Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qingyu Song 0001
dblp:266/7092-1
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-9330-0541ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 68% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object counting
crowd counting |
1.5 | 3 | 2021 | Uniformity in Heterogeneity: Diving Deep into Count Interval Partition for Crowd Counting · ICCV 2021 Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds: A Purely Point-Based Framework · ICCV 2021 To Choose or to Fuse? Scale Selection for Crowd Counting · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | To Choose or to Fuse? Scale Selection for Crowd Counting · AAAI 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object localization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds: A Purely Point-Based Framework · ICCV 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
scale variation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | To Choose or to Fuse? Scale Selection for Crowd Counting · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform error partition · 0.5scale-adaptive selection · 0.5pyramid region awareness loss · 0.5point proposal matching · 0.5mean count proxies · 0.5hungarian algorithm · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | To Choose or to Fuse? Scale Selection for Crowd CountingabstractIn this paper, we address the large scale variation problem in crowd counting by taking full advantage of the multi-scale feature representations in a multi-level network. We implement such an idea by keeping the counting error of a patch as small as possible with a proper feature level selection strategy, since a specific feature level tends to perform better for a certain range of scales. However, without scale annotations, it is sub-optimal and error-prone to manually assign the predictions for heads of different scales to specific feature levels. Therefore, we propose a Scale-Adaptive Selection Network (SASNet), which automatically learns the internal correspondence between the scales and the feature levels. Instead of directly using the predictions from the most appropriate feature level as the final estimation, our SASNet also considers the predictions from other feature levels via weighted average, which helps to mitigate the gap between discrete feature levels and continuous scale variation. Since the heads in a local patch share roughly a same scale, we conduct the adaptive selection strategy in a patch-wise style. However, pixels within a patch contribute different counting errors due to the various difficulty degrees of learning. Thus, we further propose a Pyramid Region Awareness Loss (PRA Loss) to recursively select the most hard sub-regions within a patch until reaching the pixel level. With awareness of whether the parent patch is over-estimated or under-estimated, the fine-grained optimization with the PRA Loss for these region-aware hard pixels helps to alleviate the inconsistency problem between training target and evaluation metric. The state-of-the-art results on four datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach. The code will be available at: https://github.com/TencentYoutuResearch/CrowdCounting-SASNet. Qingyu Song 0001, Changan Wang, Yabiao Wang, Ying Tai, Chengjie Wang 0001, Jian Wu 0001, Jiayi Ma 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Rethinking Counting and Localization in Crowds: A Purely Point-Based FrameworkabstractLocalizing individuals in crowds is more in accordance with the practical demands of subsequent high-level crowd analysis tasks than simply counting. However, existing localization based methods relying on intermediate representations (i.e., density maps or pseudo boxes) serving as learning targets are counter-intuitive and error-prone. In this paper, we propose a purely point-based framework for joint crowd counting and individual localization. For this framework, instead of merely reporting the absolute counting error at image level, we propose a new metric, called density Normalized Average Precision (nAP), to provide more comprehensive and more precise performance evaluation. Moreover, we design an intuitive solution under this framework, which is called Point to Point Network (P2PNet). P2PNet discards superfluous steps and directly predicts a set of point proposals to represent heads in an image, being consistent with the human annotation results. By thorough analysis, we reveal the key step towards implementing such a novel idea is to assign optimal learning targets for these proposals. Therefore, we propose to conduct this crucial association in an one-to-one matching manner using the Hungarian algorithm. The P2PNet not only significantly surpasses state-of-the-art methods on popular counting benchmarks, but also achieves promising localization accuracy. The codes will be available at: TencentYoutuResearch/CrowdCounting-P2PNet. Qingyu Song 0001, Changan Wang, Zhengkai Jiang 0001, Yabiao Wang, Ying Tai, Chengjie Wang 0001, Feiyue Huang, Yang Wu 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Uniformity in Heterogeneity: Diving Deep into Count Interval Partition for Crowd CountingabstractRecently, the problem of inaccurate learning targets in crowd counting draws increasing attention. Inspired by a few pioneering work, we solve this problem by trying to predict the indices of pre-defined interval bins of counts instead of the count values themselves. However, an inappropriate interval setting might make the count error contributions from different intervals extremely imbalanced, leading to inferior counting performance. Therefore, we propose a novel count interval partition criterion called Uniform Error Partition (UEP), which always keeps the expected counting error contributions equal for all intervals to minimize the prediction risk. Then to mitigate the inevitably introduced discretization errors in the count quantization process, we propose another criterion called Mean Count Proxies (MCP). The MCP criterion selects the best count proxy for each interval to represent its count value during inference, making the overall expected discretization error of an image nearly negligible. As far as we are aware, this work is the first to delve into such a classification task and ends up with a promising solution for count interval partition. Following the above two theoretically demonstrated criterions, we propose a simple yet effective model termed Uniform Error Partition Network (UEPNet), which achieves state-of-the-art performance on several challenging datasets. The codes will be available at: TencentYoutuResearch/CrowdCounting-UEPNet. Changan Wang, Qingyu Song 0001, Boshen Zhang, Yabiao Wang, Ying Tai, Xuyi Hu, Chengjie Wang 0001, Jiayi Ma 0001, Yang Wu 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |