amount of time to tune the associated cost models. This problem only gets exacerbated in cross-platform settings as there are many more parameters that need to be tuned. In the era of machine learning (ML), the first step to remedy this problem is to replace the cost model of the optimizer with an ML model. However, such a solution brings in two major challenges. First, the optimizer has to transform a query plan to a vector million times during plan enumeration incurring a very high overhead. Second, a lot of training data is required to effectively train the ML model. We overcome these challenges in Robopt, a novel vector-based optimizer we have built for Rheem, a cross-platform system. Robopt not only uses an ML model to prune the search space but also bases the entire plan enumeration on a set of algebraic operations that operate on vectors, which are a natural fit to the ML model. This leads to both speed-up and scale-up of the enumeration process by exploiting modern CPUs via vectorization. We also accompany Robopt with a scalable training data generator for building its ML model. Our evaluation shows that (i) the vector-based approach is more efficient and scalable than simply using an ML model and (ii) Robopt matches and, in some cases, improves Rheem's cost-based optimizer in choosing good plans without requiring any tuning effort. Zoi Kaoudi, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, Bertty Contreras, Rodrigo Pardo-Meza, Anis Troudi, Sanjay Chawla |
ICDE | 4 |