EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arash Nasr-Esfahany
dblp:267/2339
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4844-6875ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Computer networks · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 41% Time series and sequential data · 10% Language models and text generation · 10% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 71% Electronic design automation · 29% | |
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Content delivery and video streaming · 53% Network performance modeling · 31% Datacenter networks · 9% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Content delivery and video streaming
adaptive video streaming |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Predict, Prune, Play: Efficient Video Playback Optimization Under Device Diversity and Drift · NSDI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven Environments · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
direct alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
non-stationary environments |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven Environments · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
online reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven Environments · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven Environments · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences · NeurIPS 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Electronic design automation
design space exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › surrogate modeling
machine-learning-based performance modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Electronic design automation › design space exploration
microarchitecture design space exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
processor performance modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Counterfactual Identifiability of Bijective Causal Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
structured generative models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Counterfactual Identifiability of Bijective Causal Models · ICML 2023 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › statistical analysis
causal inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CausalSim: A Causal Framework for Unbiased Trace-Driven Simulation · NSDI 2023 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
trace-driven simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CausalSim: A Causal Framework for Unbiased Trace-Driven Simulation · NSDI 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › video segmentation
video semantic segmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Real-Time Video Inference on Edge Devices via Adaptive Model Streaming · ICCV 2021 |
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Predict, Prune, Play: Efficient Video Playback Optimization Under Device Diversity and Drift · NSDI 2026 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › architectural simulation
cycle-accurate simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025 |
Edge and fog computing
edge inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Real-Time Video Inference on Edge Devices via Adaptive Model Streaming · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.6pruning · 1.0prediction · 1.0online knowledge distillation · 1.0adaptive sampling · 1.0local constraint · 0.9direct policy alignment · 0.9catastrophic forgetting mitigation · 0.9analytical modeling · 0.9deep conditional generative model · 0.7causal inference · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Predict, Prune, Play: Efficient Video Playback Optimization Under Device Diversity and Drift
Harsha Sharma, Pouya Hamadanian, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Zahaib Akhtar, Mohammad Alizadeh |
NSDI | 3 |
| 2025 | Online Reinforcement Learning in Non-Stationary Context-Driven EnvironmentsabstractWe study online reinforcement learning (RL) in non-stationary environments, where a time-varying exogenous context process affects the environment dynamics. Online RL is challenging in such environments due to "catastrophic forgetting" (CF). The agent tends to forget prior knowledge as it trains on new experiences. Prior approaches to mitigate this issue assume task labels (which are often not available in practice), employ brittle regularization heuristics, or use off-policy methods that suffer from instability and poor performance.
We present Locally Constrained Policy Optimization (LCPO), an online RL approach that combats CF by anchoring policy outputs on old experiences while optimizing the return on current experiences. To perform this anchoring, LCPO locally constrains policy optimization using samples from experiences that lie outside of the current context distribution. We evaluate LCPO in Mujoco, classic control and computer systems environments with a variety of synthetic and real context traces, and find that it outperforms a variety of baselines in the non-stationary setting, while achieving results on-par with a "prescient" agent trained offline across all context traces.
LCPO's source code is available at https://github.com/pouyahmdn/LCPO. Pouya Hamadanian, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Malte Schwarzkopf, Siddhartha Sen 0001, Mohammad Alizadeh |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML FusionabstractCycle-level simulators such as gem5 are widely used in microarchitecture design, but they are prohibitively slow for large-scale design space explorations.We present Concorde, a new methodology for learning fast and accurate performance models of microarchitectures.Unlike existing simulators and learning approaches that emulate each instruction, Concorde predicts the behavior of a program based on compact performance distributions that capture the impact of different microarchitectural components.It derives these performance distributions using simple analytical models that estimate bounds on performance induced by each microarchitectural component, providing a simple yet rich representation of a program's performance characteristics across a large space of microarchitectural parameters.Experiments show that Concorde is more than five orders of magnitude faster than a reference cycle-level simulator, with about 2% average Cycles-Per-Instruction (CPI) prediction error across a range of SPEC, open-source, and proprietary benchmarks.This enables rapid design-space exploration and performance sensitivity analyses that are currently infeasible, e.g., in about an hour, we conducted a first-of-its-kind fine-grained performance attribution to different microarchitectural components across a diverse set of programs, requiring nearly 150 million CPI evaluations. Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Mohammad Alizadeh, Victor Lee, Hanna Alam, Brett W. Coon, David E. Culler, Vidushi Dadu, Martin Dixon, Henry M. Levy, Santosh Pandey 0001, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Amir Yazdanbakhsh |
ISCA | 1 |
| 2025 | Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous PreferencesabstractAlignment with human preferences is commonly framed using a universal reward function, even though human preferences are inherently heterogeneous. We formalize this heterogeneity by introducing user types and examine the limits of the homogeneity assumption.
We show that aligning to heterogeneous preferences with a single policy is best achieved using the average reward across user types. However, this requires additional information about annotators. We examine improvements under different information settings, focusing on direct alignment methods. We find that minimal information can yield first-order improvements, while full feedback from each user type leads to consistent learning of the optimal policy. Surprisingly, however, no sample-efficient consistent direct loss exists in this latter setting. These results reveal a fundamental tension between consistency and sample efficiency in direct policy alignment. Ali Shirali, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Abdullah Omar Alomar, Parsa Mirtaheri, Rediet Abebe, Ariel D. Procaccia |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | m3: Accurate Flow-Level Performance Estimation using Machine LearningabstractData center network operators often need accurate estimates of aggregate network performance. Unfortunately, existing methods for estimating aggregate network statistics are either inaccurate or too slow to be practical at the data center scale. Chenning Li, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Kevin Zhao, Kimia Noorbakhsh, Prateesh Goyal, Mohammad Alizadeh, Thomas E. Anderson |
SIGCOMM | 2 |
| 2023 | Counterfactual Identifiability of Bijective Causal ModelsabstractWe study counterfactual identifiability in causal models with bijective generation mechanisms (BGM), a class that generalizes several widely-used causal models in the literature. We establish their counterfactual identifiability for three common causal structures with unobserved confounding, and propose a practical learning method that casts learning a BGM as structured generative modeling. Learned BGMs enable efficient counterfactual estimation and can be obtained using a variety of deep conditional generative models. We evaluate our techniques in a visual task and demonstrate its application in a real-world video streaming simulation task. Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Mohammad Alizadeh, Devavrat Shah |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | CausalSim: A Causal Framework for Unbiased Trace-Driven Simulation
Abdullah Omar Alomar, Pouya Hamadanian, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Anish Agarwal, Mohammad Alizadeh, Devavrat Shah |
NSDI | 3 |
| 2021 | Real-Time Video Inference on Edge Devices via Adaptive Model StreamingabstractReal-time video inference on edge devices like mobile phones and drones is challenging due to the high computation cost of Deep Neural Networks. We present Adaptive Model Streaming (AMS), a new approach to improving the performance of efficient lightweight models for video inference on edge devices. AMS uses a remote server to continually train and adapt a small model running on the edge device, boosting its performance on the live video using online knowledge distillation from a large, state-of-the-art model. We discuss the challenges of over-the-network model adaptation for video inference and present several techniques to reduce communication the cost of this approach: avoiding excessive overfitting, updating a small fraction of important model parameters, and adaptive sampling of training frames at edge devices. On the task of video semantic segmentation, our experimental results show 0.4–17.8 percent mean Intersection-over-Union improvement compared to a pretrained model across several video datasets. Our prototype can perform video segmentation at 30 frames-per-second with 40 milliseconds camera-to-label latency on a Samsung Galaxy S10+ mobile phone, using less than 300 Kbps uplink and downlink bandwidth on the device. Mehrdad Khani Shirkoohi, Pouya Hamadanian, Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Mohammad Alizadeh |
ICCV | 3 |