EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothy DelSole
dblp:267/5430
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2041-3024ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
climate informatics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning and Dynamical Models for Sub-seasonal Climate Forecasting: Comparison and Collaboration · AAAI 2022 |
Environmental and earth informatics
climate prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Sub-Seasonal Climate Forecasting via Machine Learning: Challenges, Analysis, and Advances · AAAI 2021 |
Environmental and earth informatics › weather forecasting
subseasonal forecasting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Sub-Seasonal Climate Forecasting via Machine Learning: Challenges, Analysis, and Advances · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physics-based dynamical models · 1.1machine learning models · 1.1deep learning · 1.0XGBoost · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning and Dynamical Models for Sub-seasonal Climate Forecasting: Comparison and CollaborationabstractSub-seasonal forecasting (SSF) is the prediction of key climate variables such as temperature and precipitation on the 2-week to 2-month time horizon. Skillful SSF would have substantial societal value in areas such as agricultural productivity, hydrology and water resource management, and emergency planning for extreme events such as droughts and wildfires. Despite its societal importance, SSF has stayed a challenging problem compared to both short-term weather forecasting and long-term seasonal forecasting. Recent studies have shown the potential of machine learning (ML) models to advance SSF. In this paper, for the first time, we perform a fine-grained comparison of a suite of modern ML models with start-of-the-art physics-based dynamical models from the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) project for SSF in the western contiguous United States. Additionally, we explore mechanisms to enhance the ML models by using forecasts from dynamical models. Empirical results illustrate that, on average, ML models outperform dynamical models while the ML models tend to generate forecasts with conservative magnitude compared to the SubX models. Further, we illustrate that ML models make forecasting errors under extreme weather conditions, e.g., cold waves due to the polar vortex, highlighting the need for separate models for extreme events. Finally, we show that suitably incorporating dynamical model forecasts as inputs to ML models can substantially improve the forecasting performance of the ML models. The SSF dataset constructed for the work and code for the ML models are released along with the paper for the benefit of the artificial intelligence community. Sijie He, Laurie Trenary, Benjamin A. Cash, Timothy DelSole, Arindam Banerjee 0001 |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2021 | Sub-Seasonal Climate Forecasting via Machine Learning: Challenges, Analysis, and AdvancesabstractSub-seasonal forecasting (SSF) focuses on predicting key variables such as temperature and precipitation on the 2-week to 2-month time scale. Skillful SSF would have immense societal value in such areas as agricultural productivity, water resource management, and emergency planning for extreme weather events. However, SSF is considered more challenging than either weather prediction or even seasonal prediction, and is still a largely understudied problem. In this paper, we carefully investigate 10 Machine Learning (ML) approaches to sub-seasonal temperature forecasting over the contiguous U.S. on the SSF dataset we collect, including a variety of climate variables from the atmosphere, ocean, and land. Because of the complicated atmosphere-land-ocean couplings and the limited amount of good quality observational data, SSF imposes a great challenge for ML despite the recent advances in various domains. Our results indicate that suitable ML models, e.g., XGBoost, to some extent, capture the predictability on sub-seasonal time scales and can outperform the climatological baselines, while Deep Learning (DL) models barely manage to match the best results with carefully designed architecture. Besides, our analysis and exploration provide insights on important aspects to improve the quality of sub-seasonal forecasts, e.g., feature representation and model architecture. The SSF dataset and code are released with this paper for use by the broader research community. Sijie He, Timothy DelSole, Pradeep Ravikumar, Arindam Banerjee 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |