EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joe Eappen
dblp:267/5377
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9386-5545ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 60% Robot navigation and mapping · 20% Motion planning and robot control · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Co-learning Planning and Control Policies Constrained by Differentiable Logic Specifications · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Information-Directed Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
pessimism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Information-Directed Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Information-Directed Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Co-learning Planning and Control Policies Constrained by Differentiable Logic Specifications · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stein discrepancy · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8differentiable logic specifications · 0.8concentration bounds · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Information-Directed Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractPolicy optimization from batch data, i.e., offline reinforcement learning (RL) is important when collecting data from a current policy is not possible. This setting incurs distribution mismatch between batch training data and trajectories from the current policy. Pessimistic offsets estimate mismatch using concentration bounds, which possess strong theoretical guarantees and simplicity of implementation. Mismatch may be conservative in sparse data regions and less so otherwise, which can result in under-performing their no-penalty variants in practice. We derive a new pessimistic penalty as the distance between the data and the true distribution using an evaluable one-sample test known as Stein Discrepancy that requires minimal smoothness conditions, and noticeably, allows a mixture family representation of distribution over next states. This entity forms a quantifier of information in offline data, which justifies calling this approach *information-directed pessimism* (IDP) for offline RL. We further establish that this new penalty based on discrete Stein discrepancy yields practical gains in performance while generalizing the regret of prior art to multimodal distributions. Alec Koppel, Sujay Bhatt, Jiacheng Guo, Joe Eappen, Mengdi Wang 0001, Sumitra Ganesh |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Co-learning Planning and Control Policies Constrained by Differentiable Logic SpecificationsabstractSynthesizing planning and control policies in robotics is a fundamental task, further complicated by factors such as complex logic specifications and high-dimensional robot dynamics. This paper presents a novel reinforcement learning approach to solving high-dimensional robot navigation tasks with complex logic specifications by co-learning planning and control policies. Notably, this approach significantly reduces the sample complexity in training, allowing us to train high-quality policies with much fewer samples compared to existing reinforcement learning algorithms. In addition, our methodology streamlines complex specification extraction from map images and enables the efficient generation of long-horizon robot motion paths across different map layouts. Moreover, our approach also demonstrates capabilities for high-dimensional control and avoiding suboptimal policies via policy alignment. The efficacy of our approach is demonstrated through experiments involving simulated high-dimensional quadruped robot dynamics and a real-world differential drive robot (TurtleBot3) under different types of task specifications. Zikang Xiong, Daniel Lawson, Joe Eappen, Ahmed H. Qureshi, Suresh Jagannathan |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2022 | Model-free Neural Lyapunov Control for Safe Robot NavigationabstractModel-free Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) controllers have demonstrated promising results on various challenging non-linear control tasks. While a model-free DRL algorithm can solve unknown dynamics and high-dimensional problems, it lacks safety assurance. Although safety constraints can be encoded as part of a reward function, there still exists a large gap between an RL controller trained with this modified reward and a safe controller. In contrast, instead of implicitly encoding safety constraints with rewards, we explicitly colearn a Twin Neural Lyapunov Function (TNLF) with the control policy in the DRL training loop and use the learned TNLF to build a runtime monitor. Combined with the path generated from a planner, the monitor chooses appropriate waypoints that guide the learned controller to provide collision-free control trajectories. Our approach inherits the scalability advantages from DRL while enhancing safety guarantees. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach compared to DRL with augmented rewards and constrained DRL methods over a range of high-dimensional safety-sensitive navigation tasks. Zikang Xiong, Joe Eappen, Ahmed H. Qureshi, Suresh Jagannathan |
IROS | 2 |
| 2022 | DistSPECTRL: Distributing Specifications in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Systems
Joe Eappen, Suresh Jagannathan |
ECML/PKDD (4) | 1 |
| 2022 | Defending Observation Attacks in Deep Reinforcement Learning via Detection and Denoising
Zikang Xiong, Joe Eappen, He Zhu 0001, Suresh Jagannathan |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 2 |