Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shining Bo

dblp:267/5386 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
implicit relevance feedback
0.412020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020
Information retrieval
question answering
0.412020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020
Information retrieval
relevance feedback
0.412020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020
Information retrieval › question answering
web question answering
0.412020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
passage ranking
0.112020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112020
Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user behavior modeling · 0.4click log mining · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering
abstract
Training and refreshing a web-scale Question Answering (QA) system for a multi-lingual commercial search engine often requires a huge amount of training examples. One principled idea is to mine implicit relevance feedback from user behavior recorded in search engine logs. All previous works on mining implicit relevance feedback target at relevance of web documents rather than passages. Due to several unique characteristics of QA tasks, the existing user behavior models for web documents cannot be applied to infer passage relevance. In this paper, we make the first study to explore the correlation between user behavior and passage relevance, and propose a novel approach for mining training data for Web QA. We conduct extensive experiments on four test datasets and the results show our approach significantly improves the accuracy of passage ranking without extra human labeled data. In practice, this work has proved effective to substantially reduce the human labeling cost for the QA service in a global commercial search engine, especially for languages with low resources. Our techniques have been deployed in multi-language services.
Linjun Shou, Shining Bo, Feixiang Cheng, Ming Gong 0001, Jian Pei 0001, Daxin Jiang
KDD2