EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pritish Chakraborty
dblp:267/3786
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8875-5819ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 58% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% Efficient and distributed learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 82% Web and social media mining · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Adversarial Attacks for Marked Temporal Point Processes · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
marked temporal point process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Adversarial Attacks for Marked Temporal Point Processes · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
temporal point process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differentiable Adversarial Attacks for Marked Temporal Point Processes · AAAI 2025 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
graph-based retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contextual Tokenization for Graph Inverted Indices · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information retrieval › indexing
inverted index |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contextual Tokenization for Graph Inverted Indices · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
influence maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning and Maximizing Influence in Social Networks Under Capacity Constraints · WSDM 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Contextual Tokenization for Graph Inverted Indices · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
discrete-continuous optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture Models · ICML 2023 |
Web and social media mining
information diffusion |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning and Maximizing Influence in Social Networks Under Capacity Constraints · WSDM 2023 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning and Maximizing Influence in Social Networks Under Capacity Constraints · WSDM 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
discretization · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7greedy algorithm · 1.3gamma-weakly submodular optimization · 1.3permutation learning · 0.9differentiable optimization · 0.9adversarial learning · 0.9submodular optimization · 0.7matroid constraints · 0.7learning models · 0.7learning model · 0.7discrete-continuous optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differentiable Adversarial Attacks for Marked Temporal Point ProcessesabstractMarked temporal point processes (MTPPs) have been shown to be extremely effective in modeling continuous time event sequences (CTESs). In this work, we present adversarial attacks designed specifically for MTPP models. A key criterion for a good adversarial attack is its imperceptibility. For objects such as images or text, this is often achieved by bounding perturbation in some fixed Lp norm-ball. However, similarly minimizing distance norms between two CTESs in the context of MTPPs is challenging due to their sequential nature and varying time-scales and lengths. We address this challenge by first permuting the events and then incorporating the additive noise to the arrival timestamps. However, the worst case optimization of such adversarial attacks is a hard combinatorial problem, requiring exploration across a permutation space that is factorially large in the length of the input sequence. As a result, we propose a novel differentiable scheme - PERMTPP - using which we can perform adversarial attacks by learning to minimize the likelihood, while minimizing the distance between two CTESs. Our experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate the offensive and defensive capabilities, and lower inference times of PERMTPP. Pritish Chakraborty, Rahul R, Srikanta J. Bedathur, Abir De |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Contextual Tokenization for Graph Inverted IndicesabstractRetrieving graphs from a large corpus, that contain a subgraph isomorphic to a given query graph, is a core operation in many real-world applications. While recent multi-vector graph representations and scores based on set alignment and containment can provide accurate subgraph isomorphism tests, their use in retrieval remains limited by their need to score corpus graphs exhaustively.
We introduce CoRGII (COntextual Representation of Graphs for Inverted Indexing), a graph indexing framework in which, starting with a contextual dense graph representation, a differentiable discretization module computes sparse binary codes over a learned latent vocabulary. This text document-like representation allows us to leverage classic, highly optimized inverted indexes, while supporting soft (vector) set containment scores. Improving on this paradigm further, we replace the classical impact score of a `word' on a graph (such as defined by TFIDF or BM25) with a data-driven, trainable impact score.
Crucially, CoRGII is trained end-to-end using only binary relevance labels, without fine-grained supervision of query-to-document set alignments. Extensive experiments show that CoRGII provides better trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy, compared to several baselines. Pritish Chakraborty, Indradyumna Roy, Soumen Chakrabarti, Abir De |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Discrete Continuous Optimization Framework for Simultaneous Clustering and Training in Mixture ModelsabstractWe study a new framework of learning mixture models via automatic clustering called PRESTO, wherein we optimize a joint objective function on the model parameters and the partitioning, with each model tailored to perform well on its specific cluster. In contrast to prior work, we do not assume any generative model for the data. We convert our training problem to a joint parameter estimation cum a subset selection problem, subject to a matroid span constraint. This allows us to reduce our problem into a constrained set function minimization problem, where the underlying objective is monotone and approximately submodular. We then propose a new joint discrete-continuous optimization algorithm that achieves a bounded approximation guarantee for our problem. We show that PRESTO outperforms several alternative methods. Finally, we study PRESTO in the context of resource-efficient deep learning, where we train smaller resource-constrained models on each partition and show that it outperforms existing data partitioning and model pruning/knowledge distillation approaches, which in contrast to PRESTO, require large initial (teacher) models. Parth Vipul Sangani, Arjun Shashank Kashettiwar, Pritish Chakraborty, Bhuvan Reddy Gangula, Durga Sivasubramanian, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Rishabh Iyer 0001, Abir De |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Learning and Maximizing Influence in Social Networks Under Capacity ConstraintsabstractInfluence maximization (IM) refers to the problem of finding a subset of nodes in a network through which we could maximize our reach to other nodes in the network. This set is often called the "seed set", and its constituent nodes maximize the social diffusion process. IM has previously been studied in various settings, including under a time deadline, subject to constraints such as that of budget or coverage, and even subject to measures other than the centrality of nodes. The solution approach has generally been to prove that the objective function is submodular, or has a submodular proxy, and thus has a close greedy approximation. In this paper, we explore a variant of the IM problem where we wish to reach out to and maximize the probability of infection of a small subset of bounded capacity K. We show that this problem does not exhibit the same submodular guarantees as the original IM problem, for which we resort to the theory of gamma-weakly submodular functions. Subsequently, we develop a greedy algorithm that maximizes our objective despite the lack of submodularity. We also develop a suitable learning model that out-competes baselines on the task of predicting the top-K infected nodes, given a seed set as input. Pritish Chakraborty, Sayan Ranu, Krishna Sri Ipsit Mantri, Abir De |
WSDM | 1 |