Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shining Bo
dblp:267/5386
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
implicit relevance feedback |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval
relevance feedback |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval › question answering
web question answering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
passage ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question Answering · KDD 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user behavior modeling · 0.4click log mining · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Mining Implicit Relevance Feedback from User Behavior for Web Question AnsweringabstractTraining and refreshing a web-scale Question Answering (QA) system for a multi-lingual commercial search engine often requires a huge amount of training examples. One principled idea is to mine implicit relevance feedback from user behavior recorded in search engine logs. All previous works on mining implicit relevance feedback target at relevance of web documents rather than passages. Due to several unique characteristics of QA tasks, the existing user behavior models for web documents cannot be applied to infer passage relevance. In this paper, we make the first study to explore the correlation between user behavior and passage relevance, and propose a novel approach for mining training data for Web QA. We conduct extensive experiments on four test datasets and the results show our approach significantly improves the accuracy of passage ranking without extra human labeled data. In practice, this work has proved effective to substantially reduce the human labeling cost for the QA service in a global commercial search engine, especially for languages with low resources. Our techniques have been deployed in multi-language services. Linjun Shou, Shining Bo, Feixiang Cheng, Ming Gong 0001, Jian Pei 0001, Daxin Jiang |
KDD | 2 |