Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keyi Chen 0001

dblp:267/5311-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 63% Optimization for machine learning · 37%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › no-regret algorithms
follow-the-regularized-leader
0.712023
Generalized Implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leader · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.712023
Generalized Implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leader · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.712023
Generalized Implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leader · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
coin-betting
0.612022
Better Parameter-Free Stochastic Optimization with ODE Updates for Coin-Betting · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.612022
Better Parameter-Free Stochastic Optimization with ODE Updates for Coin-Betting · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mirror-prox · 0.7fenchel-young inequality · 0.7aprox · 0.7ordinary differential equation · 0.6continuous-time analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Generalized Implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leader
abstract
We propose a new class of online learning algorithms, generalized implicit Follow-The-Regularized-Leader (FTRL), that expands the scope of FTRL framework. Generalized implicit FTRL can recover known algorithms, such as FTRL with linearized losses and implicit FTRL, and it allows the design of new update rules, as extensions of aProx and Mirror-Prox to FTRL. Our theory is constructive in the sense that it provides a simple unifying framework to design updates that directly improve the worst-case upper bound on the regret. The key idea is substituting the linearization of the losses with a Fenchel-Young inequality. We show the flexibility of the framework by proving that some known algorithms, like the Mirror-Prox updates, are instantiations of the generalized implicit FTRL. Finally, the new framework allows us to recover the temporal variation bound of implicit OMD, with the same computational complexity.
Keyi Chen 0001, Francesco Orabona
ICML1
2022 Better Parameter-Free Stochastic Optimization with ODE Updates for Coin-Betting
abstract
Parameter-free stochastic gradient descent (PFSGD) algorithms do not require setting learning rates while achieving optimal theoretical performance. In practical applications, however, there remains an empirical gap between tuned stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and PFSGD. In this paper, we close the empirical gap with a new parameter-free algorithm based on continuous-time Coin-Betting on truncated models. The new update is derived through the solution of an Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) and solved in a closed form. We show empirically that this new parameter-free algorithm outperforms algorithms with the ``best default'' learning rates and almost matches the performance of finely tuned baselines without anything to tune.
Keyi Chen 0001, John Langford 0001, Francesco Orabona
AAAI1
2022 Implicit Parameter-free Online Learning with Truncated Linear Models
abstract
Parameter-free algorithms are online learning algorithms that do not require setting learning rates. They achieve optimal regret with respect to the distance between the initial point and any competitor. Yet, parameter-free algorithms do not take into account the geometry of the losses. Recently, in the stochastic optimization literature, it has been proposed to instead use truncated linear lower bounds, which produce better performance by more closely modeling the losses. In particular, truncated linear models greatly reduce the problem of overshooting the minimum of the loss function. Unfortunately, truncated linear models cannot be used with parameter-free algorithms because the updates become very expensive to compute. In this paper, we propose new parameter-free algorithms that can take advantage of truncated linear models through a new update that has an “implicit” flavor. Based on a novel decomposition of the regret, the new update is efficient, requires only one gradient at each step, never overshoots the minimum of the truncated model, and retains the favorable parameter-free properties. We also conduct an empirical study demonstrating the practical utility of our algorithms.
Keyi Chen 0001, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona
ALT1