Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Yannuzzi

dblp:266/9367 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6720-6201ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Multi-agent systems · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 77% Automata and formal languages · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
multi-robot planning
0.812024
Reconfiguration of a 2D Structure Using Spatio-Temporal Planning and Load Transferring · ICRA 2024
Computational geometry › motion planning
reconfiguration
0.412020
Space Ants: Constructing and Reconfiguring Large-Scale Structures with Finite Automata (Media Exposition) · SoCG 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-robot systems
cooperative robot teams
0.212024
Reconfiguration of a 2D Structure Using Spatio-Temporal Planning and Load Transferring · ICRA 2024
Automata and formal languages
finite automata
0.112020
Space Ants: Constructing and Reconfiguring Large-Scale Structures with Finite Automata (Media Exposition) · SoCG 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

target swapping · 0.8spatio-temporal planning · 0.8finite-state robots · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Reconfiguration of a 2D Structure Using Spatio-Temporal Planning and Load Transferring
abstract
We present progress on the problem of reconfiguring a 2D arrangement of building material by a cooperative group of robots. These robots must avoid collisions, deadlocks, and are subjected to the constraint of maintaining connectivity of the structure. We develop two reconfiguration methods, one based on spatio-temporal planning, and one based on target swapping, to increase building efficiency. The first method can significantly reduce planning times compared to other multi-robot planners. The second method helps to reduce the amount of time robots spend waiting for paths to be cleared, and the overall distance traveled by the robots.
Michael Yannuzzi, Peter Kramer 0001, Christian Rieck, Sándor P. Fekete, Aaron T. Becker
ICRA2
2022 Connected Reconfiguration of Polyominoes Amid Obstacles using RRT
abstract
This paper investigates using a sampling-based approach, the RRT*, to reconfigure a 2D set of connected tiles in complex environments, where multiple obstacles might be present. Since the target application is automated building of discrete, cellular structures using mobile robots, there are constraints that determine what tiles can be picked up and where they can be dropped off during reconfiguration. We compare our approach to two algorithms as global and local planners, and show that we are able to find more efficient build sequences using a reasonable amount of samples, in environments with varying degrees of obstacle space.
Michael Yannuzzi, Peter Kramer 0001, Christian Rieck, Aaron T. Becker
IROS2
2020 Space Ants: Constructing and Reconfiguring Large-Scale Structures with Finite Automata (Media Exposition)
abstract
In this video, we consider recognition and reconfiguration of lattice-based cellular structures by very simple robots with only basic functionality. The underlying motivation is the construction and modification of space facilities of enormous dimensions, where the combination of new materials with extremely simple robots promises structures of previously unthinkable size and flexibility. We present algorithmic methods that are able to detect and reconfigure arbitrary polyominoes, based on finite-state robots, while also preserving connectivity of a structure during reconfiguration. Specific results include methods for determining a bounding box, scaling a given arrangement, and adapting more general algorithms for transforming polyominoes.
Amira Abdel-Rahman, Aaron T. Becker, Daniel Biediger, Kenneth C. Cheung, Sándor P. Fekete, Neil Gershenfeld, Sabrina Hugo, Benjamin Jenett, Phillip Keldenich, Eike Niehs, Christian Rieck, Arne Schmidt 0001, Christian Scheffer, Michael Yannuzzi
SoCG14
2020 Recognition and Reconfiguration of Lattice-Based Cellular Structures by Simple Robots
abstract
We consider recognition and reconfiguration of lattice-based cellular structures by very simple robots with only basic functionality. The underlying motivation is the construction and modification of space facilities of enormous dimensions, where the combination of new materials with extremely simple robots promises structures of previously unthinkable size and flexibility; this is also closely related to the newly emerging field of programmable matter. Aiming for large-scale scalability, both in terms of the number of the cellular components of a structure, as well as the number of robots that are being deployed for construction requires simple yet robust robots and mechanisms, while also dealing with various basic constraints, such as connectivity of a structure during reconfiguration. To this end, we propose an approach that combines ultra-light, cellular building materials with extremely simple robots. We develop basic algorithmic methods that are able to detect and reconfigure arbitrary cellular structures, based on robots that have only constant-sized memory. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the feasibility of this approach for specific cellular materials and robots that have been developed at NASA.
Eike Niehs, Arne Schmidt 0001, Christian Scheffer, Daniel Biediger, Michael Yannuzzi, Benjamin Jenett, Amira Abdel-Rahman, Kenneth C. Cheung, Aaron T. Becker, Sándor P. Fekete
ICRA5