EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kristopher T. Jensen
dblp:267/5296
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 49% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Reinforcement learning · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › shared representation
feature sharing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience
neural coding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent dynamics learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | iLQR-VAE : control-based learning of input-driven dynamics with applications to neural data · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | iLQR-VAE : control-based learning of input-driven dynamics with applications to neural data · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Natural continual learning: success is a journey, not (just) a destination · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
gaussian process factor analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
scalable variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent gaussian model
gaussian process latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
non-gaussian noise model · 1.0automatic relevance determination · 1.0cross-validation · 0.9latent manifold learning · 0.7ensemble learning · 0.7variational autoencoder · 0.6iLQR · 0.6natural gradient · 0.5gradient projection · 0.5bayesian regularization · 0.5variational inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Some and Done? Temporally extended decisions with very few rollouts
Sixing Chen, Kristopher T. Jensen, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | A neural network model trained on free recall learns the method of loci
Moufan Li, Kristopher T. Jensen, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2023 | Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles
Martin Bjerke, Lukas Schott, Kristopher T. Jensen, Claudia Battistin, David A. Klindt, Benjamin A. Dunn |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | iLQR-VAE : control-based learning of input-driven dynamics with applications to neural data
Marine Schimel, Ta-Chu Kao, Kristopher T. Jensen, Guillaume Hennequin |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Scalable Bayesian GPFA with automatic relevance determination and discrete noise modelsabstractLatent variable models are ubiquitous in the exploratory analysis of neural population recordings, where they allow researchers to summarize the activity of large populations of neurons in lower dimensional ‘latent’ spaces. Existing methods can generally be categorized into (i) Bayesian methods that facilitate flexible incorporation of prior knowledge and uncertainty estimation, but which typically do not scale to large datasets; and (ii) highly parameterized methods without explicit priors that scale better but often struggle in the low-data regime. Here, we bridge this gap by developing a fully Bayesian yet scalable version of Gaussian process factor analysis (bGPFA), which models neural data as arising from a set of inferred latent processes with a prior that encourages smoothness over time. Additionally, bGPFA uses automatic relevance determination to infer the dimensionality of neural activity directly from the training data during optimization. To enable the analysis of continuous recordings without trial structure, we introduce a novel variational inference strategy that scales near-linearly in time and also allows for non-Gaussian noise models appropriate for electrophysiological recordings. We apply bGPFA to continuous recordings spanning 30 minutes with over 14 million data points from primate motor and somatosensory cortices during a self-paced reaching task. We show that neural activity progresses from an initial state at target onset to a reach- specific preparatory state well before movement onset. The distance between these initial and preparatory latent states is predictive of reaction times across reaches, suggesting that such preparatory dynamics have behavioral relevance despite the lack of externally imposed delay periods. Additionally, bGPFA discovers latent processes that evolve over slow timescales on the order of several seconds and contain complementary information about reaction time. These timescales are longer than those revealed by methods which focus on individual movement epochs and may reflect fluctuations in e.g. task engagement. Kristopher T. Jensen, Ta-Chu Kao, Jasmine Stone, Guillaume Hennequin |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Natural continual learning: success is a journey, not (just) a destinationabstractBiological agents are known to learn many different tasks over the course of their lives, and to be able to revisit previous tasks and behaviors with little to no loss in performance. In contrast, artificial agents are prone to ‘catastrophic forgetting’ whereby performance on previous tasks deteriorates rapidly as new ones are acquired. This shortcoming has recently been addressed using methods that encourage parameters to stay close to those used for previous tasks. This can be done by (i) using specific parameter regularizers that map out suitable destinations in parameter space, or (ii) guiding the optimization journey by projecting gradients into subspaces that do not interfere with previous tasks. However, these methods often exhibit subpar performance in both feedforward and recurrent neural networks, with recurrent networks being of interest to the study of neural dynamics supporting biological continual learning. In this work, we propose Natural Continual Learning (NCL), a new method that unifies weight regularization and projected gradient descent. NCL uses Bayesian weight regularization to encourage good performance on all tasks at convergence and combines this with gradient projection using the prior precision, which prevents catastrophic forgetting during optimization. Our method outperforms both standard weight regularization techniques and projection based approaches when applied to continual learning problems in feedforward and recurrent networks. Finally, the trained networks evolve task-specific dynamics that are strongly preserved as new tasks are learned, similar to experimental findings in biological circuits. Ta-Chu Kao, Kristopher T. Jensen, Gido M. van de Ven, Alberto Bernacchia, Guillaume Hennequin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Manifold GPLVMs for discovering non-Euclidean latent structure in neural dataabstractA common problem in neuroscience is to elucidate the collective neural representations of behaviorally important variables such as head direction, spatial location, upcoming movements, or mental spatial transformations. Often, these latent variables are internal constructs not directly accessible to the experimenter. Here, we propose a new probabilistic latent variable model to simultaneously identify the latent state and the way each neuron contributes to its representation in an unsupervised way. In contrast to previous models which assume Euclidean latent spaces, we embrace the fact that latent states often belong to symmetric manifolds such as spheres, tori, or rotation groups of various dimensions. We therefore propose the manifold Gaussian process latent variable model (mGPLVM), where neural responses arise from (i) a shared latent variable living on a specific manifold, and (ii) a set of non-parametric tuning curves determining how each neuron contributes to the representation. Cross-validated comparisons of models with different topologies can be used to distinguish between candidate manifolds, and variational inference enables quantification of uncertainty. We demonstrate the validity of the approach on several synthetic datasets, as well as on calcium recordings from the ellipsoid body of Drosophila melanogaster and extracellular recordings from the mouse anterodorsal thalamic nucleus. These circuits are both known to encode head direction, and mGPLVM correctly recovers the ring topology expected from neural populations representing a single angular variable. Kristopher T. Jensen, Ta-Chu Kao, Marco Tripodi, Guillaume Hennequin |
NeurIPS | 1 |