Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhaokun Han

dblp:267/5358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2998-3800ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Electronic design automation · 77% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 17% Integrated circuit design · 6%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › hardware obfuscation › logic obfuscation
logic locking
2.132025
SCONE: A Logic Locking Technique Utilizing SMT Solver and Circuit Encoding Scheme for Efficient Hardware IP Protection · DAC 2025
STATION: State Encoding-Based Attack-Resilient Sequential Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Does logic locking work with EDA tools? · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Hardware security and side channels
intellectual property protection
1.832025
SCONE: A Logic Locking Technique Utilizing SMT Solver and Circuit Encoding Scheme for Efficient Hardware IP Protection · DAC 2025
STATION: State Encoding-Based Attack-Resilient Sequential Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
FuncTeller: How Well Does eFPGA Hide Functionality? · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.912025
SCONE: A Logic Locking Technique Utilizing SMT Solver and Circuit Encoding Scheme for Efficient Hardware IP Protection · DAC 2025
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
satisfiability modulo theories
0.912025
SCONE: A Logic Locking Technique Utilizing SMT Solver and Circuit Encoding Scheme for Efficient Hardware IP Protection · DAC 2025
Hardware security and side channels
integrated circuit security
0.722023
Does logic locking work with EDA tools? · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
FuncTeller: How Well Does eFPGA Hide Functionality? · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › reconfigurable architecture
embedded FPGA
0.712023
FuncTeller: How Well Does eFPGA Hide Functionality? · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Electronic design automation › hardware security
logic locking
0.512021
Does logic locking work with EDA tools? · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.512021
Does logic locking work with EDA tools? · USENIX Security Symposium 2021
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.212024
STATION: State Encoding-Based Attack-Resilient Sequential Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
sequential circuit design
0.212024
STATION: State Encoding-Based Attack-Resilient Sequential Obfuscation · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

satisfiability modulo theories · 1.7circuit encoding · 1.7structural attack · 1.5input-output query attack · 1.5finite state machine encoding · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SCONE: A Logic Locking Technique Utilizing SMT Solver and Circuit Encoding Scheme for Efficient Hardware IP Protection
abstract
Multiple intellectual property (IP) protections have emerged to defeat security threats in integrated circuit (IC) supply chain. Among these, logic locking is regarded as a promising IP protection for its security. A state-of-the-art work uses stripped-functionality logic locking (SFLL) technique with protected input patterns (PIPs) satisfying the distance of at least 2 (Dist2) property, or D2PIPs, for ensuring resilience against both input-output (I/O)-based and structural attacks. However, this approach has research challenges in scalability, flexibility, and security, as stated and discussed in our paper. Our paper solves these challenges by (i) utilizing a satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solver and (ii) developing a secure circuit encoding scheme. SCONE, our secure logic locking technique, combines the two methods and meets all three challenges simultaneously. Our results show that SCONE improves scalability $\mathbf{3 5 0} \times$ on the IBEX processor (16 K gates) and remains resilient against five I/O or structural attacks. Index Terms-logic locking, encoding scheme, SMT solver.
Zhaokun Han, Daniel Xing, Kostas Amberiadis, Ankur Srivastava 0001, Jeyavijayan Rajendran
DAC1
2024 STATION: State Encoding-Based Attack-Resilient Sequential Obfuscation
abstract
The unauthorized duplication of design intellectual property (IP) and illegal overproduction of integrated circuits (ICs) are hardware security threats plaguing the security of the globalized IC supply chain. Researchers have developed various countermeasures such as logic locking, layout camouflaging, and split manufacturing to overcome the security threat of IP piracy and unauthorized overproduction. Logic locking is a holistic solution among all countermeasures since it safeguards the design IP against untrusted entities, such as untrusted foundries, test facilities, or end-users throughout the globalized IC supply chain. There are well-known logic locking techniques for combinational circuits with well-established security properties; however, their sequential counterparts remain vulnerable. Since most practical designs are inherently sequential, it is essential to develop secure obfuscation techniques to protect sequential designs. This paper proposes a sequential obfuscation technique, STATION, building on the principles of finite state machine encoding schemes. STATION is resilient against various attacks on sequential obfuscation–input-output (I/O) query attacks and structural attacks, including the ones targeting sequential obfuscation–which have broken all state-of-the-art sequential obfuscation techniques. STATION achieves good resilience and desired security against various I/O and structural attacks, which we ascertain by launching 9 different attacks on all tested circuits. Moreover, STATION ensures tolerable overheads in power, performance, and area, such as 8.75%, 1.22%, and 5.63% on the largest tested circuit, containing 102 inputs, 7 outputs, 6.1×104 gates, 7 flip flops, 100 states, and 3.0×103 transitions.
Zhaokun Han, Aneesh Dixit, Satwik Patnaik, Jeyavijayan Rajendran
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2023 FuncTeller: How Well Does eFPGA Hide Functionality?
Zhaokun Han, Mohammed Shayan, Aneesh Dixit, Mustafa M. Shihab, Yiorgos Makris, Jeyavijayan Rajendran
USENIX Security Symposium1
2021 Does logic locking work with EDA tools?
Zhaokun Han, Muhammad Yasin, Jeyavijayan Rajendran
USENIX Security Symposium1
2020 Multi-Objective Strategies for Stripped-Functionality Logic Locking
abstract
Logic locking acts as powerful countermeasure against piracy and reverse engineering attacks on the Integrated circuit (IC) supply chain. Stripped functionality logic locking (SFLL) represents the state-of-the-art in logic locking. SFLL delivers high resilience against certain attacks; however, it can protect only a small fraction of the design. Moreover, it fails to achieve a high corruption rate at the circuit outputs. In this paper, we explore strategies for deploying SFLL in a way that optimizes both corruption rate and resilience while protecting a large fraction of the design. The proposed joint optimization framework leverages the principles of VLSI testing to meet desired objectives cost-effectively.
Zhaokun Han, Muhammad Yasin, Jeyavijayan Rajendran
ISCAS1