Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingqin Yang
dblp:267/1955
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 75% Graph learning · 13% Learning theory · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.7 | 3 | 2024 | Matrix Information Theory for Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 Contrastive Learning is Spectral Clustering on Similarity Graph · ICLR 2024 Information Flow in Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
information-theoretic analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Information Flow in Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
maximum entropy coding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Matrix Information Theory for Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
non-contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Matrix Information Theory for Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
theoretical analysis of contrastive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contrastive Learning is Spectral Clustering on Similarity Graph · ICLR 2024 |
Information retrieval › query reformulation
conversational query rewriting |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Few-Shot Generative Conversational Query Rewriting · SIGIR 2020 |
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › conversational information seeking
conversational search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Few-Shot Generative Conversational Query Rewriting · SIGIR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › negative-free contrastive learning
barlow twins |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Information Flow in Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Information Flow in Self-Supervised Learning · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix mutual information · 0.8matrix joint entropy · 0.8matrix information theory · 0.8matrix alignment loss · 0.8masked autoencoder · 0.8kernel function · 0.8InfoNCE loss · 0.8weak supervision · 0.4self-supervised learning · 0.4GPT-2 · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Contrastive Learning is Spectral Clustering on Similarity GraphabstractContrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised learning method, but we have a limited theoretical understanding of how it works and why it works. In this paper, we prove that contrastive learning with the standard InfoNCE loss is equivalent to spectral clustering on the similarity graph. Using this equivalence as the building block, we extend our analysis to the CLIP model and rigorously characterize how similar multi-modal objects are embedded together. Motivated by our theoretical insights, we introduce the Kernel-InfoNCE loss, incorporating mixtures of kernel functions that outperform the standard Gaussian kernel on several vision datasets. Zhiquan Tan, Yifan Zhang 0029, Jingqin Yang, Yang Yuan 0010 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Information Flow in Self-Supervised LearningabstractIn this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of two dual-branch (Siamese architecture) self-supervised learning approaches, namely Barlow Twins and spectral contrastive learning, through the lens of matrix mutual information. We prove that the loss functions of these methods implicitly optimize both matrix mutual information and matrix joint entropy. This insight prompts us to further explore the category of single-branch algorithms, specifically MAE and U-MAE, for which mutual information and joint entropy become the entropy. Building on this intuition, we introduce the Matrix Variational Masked Auto-Encoder (M-MAE), a novel method that leverages the matrix-based estimation of entropy as a regularizer and subsumes U-MAE as a special case. The empirical evaluations underscore the effectiveness of M-MAE compared with the state-of-the-art methods, including a 3.9% improvement in linear probing ViT-Base, and a 1% improvement in fine-tuning ViT-Large, both on ImageNet. Zhiquan Tan, Jingqin Yang, Weiran Huang 0001, Yang Yuan 0010, Yifan Zhang 0029 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Matrix Information Theory for Self-Supervised LearningabstractThe maximum entropy encoding framework provides a unified perspective for many non-contrastive learning methods like SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and MEC. Inspired by this framework, we introduce Matrix-SSL, a novel approach that leverages matrix information theory to interpret the maximum entropy encoding loss as matrix uniformity loss. Furthermore, Matrix-SSL enhances the maximum entropy encoding method by seamlessly incorporating matrix alignment loss, directly aligning covariance matrices in different branches. Experimental results reveal that Matrix-SSL outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the ImageNet dataset under linear evaluation settings and on MS-COCO for transfer learning tasks. Specifically, when performing transfer learning tasks on MS-COCO, our method outperforms previous SOTA methods such as MoCo v2 and BYOL up to 3.3% with only 400 epochs compared to 800 epochs pre-training. We also try to introduce representation learning into the language modeling regime by fine-tuning a 7B model using matrix cross-entropy loss, with a margin of 3.1% on the GSM8K dataset over the standard cross-entropy loss. Yifan Zhang 0029, Zhiquan Tan, Jingqin Yang, Weiran Huang 0001, Yang Yuan 0010 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2020 | Few-Shot Generative Conversational Query RewritingabstractConversational query rewriting aims to reformulate a concise conversational query to a fully specified, context-independent query that can be effectively handled by existing information retrieval systems. This paper presents a few-shot generative approach to conversational query rewriting. We develop two methods, based on rules and self-supervised learning, to generate weak supervision data using large amounts of ad hoc search sessions, and to fine-tune GPT-2 to rewrite conversational queries. On the TREC Conversational Assistance Track, our weakly supervised GPT-2 rewriter improves the state-of-the-art ranking accuracy by 12%, only using very limited amounts of manual query rewrites. In the zero-shot learning setting, the rewriter still gives a comparable result to previous state-of-the-art systems. Our analyses reveal that GPT-2 effectively picks up the task syntax and learns to capture context dependencies, even for hard cases that involve group references and long-turn dependencies. Shi Yu 0001, Jiahua Liu, Jingqin Yang, Chenyan Xiong, Paul N. Bennett, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Zhiyuan Liu 0001 |
SIGIR | 3 |