Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Luc Cary

dblp:267/5546 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation
inductive program synthesis
0.512021
DreamCoder: bootstrapping inductive program synthesis with wake-sleep library learning · PLDI 2021
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive program synthesis
library learning
0.512021
DreamCoder: bootstrapping inductive program synthesis with wake-sleep library learning · PLDI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wake-sleep algorithm · 1.0neural search policy · 1.0e-graph matching · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 DreamCoder: bootstrapping inductive program synthesis with wake-sleep library learning
abstract
We present a system for inductive program synthesis called DreamCoder, which inputs a corpus of synthesis problems each specified by one or a few examples, and automatically derives a library of program components and a neural search policy that can be used to efficiently solve other similar synthesis problems. The library and search policy bootstrap each other iteratively through a variant of "wake-sleep" approximate Bayesian learning. A new refactoring algorithm based on E-graph matching identifies common sub-components across synthesized programs, building a progressively deepening library of abstractions capturing the structure of the input domain. We evaluate on eight domains including classic program synthesis areas and AI tasks such as planning, inverse graphics, and equation discovery. We show that jointly learning the library and neural search policy leads to solving more problems, and solving them more quickly.
Kevin Ellis, Catherine Wong, Maxwell I. Nye, Mathias Sablé-Meyer, Lucas Morales, Luke B. Hewitt, Luc Cary, Armando Solar-Lezama, Josh Tenenbaum
PLDI7