Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omri Puny

dblp:267/5465 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 31% Generative modeling · 27% 3D vision · 14%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.722025
FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.912025
Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.912025
Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.912025
FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
3d generative model
0.812024
Mosaic-SDF for 3D Generative Models · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape representation
0.812024
Mosaic-SDF for 3D Generative Models · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
controlled generation
0.812024
D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
inverse problem
0.812024
D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation · ICML 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
signed distance field representation
0.812024
Mosaic-SDF for 3D Generative Models · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › 3d shape generation
text-to-3d generation
0.812024
Mosaic-SDF for 3D Generative Models · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power
0.712023
Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural Networks · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
symmetry-aware representation
0.212022
Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Design · ICLR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallelization · 0.9mixed integer programming · 0.9feed-forward network fusion · 0.9blockwise local knowledge distillation · 0.9transformer · 0.8local grid · 0.8gradient projection · 0.8flow model · 0.8differentiation through flow · 0.8tensor contraction · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer remarkable capabilities, yet their high inference costs restrict wider adoption. While increasing parameter counts improves accuracy, it also broadens the gap between state-of-the-art capabilities and practical deployability. We present **Puzzle**, a hardware-aware framework that accelerates the inference of LLMs while preserving their capabilities. Using neural architecture search (NAS) at a large-scale, Puzzle optimizes models with tens of billions of parameters. Our approach utilizes blockwise local knowledge distillation (BLD) for parallel architecture exploration and employs mixed-integer programming for precise constraint optimization. We showcase our framework’s impact via Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B-Instruct (Nemotron-51B) and Llama-3.3-Nemotron-49B, two publicly available models derived from Llama-70B-Instruct. Both models achieve a 2.17x inference throughput speedup, fitting on a single NVIDIA H100 GPU while retaining 98.4% of the original model's benchmark accuracies. These are the most accurate models supporting single H100 GPU inference with large batch sizes, despite training on 45B tokens at most, far fewer than the 15T used to train Llama-70B. Lastly, we show that lightweight alignment on these derived models allows them to surpass the parent model in specific capabilities. Our work establishes that powerful LLM models can be optimized for efficient deployment with only negligible loss in quality, underscoring that inference performance, not parameter count alone, should guide model selection.
Akhiad Bercovich, Tomer Ronen, Talor Abramovich, Nir Ailon, Nave Assaf, Mohammad Dabbah, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izhak Golan, Netanel Haber, Ehud Karpas, Roi Koren, Itay Levy, Pavlo Molchanov 0001, Shahar Mor, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Omri Puny, Ran Rubin, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Omer Ullman Argov, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv
ICML19
2025 FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models
abstract
We introduce \textit{FFN Fusion}, an architectural optimization technique that reduces sequential computation in large language models by identifying and exploiting natural opportunities for parallelization. Our key insight is that sequences of Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers, particularly those remaining after the removal of specific attention layers, can often be parallelized with minimal accuracy impact. We develop a principled methodology for identifying and fusing such sequences, transforming them into parallel operations that significantly reduce inference latency while preserving model behavior. Applying these techniques to Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, we create a 253B model (253B-Base), an efficient and soon-to-be publicly available model that achieves a 1.71$\times$ speedup in inference latency and 35$\times$ lower per-token cost while maintaining strong performance across benchmarks. Most intriguingly, we find that even full transformer blocks containing both attention and FFN layers can sometimes be parallelized, suggesting new directions for neural architecture design.
Akhiad Bercovich, Mohammad Dabbah, Omri Puny, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izik Golan, Ehud Karpas, Itay Levy, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Tomer Ronen, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv
NeurIPS3
2024 Mosaic-SDF for 3D Generative Models
abstract
Current diffusion or flow-based generative models for 3D shapes divide to two: distilling pre-trained 2D image diffusion models, and training directly on 3D shapes. When training a diffusion or flow models on 3D shapes a crucial design choice is the shape representation. An effective shape representation needs to adhere three design principles: it should allow an efficient conversion of large 3D datasets to the representation form; it should provide a good tradeoff of approximation power versus number of parameters; and it should have a simple tensorial form that is compatible with existing powerful neural architectures. While standard 3D shape representations such as volumetric grids and point clouds do not adhere to all these principles simultaneously, we advocate in this paper a new representation that does. We introduce Mosaic-SDF (M-SDF): a simple 3D shape representation that approximates the Signed Distance Function (SDF) of a given shape by using a set of local grids spread near the shape's boundary. The M-SDF representation is fast to compute for each shape individually making it readily parallelizable; it is parameter efficient as it only covers the space around the shape's boundary; and it has a simple matrix form, compatible with Transformer-based architectures. We demonstrate the efficacy of the M-SDF representation by using it to train a 3D generative flow model including class-conditioned generation with the ShapeNetCore-V2 (3D Warehouse) dataset, and text-to-3D generation using a dataset of about 600k caption-shape pairs.
Lior Yariv, Omri Puny, Oran Gafni, Yaron Lipman
CVPR2
2024 D-Flow: Differentiating through Flows for Controlled Generation
abstract
Taming the generation outcome of state of the art Diffusion and Flow-Matching (FM) models without having to re-train a task-specific model unlocks a powerful tool for solving inverse problems, conditional generation, and controlled generation in general. In this work we introduce *D-Flow*, a simple framework for controlling the generation process by differentiating through the flow, optimizing for the source (noise) point. We motivate this framework by our key observation stating that for Diffusion/FM models trained with Gaussian probability paths, differentiating through the generation process projects gradient on the data manifold, implicitly injecting the prior into the optimization process. We validate our framework on linear and non-linear controlled generation problems including: image and audio inverse problems and conditional molecule generation reaching state of the art performance across all.
Heli Ben-Hamu, Omri Puny, Itai Gat, Brian Karrer, Uriel Singer, Yaron Lipman
ICML2
2023 Equivariant Polynomials for Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNN) are inherently limited in their expressive power. Recent seminal works (Xu et al., 2019; Morris et al., 2019b) introduced the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) hierarchy as a measure of expressive power. Although this hierarchy has propelled significant advances in GNN analysis and architecture developments, it suffers from several significant limitations. These include a complex definition that lacks direct guidance for model improvement and a WL hierarchy that is too coarse to study current GNNs. This paper introduces an alternative expressive power hierarchy based on the ability of GNNs to calculate equivariant polynomials of a certain degree. As a first step, we provide a full characterization of all equivariant graph polynomials by introducing a concrete basis, significantly generalizing previous results. Each basis element corresponds to a specific multi-graph, and its computation over some graph data input corresponds to a tensor contraction problem. Second, we propose algorithmic tools for evaluating the expressiveness of GNNs using tensor contraction sequences, and calculate the expressive power of popular GNNs. Finally, we enhance the expressivity of common GNN architectures by adding polynomial features or additional operations / aggregations inspired by our theory. These enhanced GNNs demonstrate state-of-the-art results in experiments across multiple graph learning benchmarks.
Omri Puny, Derek Lim, Bobak T. Kiani, Haggai Maron, Yaron Lipman
ICML1
2022 Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Design
Omri Puny, Matan Atzmon, Edward J. Smith, Ishan Misra, Aditya Grover, Heli Ben-Hamu, Yaron Lipman
ICLR1